What is the Knosp classification system for grading pituitary adenoma invasion into the cavernous sinus?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 10, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Knosp Classification System for Pituitary Adenoma Cavernous Sinus Invasion

Overview

The Knosp classification is a 5-grade MRI-based system (Grades 0-4) that predicts the likelihood of pituitary adenoma invasion into the cavernous sinus by using the internal carotid artery (ICA) as a radiological landmark on coronal MRI sequences. 1

The Five Grades Explained

Grade 0: No Parasellar Extension

  • The tumor does not extend beyond the medial tangent of the ICA (an imaginary line drawn along the medial wall of the cavernous ICA). 1
  • This represents normal anatomy with no cavernous sinus involvement. 1
  • Surgical invasion rate: 0% 1, 2

Grade 1: Minimal Extension

  • The tumor extends beyond the medial tangent but does not reach past the intercarotid line (an imaginary line connecting the centers of both ICAs). 1
  • The adenoma pushes into the cavernous sinus space but remains medial to the center of the ICA. 1
  • Surgical invasion rate: 1.5% with an 83% gross-total resection rate and 88% endocrinological remission rate. 2

Grade 2: Moderate Extension

  • The tumor extends beyond the intercarotid line but does not pass the lateral tangent of the ICA (an imaginary line drawn along the lateral wall of the cavernous ICA). 1
  • This is the critical transition zone where invasion becomes more likely. 1
  • Surgical invasion rate: 9.9% with a 71% gross-total resection rate and 60% endocrinological remission rate. 2
  • Important caveat: This grade has "very weak" interrater reliability (0.18) among physicians, meaning different doctors often disagree on Grade 2 classifications. 3

Grade 3: Significant Extension

  • The tumor extends beyond the lateral tangent of the ICA but does not completely encircle it. 1
  • The 2015 revision subdivided this into:
    • Grade 3A: Tumor invades the superior-posterior compartment of the cavernous sinus with a 26.5% invasion rate, 85% gross-total resection rate, and 67% endocrinological remission rate. 2
    • Grade 3B: Tumor invades the inferior-anterior compartment with a significantly higher 70.6% invasion rate, 64% gross-total resection rate, and 0% endocrinological remission rate. 2
  • Overall Grade 3 surgical invasion rate: 37.9% 2

Grade 4: Complete Encasement

  • The tumor completely encircles (encases) the intracavernous ICA. 1
  • Surgical invasion rate: 100% with 0% gross-total resection rate and 0% endocrinological remission rate. 1, 2
  • This is the only grade that consistently corresponds to true cavernous sinus invasion in all cases. 4

Clinical Application

When using the Knosp scale for surgical decision-making, dichotomize it into two clinically useful groups: Grades 0-2 (unlikely to have intraoperative cavernous sinus involvement) versus Grades 3-4 (likely to have cavernous sinus involvement), which improves reliability from "very weak" to "strong" (0.60) and increases physician agreement to 60%. 3

The endoscopic endonasal approach provides superior detection of actual cavernous sinus invasion compared to microscopic techniques, revealing that 43% of cases with Knosp grade >1 have no actual invasion on direct surgical inspection. 4 Endoscopic verification shows significantly lower invasion rates for Grade 2 (9.9% vs 88% microscopic) and Grade 3 (37.9% vs 86% microscopic) adenomas. 2

Key Imaging Requirements

Perform the Knosp grading on coronal MRI sequences with gadolinium contrast enhancement, as the ICA serves as the readily detectable radiological landmark. 1 High-resolution, focused field-of-view sequences targeted for sellar and parasellar assessment optimize visualization. 5

Critical Pitfalls

Grades 1 and 2 have poor interrater reliability, with only 5% agreement among all reviewers for middle scores, so consider obtaining a second opinion or using advanced imaging techniques like 3D multimodal imaging for borderline cases. 3 The distinction between Grade 3A and 3B is clinically crucial because Grade 3B adenomas have nearly three times the invasion rate and zero endocrinological remission compared to Grade 3A. 2

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.