What is the mortality rate of Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 10, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

NSTEMI Mortality Rates

NSTEMI mortality varies significantly by timeframe and risk profile, with in-hospital mortality ranging from 1.0-3.6%, 30-day mortality from 1.5-4.9%, 6-month mortality around 7-12%, and 1-year mortality from 2.2-3.9%, with higher rates observed in lower-income countries and patients with multiple comorbidities. 1, 2

Short-Term Mortality (In-Hospital and 30-Day)

  • In-hospital mortality for NSTEMI patients ranges from 1.0% in high-income countries to 3.6% in low to lower-middle-income countries, demonstrating a clear inverse economic gradient 2
  • A recent U.S. registry study reported in-hospital NSTEMI mortality of 1.6%, which was lower than STEMI (4.4%) but higher than unstable angina (0%) 3
  • 30-day mortality ranges from 1.5% in high-income countries to 4.9% in low to lower-middle-income countries 2

Medium-Term Mortality (6 Months to 1 Year)

The landmark trials provide consistent mortality data for NSTEMI patients:

  • In FRISC-II, the 1-year mortality rate was 2.2% with invasive strategy versus 3.9% with conservative strategy (p=0.016) 1
  • In TACTICS-TIMI 18, the 6-month death or MI rate was 7.3% with invasive strategy versus 9.5% with conservative strategy (p<0.05) 1
  • The composite endpoint of death, MI, or rehospitalization at 6 months occurred in 15.9% with invasive strategy versus 19.4% with conservative strategy (p=0.025) 1

Long-Term Mortality (Beyond 1 Year)

  • At 5 years, FRISC-II demonstrated mortality benefit with invasive strategy (HR 0.81, p=0.009), though benefit was confined to men, nonsmokers, and patients with 2 or more risk factors 1
  • A Korean registry study showed 3-year all-cause mortality of 10.9% for NSTEMI, which was paradoxically higher than STEMI (5.8%) after discharge (HR 0.464,95% CI 0.359-0.600, p<0.001) 4
  • 3-year cardiac mortality was 6.6% for NSTEMI versus 3.5% for STEMI (HR 0.474,95% CI 0.344-0.654, p<0.001) 4

Risk Stratification and Mortality Prediction

The TIMI Risk Score provides validated mortality estimates for NSTEMI 1:

  • Score 0-1: 4.7% risk of death, MI, or urgent revascularization through 14 days
  • Score 2: 8.3%
  • Score 3: 13.2%
  • Score 4: 19.9%
  • Score 5: 25.2%
  • Score 6-7: 40.9%

The GRACE Risk Score offers in-hospital mortality predictions ranging from 0.2% (score <80) to 52% (score ≥240) 1

Key Mortality Risk Factors

In NSTEMI specifically, the primary risk factors for mortality include 4:

  • Low left ventricular ejection fraction (<40%) - strongest predictor
  • No percutaneous coronary intervention performed
  • Age ≥65 years
  • Low hemoglobin (<12 g/dL)

Important Clinical Caveats

  • NSTEMI patients have lower in-hospital mortality than STEMI but higher long-term mortality after discharge, likely due to older age, more comorbidities, and less complete revascularization 4
  • Mortality risk is substantially higher in low to lower-middle-income countries (in-hospital: 3.6% vs 1.0%; 30-day: 4.9% vs 1.5%) despite younger patient age, reflecting differences in healthcare access and quality 2
  • Contemporary mortality rates have improved dramatically - the 2020 ESC Guidelines report 6-month mortality decreased from 17.2% in 1995 to 6.3% in 2015 (adjusted HR 0.40) 1
  • Risk stratification is critical - mortality benefit from invasive strategy is primarily seen in medium- and high-risk patients (troponin >0.01 ng/mL, ST-segment deviation, or TIMI score >3), while low-risk patients show similar outcomes with either strategy 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.