What is a TASC (TransAtlantic InterSociety Consensus) D vascular lesion?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 10, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

TASC D Vascular Lesions

TASC D lesions represent the most severe and extensive category of peripheral arterial occlusive disease, characterized by long-segment or complete occlusions with complex anatomy, for which surgical revascularization has traditionally been the treatment of choice. 1

Anatomic Definition by Location

Iliac Artery TASC D Lesions

TASC D iliac lesions include the following patterns 1:

  • Diffuse, multiple unilateral stenoses involving the common iliac artery (CIA), external iliac artery (EIA), and common femoral artery (CFA), usually exceeding 10 cm in length 1
  • Unilateral occlusion involving both the CIA and EIA 1
  • Bilateral EIA occlusions 1
  • Diffuse disease involving the aorta and both iliac arteries 1
  • Iliac stenoses in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm or other lesions requiring aortic or iliac surgery 1

Femoropopliteal TASC D Lesions

TASC D femoropopliteal lesions are defined as 1:

  • Complete common femoral artery occlusion 1
  • Complete superficial femoral artery (SFA) occlusion 1
  • Complete popliteal and proximal trifurcation occlusions 1

Treatment Recommendations

Primary Treatment Strategy

Surgery is the procedure of choice for TASC D lesions according to ACC/AHA guidelines, though this recommendation acknowledges that more evidence is needed for definitive guidance on type B and C lesions 1. The rationale is that these extensive lesions have historically demonstrated better long-term outcomes with surgical bypass compared to endovascular approaches 1.

Evolving Role of Endovascular Therapy

Despite traditional surgical recommendations, more recent data suggest an expanded role for endovascular therapy even in TASC D lesions 1. Key considerations include:

  • Primary stenting has demonstrated significantly higher 12-month patency rates (92.1%) compared to selective stenting (82.9%) for TASC C and D lesions 1
  • Some studies have found no significant difference in patency rates among all TASC categories, questioning the utility of TASC classification for treatment decisions 1
  • Primary stenting demonstrates significantly higher complication rates in TASC C and D lesions compared to TASC A and B lesions 1

Endovascular Outcomes for TASC D Lesions

When endovascular treatment is performed for TASC D femoropopliteal lesions 2, 3:

  • Technical success rates range from 91-95% 2, 4
  • Primary patency at 12 months is approximately 52-63%, dropping to 27-41% at 24 months 2, 3
  • Secondary patency rates are substantially better, reaching 88-96% at 12 months and 63-88% at 24 months 2, 3
  • Limb salvage rates are excellent, with no major amputations in some series during follow-up 2
  • Restenosis is common (26.6% in one series), mandating strict surveillance 2

For TASC D aortoiliac lesions 5:

  • Procedural success rates are lower (91.6% vs 99.3% for TASC A-C) 5
  • Complication rates are higher (11.1% vs 5.2% for TASC A-C) 5
  • Five-year primary patency is comparable to less complex lesions (77.9% vs 77.1%) 5

Clinical Context and Decision-Making

Patient Selection Factors

The choice between endovascular and surgical approaches for TASC D lesions should consider 1, 6:

  • Symptom severity and functional impact on quality of life 1
  • Surgical risk profile and comorbidities 6
  • Availability of autologous vein for bypass 6
  • Complexity of lesion anatomy 6
  • Patient life expectancy and goals of care 1

Important Caveats

Endovascular treatment of TASC D lesions requires acceptance of higher reintervention rates compared to surgical bypass, though limb salvage outcomes may be comparable 2, 3. This approach may be particularly appropriate for:

  • High-risk surgical candidates 7
  • Patients with limited life expectancy 3
  • Those requiring limb salvage for critical limb ischemia 2
  • Situations where autologous vein is unavailable 6

Strict surveillance protocols are mandatory after endovascular treatment of TASC D lesions due to high restenosis rates, with duplex ultrasound assessment recommended at least annually 6, 2.

Predictors of Poor Outcomes

Factors associated with restenosis/occlusion after endovascular treatment of TASC D lesions include 2, 4:

  • Hypercholesterolemia 2
  • Current or former smoking 2
  • Popliteal artery stent placement 2
  • Poor tibial runoff (fewer run-off vessels) 4

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.