Why is Nexplanon (etonogestrel implant) falling out of favor as a birth control method?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 10, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Nexplanon Is NOT Falling Out of Favor—It Remains the Most Effective Reversible Contraceptive

Nexplanon is not actually falling out of favor; it remains the single most effective reversible contraceptive method available, with a failure rate of only 0.05% and an 84% continuation rate at one year, which is higher than any other hormonal method. 1

The premise of this question appears to be based on a misconception. The evidence strongly supports Nexplanon as a first-line contraceptive option, particularly for adolescents and young women.

Why Nexplanon Remains Highly Recommended

Superior Efficacy Profile

  • Nexplanon has the lowest failure rate of any reversible contraceptive at 0.05%, significantly better than IUDs (0.2-0.8%), injectable contraceptives (6%), or oral contraceptives (9%). 1
  • The American Academy of Pediatrics explicitly recommends counseling patients about LARC methods first, starting with implants, because they are the most effective. 1
  • Typical-use effectiveness approximates perfect-use effectiveness because adherence requirements are minimal. 1

High Continuation Rates

  • At one year, 84% of users continue with the implant, compared to 67% for oral contraceptives, 56% for injectable contraceptives, and 78-80% for IUDs. 1
  • This high continuation rate demonstrates overall user satisfaction despite bleeding irregularities. 1

The Main Challenge: Bleeding Irregularities

Understanding the Issue

  • Unpredictable bleeding or spotting is the most common reason for discontinuation, affecting approximately 18% of users. 1, 2
  • In clinical trials, while 64% of women experienced amenorrhea or infrequent bleeding (often viewed positively), 15% reported frequent or prolonged bleeding. 1
  • Unlike other continuous methods, bleeding patterns may not improve over time with Nexplanon. 2

Effective Management Strategies

When bleeding irregularities occur, they can be successfully managed pharmacologically:

  • Mefenamic acid 500 mg three times daily for 5 days shows significant cessation of bleeding within 7 days. 2
  • Celecoxib 200 mg daily for 5 days also demonstrates efficacy. 2
  • Low-dose combined oral contraceptives or estrogen therapy for 10-20 days can be used as hormonal options. 2

The Critical Role of Counseling

  • Enhanced pre-insertion counseling about expected bleeding patterns has been shown to reduce discontinuation rates in clinical trials. 2, 3
  • Routine counseling may be sufficient for many women to help reduce premature discontinuation rates. 3
  • In a randomized trial, discontinuation rates due to bleeding were only 2.1% for the ENG-implant when appropriate counseling was provided. 3

Important Clinical Considerations

Drug Interactions (Specific Populations)

  • Efavirenz-containing antiretroviral therapy may decrease the efficacy of etonogestrel implants, with contraceptive failures reported in 2 patients receiving efavirenz-based therapy. 1
  • The NIH recommends using an alternative or additional contraceptive method when efavirenz, nevirapine, or most protease inhibitors are administered. 1
  • However, the CDC and WHO state that the benefits of using progestin implants outweigh any risks with concomitant antiretroviral administration. 1

Safety Profile

  • Over 10 years of surveillance in France, only 7% of reported adverse events were serious. 4
  • The most common adverse effects are gynecological (bleeding changes), skin reactions, and metabolic effects—none life-threatening. 4, 5
  • Serious adverse events are infrequent, with the main concerns being infectious complications at the implant site and unintended pregnancies (usually due to insertion technique failures or drug interactions). 4

Insertion and Removal Improvements

  • The newer Nexplanon formulation has decreased the incidence of migrations, removal difficulties, and insertion complications compared to the older Implanon (0.92 vs. 1.31 per 1000 patients). 4
  • All healthcare providers must be trained before performing insertions or removals. 6, 4

When to Consider Alternatives

Nexplanon should be reconsidered only in specific circumstances:

  • If bleeding remains unacceptable despite pharmacologic treatment attempts. 2
  • If the patient is on efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy and additional contraceptive protection cannot be ensured. 1
  • If patient preference dictates after informed discussion, particularly if the levonorgestrel IUD (which reduces menstrual blood loss by 71-95%) would be better tolerated. 2

The Bottom Line

Nexplanon is not falling out of favor—it remains the gold standard for reversible contraception based on efficacy, continuation rates, and safety. 1 The key to maximizing its benefits is thorough pre-insertion counseling about bleeding patterns and having a management plan ready for bleeding irregularities. 2, 3 When properly counseled and supported, the vast majority of users continue successfully with this highly effective method. 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Prolonged Menstrual Bleeding with Implanon

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

[Safety profile of etonogestrel contraceptive implant (Nexplanon® and Implanon®) reported in France].

Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction, 2016

Research

Safety and Benefits of Contraceptives Implants: A Systematic Review.

Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2021

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.