What is the efficacy of Nexletol (bempedoic acid) in lowering Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) levels?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 10, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Nexletol (Bempedoic Acid) Efficacy for LDL-C Lowering

Nexletol (bempedoic acid) reduces LDL-C by approximately 15-25% when used alone, and by 28-45% depending on background therapy, with the highest reductions seen in statin-intolerant patients not on background statins. 1

LDL-C Reduction: Magnitude and Context

Monotherapy Efficacy

  • Bempedoic acid 180 mg daily lowers LDL-C by approximately 15-24% as monotherapy, which is substantially less potent than high-intensity statins (which achieve ~50% reduction) 2, 3
  • The FDA label reports a 20% mean reduction in LDL-C at 6 months in the CLEAR Outcomes trial population 1
  • In patients not taking statins, bempedoic acid achieves 24% LDL-C reduction, compared to 15% in those on background statin therapy 2

Combination Therapy Performance

  • When added to maximally tolerated statin therapy, bempedoic acid provides an additional 18% reduction in LDL-C at 12 weeks 1
  • Bempedoic acid combined with ezetimibe produces approximately 35% LDL-C reduction, offering a more robust lipid-lowering effect 2
  • In real-world Italian clinical practice, patients on intensive statins/ezetimibe who added bempedoic acid achieved 28% LDL-C reduction, while statin-intolerant patients achieved 45% reduction 4

Cardiovascular Outcomes: The Critical Context

Bempedoic acid reduces major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) by 13% compared to placebo in statin-intolerant patients, which is clinically meaningful but more modest than the 24-37% risk reduction seen with statins. 2, 3

CLEAR Outcomes Trial Results

  • The primary composite endpoint (MACE-4: CV death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, or coronary revascularization) was reduced with hazard ratio 0.87 (95% CI: 0.79-0.96; p=0.0037) 1
  • The key secondary endpoint (MACE-3: CV death, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke) showed hazard ratio 0.85 (95% CI: 0.76-0.96; p=0.0058) 1
  • Non-fatal myocardial infarction was reduced by 27% (HR 0.73,95% CI: 0.62-0.87), representing the most robust individual component benefit 1
  • Coronary revascularization was reduced by 19% (HR 0.81,95% CI: 0.72-0.92) 1

Special Population: Diabetes

  • In patients with diabetes, bempedoic acid demonstrated a 17% reduction in MACE-4 events, slightly better than the overall population 2, 3
  • For primary prevention in high-risk diabetic patients, bempedoic acid showed a 30% reduction in primary composite outcomes compared to placebo 2

Additional Lipid Effects

  • Non-HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, and total cholesterol are all significantly reduced with bempedoic acid therapy 1, 5
  • High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) is significantly reduced, suggesting anti-inflammatory effects beyond lipid lowering 5, 6
  • Minimal effect on lipoprotein(a) levels, so this drug should not be chosen if Lp(a) reduction is a therapeutic goal 5
  • HDL-C decreases by approximately 6%, and triglycerides increase modestly by 3% 1

Clinical Positioning and Treatment Algorithm

When to Use Bempedoic Acid

Bempedoic acid is FDA-approved for two distinct indications: 1

  1. Cardiovascular risk reduction in statin-intolerant patients with established CVD or high CVD risk (including those not taking any statin)
  2. LDL-C lowering as adjunct therapy in primary hyperlipidemia including heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

Recommended Treatment Sequence

For statin-intolerant patients, the American College of Cardiology recommends the following hierarchy: 2, 7

  • First-line alternative: Ezetimibe (15-25% LDL-C reduction)
  • Second-line addition: Bempedoic acid (adds 15-25% further reduction)
  • Third-line consideration: PCSK9 inhibitors for very high-risk patients if LDL-C remains ≥70 mg/dL despite ezetimibe and bempedoic acid 7

For patients on maximally tolerated statins not reaching LDL-C goals: 2, 3

  • Add ezetimibe first (provides 15-25% additional reduction)
  • If still not at goal, add bempedoic acid (provides additional 15-18% reduction)
  • Reserve PCSK9 inhibitors for highest-risk patients or those with baseline LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL

Safety Profile and Tolerability

Bempedoic acid is activated only in the liver and not in skeletal muscle, which explains its low incidence of muscle-related adverse effects compared to statins. 2, 3

Key Safety Considerations

  • Muscle-related adverse events are rare (10% in real-world practice, mostly reversible), making this an excellent option for statin-intolerant patients 4, 8
  • Hyperuricemia and gout risk is increased; monitor uric acid levels before initiation and when clinically indicated 2, 1
  • Tendon rupture risk exists; discontinue immediately if tendon rupture occurs, and consider discontinuation with tendinitis symptoms 2
  • Elevated liver enzymes, gallstones, and abnormal liver function tests occurred more frequently in the CLEAR Outcomes trial 2
  • Adherence is excellent (99% in real-world studies) with 90% persistence, likely due to favorable tolerability 4

Contraindications and Monitoring

  • Avoid in pregnancy; discontinue when pregnancy is recognized unless benefits outweigh risks 2
  • Avoid concomitant simvastatin >20 mg daily or pravastatin >40 mg daily 2
  • Monitor liver function tests and assess uric acid levels as clinically indicated 2, 7

Real-World Performance and Target Achievement

In real-world Italian clinical practice, 46% of patients achieved therapeutic LDL-C targets with bempedoic acid, with the drug primarily used in high-risk patients who failed to reach goals with statins/ezetimibe. 4

  • Maximum LDL-C lowering effects occur at Week 4 of therapy 1
  • The drug demonstrates consistent efficacy across subgroups including age, sex, race, diabetes status, baseline LDL-C, and background therapies 1
  • Cost savings were achieved in statin-intolerant patients by avoiding more expensive PCSK9 inhibitors 4

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Do not use bempedoic acid as first-line therapy over statins in statin-tolerant patients—statins remain superior for cardiovascular risk reduction with 24-37% relative risk reduction versus 13% with bempedoic acid 3

  2. Do not skip ezetimibe in the treatment sequence for statin-intolerant patients—ezetimibe should be tried first before bempedoic acid per ACC guidelines 7

  3. Do not assume statin intolerance without proper evaluation—patients must have attempted at least 2 different statins (including one at the lowest approved dose) before being classified as statin-intolerant 2, 7

  4. Do not overlook hyperuricemia monitoring—assess uric acid before initiation and monitor for signs/symptoms of gout, initiating urate-lowering therapy as needed 2

  5. Do not use for Lp(a) reduction—bempedoic acid has minimal effect on lipoprotein(a) levels 5

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Cholesterol Management with Statins and Bempedoic Acid

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Effects of bempedoic acid on markers of inflammation and Lp(a).

Current opinion in cardiology, 2024

Guideline

Management of Statin-Intolerant Patients: Next Medication Options

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Bempedoic acid: LDL-C lowering without adverse reactions.

JAAPA : official journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants, 2021

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.