What is the treatment for Ventricular Tachycardia (Vtach) and Supraventricular Tachycardia (SVtach)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment of Ventricular Tachycardia and Supraventricular Tachycardia

For hemodynamically unstable VTach or SVTach, perform immediate synchronized cardioversion; for stable VTach, use IV amiodarone or procainamide as first-line pharmacologic therapy, while for stable SVTach, begin with vagal maneuvers followed by adenosine.

Ventricular Tachycardia (VTach) Management

Hemodynamically Unstable VTach (Pulseless or with Adverse Signs)

  • Immediate synchronized DC cardioversion is the definitive treatment for pulseless VT or VT with adverse signs (systolic BP ≤90 mmHg, chest pain, heart failure, or rate ≥150 bpm) 1
  • Use escalating energy levels: 100 J, then 200 J, then 360 J if initial attempts fail 1
  • If VT is pulseless, follow the VF protocol with immediate defibrillation as pharmacologic treatment is secondary to early defibrillation 1
  • After successful cardioversion, anticipate atrial or ventricular premature complexes that may reinitiate tachycardia, requiring antiarrhythmic drugs for prevention 1

Hemodynamically Stable VTach

Pharmacologic options in order of preference:

  • Amiodarone is FDA-approved for frequently recurring VF and hemodynamically unstable VT refractory to other therapy, administered as 150 mg IV over 10 minutes, followed by 1 mg/min for 6 hours, then 0.5 mg/min maintenance 2

    • For breakthrough episodes, repeat the 150 mg bolus 2
    • Amiodarone demonstrated 78% immediate VT termination versus 27% with lidocaine in head-to-head comparison, with 67% of patients alive and VT-free at 1 hour versus 9% with lidocaine 3
    • Antiarrhythmic effect may take up to 30 minutes, so it's not ideal for rapid conversion unless the patient is clinically stable 1
  • Procainamide shows the greatest efficacy among medical options for stable monomorphic VT, administered at 10 mg/kg at 50-100 mg/min IV over 10-20 minutes with continuous blood pressure and ECG monitoring 4

  • Lidocaine was historically considered first-choice for VT at 1-3 mg/kg IV (100 mg bolus in cardiac arrest, repeatable after 5-10 minutes), followed by 2-4 mg/min infusion 1

    • However, lidocaine has significantly lower efficacy than amiodarone (27% vs 78% termination rate) and higher drug failure rates (91% vs 33%) 3
    • Lidocaine has no effect on SVT and should not be used for supraventricular arrhythmias 1
  • Magnesium may be effective for VF/VT, particularly when associated with acute myocardial infarction: 8 mmol bolus followed by 2.5 mmol/h infusion 1

Critical Caveat for VTach Treatment

  • Direct current cardioversion must always be available in the emergency setting, as approximately 50% of patients will ultimately require electrical therapy even if initially stable 5
  • Hemodynamic instability and death occur significantly more often when VT occurs during acute myocardial infarction (65% unstable vs 21% in non-AMI patients) 5

Supraventricular Tachycardia (SVTach) Management

Hemodynamically Unstable SVTach

  • Immediate synchronized cardioversion is the treatment of choice for decompensated patients (hypotensive, heart failure, angina, or HR >150 bpm) 1
  • Perform after adequate sedation/anesthesia in stable patients, but immediately without delay in unstable patients 1

Hemodynamically Stable SVTach

Step-wise algorithmic approach:

  1. Vagal maneuvers are first-line intervention 6

    • Modified Valsalva maneuver has approximately 43% success rate 6
    • Carotid sinus massage: apply steady pressure over right or left carotid sinus for 5-10 seconds 1
    • Ice-cold wet towel to face or facial immersion in 10°C water 1, 6
    • Switching between techniques achieves overall 27.7% success rate 1, 6
  2. Adenosine is second-line treatment with 90-95% success rate for orthodromic AVRT and approximately 95% for AVNRT 1, 6

    • Serves both therapeutic and diagnostic purposes by unmasking atrial activity in flutter or atrial tachycardia 6
    • Brief side effects (<1 minute) occur in approximately 30% of patients 1, 6
    • Critical warning: Electrical cardioversion must be immediately available as adenosine may precipitate AF that conducts rapidly to ventricles, potentially causing ventricular fibrillation 1
  3. IV calcium channel blockers or beta-blockers if adenosine fails 6

    • Diltiazem or verapamil are particularly effective for converting AVNRT to sinus rhythm 6
    • Success rates of 80-98% for verapamil, diltiazem, or adenosine in most stable patients 1

Special Situation: Pre-excited Atrial Fibrillation (Accessory Pathway)

This is a life-threatening emergency requiring different management:

  • Synchronized cardioversion for hemodynamically unstable patients with pre-excited AF 1

  • Ibutilide or IV procainamide for hemodynamically stable pre-excited AF 1, 6

    • These agents decrease ventricular rate by slowing conduction over the accessory pathway and may terminate AF 1
  • NEVER use calcium channel blockers (diltiazem, verapamil) or beta-blockers in patients with pre-excitation on ECG 1, 6

    • These agents may enhance conduction over the accessory pathway if SVT converts to AF, potentially leading to ventricular fibrillation and death 6
    • This is a critical pitfall that can be fatal 1, 6

Administration Considerations

  • All life-threatening arrhythmia drugs should be given IV 1
  • Peripheral IV drugs must be followed by 20 mL saline bolus to aid central circulation delivery 1
  • When no venous access exists, drugs (particularly epinephrine) may be given endotracheally in double or triple doses 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.