What are the management and follow-up recommendations for a 47-year-old female with a diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and a negative Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Aptima test, along with other laboratory results?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of ASC-US with Negative HPV in a 47-Year-Old Woman

For a 47-year-old woman with ASC-US and negative HPV testing, repeat co-testing (cytology and HPV) should be performed in 3 years. 1

Primary Management Recommendation

The combination of ASC-US cytology with negative high-risk HPV testing places this patient in a low-risk category that does not require immediate colposcopy or short-interval follow-up. 1, 2

  • The preferred management is repeat co-testing at 3 years, as this patient is over 30 years of age and the negative HPV result provides strong reassurance against high-grade disease. 1

  • The 5-year risk of CIN3+ after HPV-negative/ASC-US is only 0.48%, which is closer to the risk after a negative Pap test (0.31%) than after a negative co-test (0.11%), supporting a 3-year return interval rather than immediate intervention. 2

  • The negative HPV test has a negative predictive value of approximately 99% for excluding high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, making aggressive follow-up unnecessary. 1, 3

Why Not More Aggressive Management?

Colposcopy is not indicated for HPV-negative ASC-US in women over 30 years of age. 1

  • Colposcopy is reserved for HPV-positive ASC-US cases, where the risk of CIN2+ is approximately 11%, compared to only 3.8% in all ASC-US cases regardless of HPV status. 3

  • The American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology guidelines specifically state that reflex HPV testing is the preferred triage method for ASC-US, and only HPV-positive results warrant colposcopy. 1

Alternative Acceptable Options

While 3-year co-testing is preferred, the following are also acceptable:

  • Repeat cytology at 12 months is an acceptable alternative, though less efficient than waiting 3 years given the low risk. 1

  • If repeat cytology at 12 months shows ASC-US or greater, then colposcopy would be indicated. 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not perform repeat testing at 6-month intervals for HPV-negative ASC-US—this is only recommended for cases where HPV testing was not performed or when managing HPV-positive results. 1

Do not order HPV testing at intervals less than 12 months, as this is explicitly discouraged in guidelines and provides no clinical benefit. 1

Do not refer for immediate colposcopy based solely on the ASC-US result when HPV is negative, as this represents overtreatment and exposes the patient to unnecessary procedures. 1

Regarding Other Laboratory Results

The elevated C-reactive protein (16 mg/L) noted in this patient's labs is unrelated to cervical cytology management and should be evaluated separately based on clinical context. The other laboratory values (triglycerides, uric acid, ASO, RF, ANA) do not impact cervical cancer screening recommendations. 1

Key Evidence Supporting This Approach

The 2018 update to cervical cancer screening guidelines emphasizes that HPV-negative with ASC-US results should be followed with co-testing at 3 years, not 5 years, distinguishing this from completely negative co-test results. 1

  • Studies demonstrate that sensitivity of HPV testing for detecting high-grade lesions is 87.5%, with specificity of 72.5%, making the negative result highly reliable. 3

  • The positive predictive value of HPV testing for biopsy-proven HSIL is only 11.3%, but the negative predictive value approaches 99%, supporting conservative management when HPV is negative. 3

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.