Management and Treatment of Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy
Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage Management
For patients with CAA-related intracerebral hemorrhage, aggressive blood pressure control targeting systolic BP 130-150 mmHg is essential, combined with multidisciplinary stroke unit care and early rehabilitation, while avoiding anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents indefinitely. 1, 2
Blood Pressure Control
- Target systolic BP of 130-150 mmHg in the acute phase of ICH to reduce hematoma expansion and cerebral edema 1
- Initiate aggressive BP lowering as soon as CAA-related hemorrhage is identified 1
- Maintain long-term BP control with target <140/90 mmHg (or <130/80 with diabetes/chronic kidney disease) to prevent recurrent hemorrhage 1
Acute Care Setting
- All CAA-ICH patients should receive care in a dedicated stroke unit with multidisciplinary team involvement 1
- Aggressive full care should be provided during the first 48 hours, avoiding premature DNR orders unless pre-existing advance directives exist 1
- Begin rehabilitation as early as possible, continuing into the community with coordinated discharge planning 1
Antithrombotic Management
Anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy should be permanently avoided in patients with diagnosed CAA due to the extremely high risk of recurrent lobar hemorrhage. 1, 3, 4, 5
Anticoagulation Decisions in Atrial Fibrillation
- For CAA patients with atrial fibrillation requiring stroke prevention, left atrial appendage occlusion is the preferred strategy over oral anticoagulation 1
- CAA should be diagnosed using validated clinico-radiological criteria before making anticoagulation decisions 1
- If anticoagulation is absolutely necessary (e.g., mechanical heart valve), NOACs may be considered only after careful risk-benefit analysis, with the understanding that deep ICH location without MRI evidence of CAA carries more favorable risk-benefit than lobar ICH 1
Timing After ICH
- If anticoagulation must be restarted, delay at least 4 weeks beyond the acute phase (>48 hours) 1
- The balance of net benefit is more favorable in deep ICH without neuroimaging evidence of CAA compared to lobar ICH with CAA features 1
- Estimate recurrent ICH risk using ICH location and MRI biomarkers (cerebral microbleeds) before any decision to restart anticoagulation 1
Antiplatelet Therapy
- Avoid antiplatelet agents in elderly patients with known CAA 5
- For patients requiring secondary stroke prevention who have CAA, antiplatelet agents carry lower but still significant hemorrhage risk compared to anticoagulation 1
Prevention of Recurrent Hemorrhage
Strict blood pressure control is the only proven modifiable intervention to reduce CAA-related hemorrhage recurrence, with recurrence rates of 2.1-3.7% per patient-year being substantially higher in lobar locations. 1
Risk Stratification
- Lobar ICH location is the strongest predictor of recurrence, reflecting underlying CAA 1
- Additional risk factors include: older age, apolipoprotein E ε2 or ε4 alleles, greater number of microbleeds on T2*-weighted gradient-echo MRI, and previous hemorrhage history 1
- MRI biomarkers including cerebral microbleeds should be used to estimate recurrent ICH risk 1, 4
Blood Pressure Management
- Perindopril plus indapamide reduced first ICH risk (adjusted HR 0.44,95% CI 0.28-0.69) and showed similar trends for recurrent ICH 1
- This reduction applies to both lobar and deep hemispheric ICH 1
- Maintain lifelong BP control as the primary preventive strategy 1
Diagnostic Approach
CAA diagnosis requires validated clinico-radiological criteria, with MRI being superior to CT for identifying characteristic features including lobar microbleeds, cortical superficial siderosis, and white matter changes. 1, 3, 4
Imaging Requirements
- MRI with gradient-echo or susceptibility-weighted sequences to detect microbleeds and cortical superficial siderosis 3, 4
- Lobar ICH location in elderly patients (>60 years) without other clear cause strongly suggests CAA 3, 4, 6
- Multiple lobar microbleeds on MRI support CAA diagnosis 3, 4
When to Suspect CAA
- Spontaneous lobar ICH in patients >60 years old 6
- Recurrent lobar hemorrhages 6
- Transient focal neurological episodes or convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage 4
- Absence of hypertensive hemorrhage patterns (basal ganglia, thalamus, pons, cerebellum) 1
CAA-Related Inflammation
CAA-related inflammation (CAA-RI) represents a distinct treatable entity requiring immunosuppressive therapy, typically with corticosteroids, when diagnosed in the acute phase. 3, 4
Recognition and Treatment
- CAA-RI triggers an autoimmune inflammatory reaction in a minority of CAA patients 3
- This condition is often responsive to immunosuppressive treatment acutely 3
- Diagnosis requires specific clinical and radiological features distinct from typical CAA 3, 4
- Treatment protocols involve corticosteroids as first-line therapy 4
Surgical Considerations
Surgical evacuation of CAA-related hematomas has not been shown to improve survival and carries risk of recurrent hemorrhage, making it appropriate only for select cases with life-threatening mass effect. 1, 6
Surgical Indications
- Consider surgery only for patients with significant mass effect threatening herniation 1
- Two of five surgically treated CAA patients in one series died from recurrent hemorrhage within two weeks 6
- Prognosis appears poor with recurrent hemorrhage, though some patients have uneventful recovery comparable to other ICH etiologies 6
- Minimally invasive techniques are under investigation but not yet proven superior 1
Future Considerations and Current Limitations
No effective therapeutics currently exist to cure or halt CAA progression, making prevention of hemorrhage through BP control and avoidance of antithrombotics the cornerstone of management. 1, 3, 4