What are the treatment options for vaginal prolapse?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment for Vaginal Prolapse

For symptomatic vaginal prolapse, begin with conservative management including pelvic floor physical therapy and pessaries as first-line treatment, reserving surgery for patients who fail conservative measures and have stage 2 or greater prolapse causing disabling symptoms. 1

Initial Conservative Management

Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy

  • Supervised pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) with a physical therapist is superior to self-taught Kegel exercises and should be the primary conservative approach for mild to moderate prolapse 2, 3
  • PFMT increases the chance of improvement in prolapse stage by 17% compared to no treatment, with benefits in both anatomical correction and symptom reduction 3
  • Six months of supervised PFMT demonstrates benefits for prolapse symptoms and severity, though effectiveness may be limited for high-stage or apical prolapse 2, 3

Pessary Management

  • Pessaries are effective non-surgical options that can be offered alone or in combination with PFMT 1
  • Regular follow-up care is mandatory to minimize complications 2
  • Pessaries are particularly appropriate for patients not desiring surgery or those medically unfit for surgical intervention 4

Lifestyle Modifications

  • Address modifiable risk factors for prolapse progression 1

Surgical Indications

Surgery should be offered when:

  • Conservative options fail to meet patient expectations 1
  • Symptoms are disabling and directly related to prolapse 1
  • Prolapse is stage 2 or greater on POP-Q classification 1
  • Clinical examination confirms significant prolapse 1

Surgical Approach Selection

For Apical and Anterior Prolapse

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is the recommended approach for apical and anterior prolapse, offering superior long-term success compared to vaginal techniques 1, 2

  • Minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (laparoscopic or robotic) is as effective as open abdominal sacrocolpopexy 2
  • Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy are equally effective; choice should be based on surgeon expertise 2
  • Sacrocolpopexy with polypropylene mesh is recommended for younger women, those with severe prolapse, recurrent prolapse after vaginal surgery, or women with short prolapsed vaginas 5

For Vaginal Approaches

  • Uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) and sacrospinous ligament suspension (SSLS) are equally effective at one year and can be combined with vaginal hysterectomy 2
  • Autologous vaginal surgery is recommended for elderly and fragile patients 1
  • Transvaginal repairs are appropriate for older patients, those with primary or less severe prolapse, and those at increased surgical risk 5

For Isolated Posterior Compartment Prolapse (Rectocele)

  • The posterior vaginal route with autologous tissue should be performed preferentially over the transanal route 1
  • Ventral rectopexy is recommended for high rectoceles or those associated with other pelvic floor disorders 6
  • Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection (STARR) can reduce rectocele size (average reduction from 3.8 cm to 1.9 cm), but long-term outcomes are disappointing despite initial improvement 6

For Elderly Patients Not Interested in Sexual Activity

  • Obliterative procedures (colpocleisis) are highly effective with high satisfaction rates and should be considered definitive surgery 2, 5

Important Caveats and Pitfalls

Mesh Considerations

  • The decision to place mesh must be made in consultation with a multidisciplinary team 1
  • Transvaginal mesh shows superior anatomic outcomes in some studies but has higher complication rates and should be reserved for surgeons with adequate training 2
  • Mesh should be used selectively for apical suspensions, as it may improve cure rates but increases risk of complications 5

Surgical Complications

  • Abdominal approaches have longer operating times, increased pain, and higher costs compared to vaginal surgery, despite potentially increased long-term durability 2
  • For rectocele repair, rare but serious complications after STARR include fistula, peritonitis, and bowel perforation 6
  • The correlation between symptom improvement and anatomical correction is often weak; anatomical abnormalities may be caused by underlying functional disorders not corrected by surgery 6

Hysterectomy Decisions

  • Operations for uterovaginal prolapse can be offered with or without hysterectomy, but must include a specific apical support procedure to be effective 5

Postoperative Management

  • Patients should be reassessed by the surgeon even in the absence of symptoms or complications, with long-term follow-up by primary care or specialist 1
  • Slings should be added selectively to reduce postoperative stress incontinence 5
  • An interactive consent process is mandatory given the multiple decisions required regarding surgical route, use of hysterectomy, grafts, slings, and preservation of vaginal capacity for sexual intercourse 5

References

Research

Management of female pelvic organ prolapse-Summary of the 2021 HAS guidelines.

Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction, 2023

Research

Management of apical pelvic organ prolapse.

Current urology reports, 2015

Research

Conservative prevention and management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011

Research

Evaluation and Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2021

Research

Surgical treatment of vaginal apex prolapse.

Obstetrics and gynecology, 2013

Guideline

Management of Rectocele

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.