Association Between Ulcerative Colitis and Pulmonary Embolism
Patients with ulcerative colitis have at least a 2-fold increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), including pulmonary embolism, compared to the general population, with the highest risk occurring during active disease and hospitalization. 1
Magnitude of Risk
The thrombotic risk in UC is substantial and clinically significant:
- UC patients face a 2.0 to 2.85-fold increased risk of VTE compared to healthy controls, with pulmonary embolism being one of the most common manifestations alongside deep vein thrombosis 1
- The risk of thrombosis-related mortality is doubled in UC patients compared to controls 1
- Among hospitalized IBD patients undergoing surgery, VTE occurs in 3.3% of UC patients 1
- VTE-associated mortality is significantly elevated: 37.4 per 1,000 hospitalizations for UC versus 9.9 per 1,000 in non-UC patients (p<0.0001) 1
Pathophysiology and Risk Factors
The mechanism underlying this association involves acquired rather than inherited factors:
- The majority of VTE events occur during active disease phases, as inflammatory activity drives hemostatic alterations that promote thrombosis 1
- Hospitalization independently increases VTE risk 8-fold in UC patients 1
- While inherited thrombophilias (Factor V Leiden, prothrombin mutations) occur at similar rates in UC and general populations, the excess VTE risk stems from acquired inflammatory factors 1
- Most VTE events occur in outpatients who have risk factors such as recent hospitalization, surgery, or active disease 1
Clinical Manifestations
Pulmonary embolism presents alongside other thrombotic complications:
- Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are the most common thromboembolic manifestations 1
- Unusual sites include cerebrovascular, portal, mesenteric, and retinal veins 1
- VTE is associated with longer hospitalizations (11.7 vs 6.1 days in non-VTE patients) 1
- Recurrent VTE is increased in UC patients: 33.4% recur within 5 years after unprovoked first VTE versus 21.7% in non-IBD patients (relative risk 2.5, p=0.001) 1
Prevention Strategies
All hospitalized UC patients should receive thromboprophylaxis, particularly those with acute severe disease:
- Prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), unfractionated heparin (UFH), or fondaparinux is recommended for all hospitalized UC patients 1
- Both mechanical thromboprophylaxis and pharmacological prophylaxis should be considered in at-risk patients 1
- Rectal bleeding is NOT a contraindication to VTE prophylaxis in UC patients 1, 2
- Extended thromboprophylaxis following hospital discharge should be considered, especially post-surgery 2
Critical Safety Data
A common pitfall is withholding anticoagulation due to bleeding concerns:
- In a meta-analysis of 8 RCTs evaluating heparin in UC (268 patients), only 6 patients had increased rectal bleeding, with only 3 requiring study withdrawal and 1 requiring urgent surgery 1, 2
- Major gastrointestinal bleeding with anticoagulant therapy is rare 1, 2
- The British Society of Gastroenterology (2025) explicitly states that patients with acute severe UC should receive prophylactic LMWH despite bleeding risk 1
Treatment of Established PE
When pulmonary embolism occurs in UC patients:
- Treatment should follow standard antithrombotic therapy guidelines and is independent of the UC diagnosis 1
- Anticoagulation should continue for at least 3 months using LMWH, UFH, or fondaparinux initially, followed by vitamin K antagonists 1
- Long-term anticoagulation should be considered for patients with a second episode of unprovoked VTE 1
- Novel oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been successfully used in case reports, though guideline evidence primarily supports traditional agents 3, 4
Clinical Implications
The threshold for investigating VTE should be lower in UC patients, especially those with active disease 1
- Diagnosis follows standard protocols: ultrasound for DVT, ventilation-perfusion scan or CT pulmonary angiography for PE 1
- VTE often presents with non-specific symptoms and should be considered in all UC patients with compatible clinical features 1
- Patient education should address modifiable risk factors including oral contraceptive use and long-distance travel 1
Real-World Implementation Gap
Despite clear guidelines, a critical practice gap exists:
- In one retrospective study of 336 hospitalized severe UC patients, only 7% received adequate pharmacological prophylaxis for >80% of their hospitalization 5
- Factors associated with failure to prescribe prophylaxis included hematochezia, elevated platelets, younger male patients, and admission on biologics 5