Are Breo (fluticasone vilanterol) and Trelegy (fluticasone vilanterol umeclidinium) the same class of medication for COPD?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Are Breo and Trelegy the Same Class of Medication for COPD?

No, Breo (fluticasone/vilanterol) and Trelegy (fluticasone/umeclidinium/vilanterol) are not the same class—Breo is a dual therapy combining an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) with a long-acting beta-agonist (LABA), while Trelegy is a triple therapy that adds a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) to the ICS/LABA combination. 1, 2

Medication Composition and Classification

Breo Ellipta (Fluticasone Furoate/Vilanterol)

  • Contains two drug classes: 3
    • Fluticasone furoate (ICS)
    • Vilanterol (LABA)
  • Classification: ICS/LABA dual combination therapy 4

Trelegy Ellipta (Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol)

  • Contains three drug classes: 1, 2
    • Fluticasone furoate (ICS)
    • Umeclidinium (LAMA)
    • Vilanterol (LABA)
  • Classification: ICS/LAMA/LABA triple combination therapy 4

Clinical Positioning in COPD Treatment

When to Use Breo (ICS/LABA Dual Therapy)

Breo is appropriate for patients with moderate to high symptom burden (CAT ≥10, mMRC ≥2) and impaired lung function (FEV₁ <80% predicted) who have concomitant asthma features. 4 However, LAMA/LABA dual therapy is generally preferred over ICS/LABA in COPD patients without asthma due to superior lung function improvements and lower pneumonia risk. 4

When to Use Trelegy (Triple Therapy)

Trelegy is indicated for patients at high risk of exacerbations (≥2 moderate exacerbations or ≥1 severe exacerbation requiring hospitalization in the past year) with moderate to high symptom burden and impaired lung function (FEV₁ <80% predicted). 4

  • Triple therapy demonstrates greater reduction in exacerbation rates compared to dual therapies 2, 5
  • Single-inhaler triple therapy (like Trelegy) is preferred over multiple-inhaler combinations 4

Comparative Efficacy Evidence

Lung Function

Triple therapy with fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol produces significantly greater improvements in FEV₁ compared to ICS/LABA dual therapy. 5, 6 The addition of umeclidinium (LAMA) to fluticasone/vilanterol provides sustained bronchodilation beyond what ICS/LABA alone achieves. 2

Exacerbation Prevention

Triple therapy is more effective than ICS/LABA combinations at reducing moderate-to-severe exacerbation rates. 2, 5 The IMPACT study demonstrated that umeclidinium/fluticasone furoate/vilanterol had greater effects on reducing exacerbations compared to fluticasone furoate/vilanterol dual therapy. 2

Important Clinical Caveats

Pneumonia Risk

ICS-containing regimens (both Breo and Trelegy) carry an increased risk of pneumonia compared to bronchodilator-only therapy. 4 This risk must be weighed against exacerbation reduction benefits, particularly in patients with frequent exacerbations. 4

Stepwise Approach

Current guidelines recommend starting with LAMA/LABA dual therapy (not ICS/LABA) for most symptomatic COPD patients, reserving triple therapy for those with persistent exacerbations despite dual bronchodilator therapy. 4 The exception is patients with COPD and concomitant asthma, where ICS/LABA (Breo) may be the initial dual therapy choice. 4

Avoiding ICS Monotherapy

Neither medication should be used as ICS monotherapy—inhaled corticosteroids in COPD must always be combined with long-acting bronchodilators. 4 ICS monotherapy is specifically recommended against in all patients with stable COPD at low risk of exacerbations due to lack of benefit and increased adverse event risk. 4

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.