Treatment Options for With-the-Rule and Against-the-Rule Astigmatism
Full cylindrical correction with eyeglasses, toric contact lenses, or refractive surgery effectively treats both with-the-rule and against-the-rule astigmatism, though adults with previously uncorrected astigmatism may require gradual correction to improve tolerance. 1, 2
Understanding Astigmatism Orientation
- With-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism has the steepest corneal meridian oriented vertically (approximately 90 degrees), commonly seen in children and younger adults 1, 2
- Against-the-rule (ATR) astigmatism has the steepest meridian oriented horizontally (approximately 180 degrees), more prevalent in older adults and tends to remain stable over time 1, 2
Eyeglass Correction
Eyeglasses should be considered as first-line treatment before contact lenses or refractive surgery for both WTR and ATR astigmatism. 1
- Full cylindrical correction may not be needed initially, particularly for adults with regular astigmatism 1, 2
- Adults with previously uncorrected or partially corrected astigmatism poorly tolerate substantial changes in axis or power 1, 2
- High-index lenses reduce thickness and weight for higher refractive errors, improving comfort and cosmetic appearance 1
- Optimal correction for higher refractive errors requires precision in fitting, especially regarding optical center position relative to the pupil 1
Contact Lens Options
Low to Moderate Astigmatism (Less Than 3.00 D)
- Soft toric contact lenses or rigid gas-permeable (RGP) contact lenses effectively correct low to moderate astigmatism 2
- Custom-designed soft toric lenses provide good centration, flexible wear schedules, and improved comfort 2
High Astigmatism (3.00 D or More)
- Rigid gas-permeable and hybrid contact lenses are highly effective for high astigmatism 2
- Bitoric or back-surface toric designs minimize corneal bearing and improve centration for greater amounts of corneal astigmatism 2
- RGP scleral lenses (diameter >17mm) are excellent options for high and/or irregular astigmatism, particularly with anisometropia 2
Orthokeratology Considerations
- Toric orthokeratology reduces WTR astigmatism by approximately 50% on average but cannot completely eliminate pre-existing astigmatism 3
- Best suited for patients with 1.00 D to 1.50 D or less of pre-fitting astigmatism, as higher amounts show less predictable outcomes 3
- Patients may prefer toric orthokeratology subjectively despite reduced visual acuity compared to soft toric multifocal lenses 4
Surgical Correction
Refractive Surgery Planning
- Axis alignment and cyclotorsion compensation are critical for astigmatism correction, as misalignment significantly reduces treatment effectiveness 1
- Reference marks should be placed on the operative eye while the patient is seated upright before laser procedures to compensate for ocular cyclotorsion when supine 1
- Larger optical zones (6.5-6.8 mm) result in less undercorrection and fewer higher-order aberrations, particularly in high myopia, but require sufficient corneal thickness 1
Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction (KLEx)
- Corrects astigmatism ranging from 0.25 D to 5.00 D, though higher target astigmatism shows weaker correction effects 1
- Cyclotorsion compensation significantly improves outcomes with lower residual astigmatism 1
- Low astigmatism (<2.0 D) achieves better corrective effects than high astigmatism (>2.0 D) 1
Cataract Surgery with Astigmatism Correction
The choice of astigmatism correction method during cataract surgery depends on the magnitude of astigmatism:
- Low astigmatism (1.00 D): Clear corneal incision (CCI) on the steepest meridian is effective and requires no extra skills or tools 5
- Medium astigmatism (1.00-2.00 D): Opposed clear corneal incisions (OCCI) provide greater astigmatic reduction 5
- High astigmatism (2.00-3.00 D): Toric intraocular lens implantation is superior with proper preoperative planning 5
Posterior Corneal Astigmatism Considerations
- WTR eyes: Apply a coefficient of adjustment of 0.75 to anterior corneal astigmatism values to avoid overcorrection when calculating toric IOL power (for IOL cylinders ≤2.00 D) 6
- ATR eyes: Apply a coefficient of adjustment of 1.41 to avoid undercorrection when calculating toric IOL power (for IOL cylinders ≤2.00 D) 6
- These adjustments account for the effect of posterior corneal curvature not captured by anterior measurements alone 6
Common Pitfalls
- Attempting full cylindrical correction immediately in adults with previously uncorrected astigmatism leads to poor tolerance; gradual correction is better accepted 1, 2
- Irregular astigmatism (seen in keratoconus, corneal scarring, post-surgical corneas) cannot be fully corrected with spherocylindrical lenses and requires specialty contact lenses or surgical intervention 2
- Failing to compensate for cyclotorsion during refractive surgery results in axis misalignment and reduced astigmatic correction 1
- Calculating toric IOL power based solely on anterior corneal measurements without adjusting for posterior corneal astigmatism leads to systematic overcorrection in WTR eyes and undercorrection in ATR eyes 6