Is a significant 6-8 mm Ventricular Septal Defect (VSD) with left to right shunt indicated for device closure, and what are the alternatives if a device or delivery system is not available?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

VSD Device Closure for 6-8 mm Defect with Left-to-Right Shunt

A 6-8 mm VSD with significant left-to-right shunt is indicated for closure when hemodynamic criteria are met (Qp:Qs ≥1.5:1 with evidence of left ventricular volume overload), and surgical closure is the preferred method, though device closure may be considered for muscular VSDs in specific anatomic situations. 1

Primary Indication Assessment

The most critical determination is whether your patient meets hemodynamic thresholds for closure:

Class I Indication (Strongest Recommendation)

  • Closure is definitively indicated when Qp:Qs ≥1.5:1 with evidence of left ventricular volume overload, PA systolic pressure <50% systemic, and pulmonary vascular resistance <1/3 systemic. 1
  • An alternative Class I threshold is Qp:Qs ≥2.0 with clinical evidence of LV volume overload. 1

Class IIa Indication (Reasonable to Proceed)

  • Closure is reasonable when Qp:Qs >1.5:1 with PA pressure <2/3 systemic and PVR <2/3 systemic, particularly if LV systolic or diastolic dysfunction is present. 1

Surgical vs. Device Closure Decision Algorithm

Surgical Closure (Standard Approach)

  • All VSD closures should be performed by surgeons with training and expertise in congenital heart disease. 1
  • Surgical patch closure (typically Dacron or Gore-Tex) is the standard approach for perimembranous VSDs, which represent the majority of cases. 1

Device Closure Considerations

  • Device closure of muscular VSDs may be considered (Class IIb) when the defect is remote from the tricuspid valve and aorta, especially with severe left-sided chamber enlargement or pulmonary hypertension. 1
  • The 2008 ACC/AHA guidelines specifically note that device closure is appropriate for residual defects after prior surgical attempts, restrictive VSDs with significant shunts, or iatrogenic defects post-aortic valve replacement. 1

When Device Closure is NOT Available: Surgical Alternatives

If device closure is unavailable or contraindicated, proceed with:

  • Standard surgical patch closure via cardiopulmonary bypass using synthetic material (Dacron or polytetrafluoroethylene). 1
  • Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography is essential to identify additional muscular VSDs that may only manifest after closure of the dominant defect. 1

Critical Contraindications to Any Closure

VSD closure should NOT be performed when: 1

  • PA systolic pressure >2/3 systemic
  • Pulmonary vascular resistance >2/3 systemic
  • Net right-to-left shunt is present (Eisenmenger physiology)

These patients have severe irreversible pulmonary arterial hypertension, and closure will cause acute right ventricular failure and death. 1

Special Clinical Scenarios Favoring Closure

Beyond hemodynamic criteria, closure is indicated for:

  • History of infective endocarditis caused by the VSD (Class I indication). 1
  • Worsening aortic regurgitation caused by perimembranous or supracristal VSD (Class IIa for surgical closure). 1

Device-Specific Evidence for 6-8 mm VSDs

Research data supports device closure for this size range:

  • A 10-year retrospective study showed 97% successful device implantation in adult VSDs with median size 6 mm, with 71% immediate complete closure and marked symptom improvement in 64% of symptomatic patients. 2
  • Amplatzer Duct Occluder II devices have been successfully used for perimembranous VSDs up to 6 mm with no atrioventricular block during mean 2.5-year follow-up. 3
  • However, the evidence notes that device closure is technically more challenging for perimembranous defects near cardiac valves compared to muscular defects. 2, 4

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not underestimate defect size: Underestimation led to treatment failure and death in one surgical series using intraoperative devices. 5
  • Assess for multiple VSDs: Additional muscular defects may only become apparent after closure of the dominant defect. 1
  • Monitor for complete heart block: This complication can occur months after device closure, particularly with perimembranous defects, requiring permanent pacemaker placement. 3, 6
  • Exclude aortic valve prolapse: Small VSDs with aortic valve involvement may develop progressive aortic regurgitation requiring intervention. 1

Follow-Up Requirements

  • Patients undergoing device closure require follow-up every 1-2 years at an Adult Congenital Heart Disease (ACHD) center. 1
  • Those with residual shunts, heart failure, PAH, or valvular complications require annual ACHD center evaluation. 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Percutaneous device closure of congenital and iatrogenic ventricular septal defects in adult patients.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2011

Research

Surgical closure of muscular ventricular septal defects using double umbrella devices (intraoperative VSD device closure).

European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 1997

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.