What is the treatment for a patient with a wedge compression fracture?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment of Wedge Compression Fractures

Initial conservative management with pain control is the first-line treatment for most osteoporotic wedge compression fractures, with vertebral augmentation (kyphoplasty preferred over vertebroplasty) reserved for patients who fail conservative therapy after 3 months or have persistent severe pain. 1

Initial Assessment and Triage

Determine fracture etiology and stability first:

  • Assess for neurologic deficits (motor, sensory, bowel/bladder function) - their presence mandates immediate surgical consultation 1, 2
  • Evaluate for malignancy if patient has known cancer history or atypical features - MRI is imperative in these cases 1
  • Check for spinal instability indicators: >10% dorsal wall height reduction, >20% vertebral body height loss, or retropulsion of bone fragments 1, 2
  • Document baseline neurological examination carefully to avoid missing instability 2

Conservative Management (First-Line)

For neurologically intact patients with stable fractures:

Pharmacologic Management

  • Calcitonin 200 IU (nasal or subcutaneous) for 4 weeks - this is a moderate-strength recommendation showing clinically important pain reduction at 1,2,3, and 4 weeks 1
  • Analgesics as needed for pain control (though evidence for opioids is inconclusive) 1
  • Ibandronate or strontium ranelate to prevent additional symptomatic fractures (weak recommendation) 1

Physical Measures

  • Pain control with appropriate analgesics 2
  • Cervical collar may be considered for comfort if cervical involvement 2
  • Evidence for bracing is inconclusive - neither age nor level of fracture clearly predicts benefit 1
  • Evidence for supervised exercise programs is inconclusive 1

Natural History

  • Most healing compression fractures show gradual improvement in pain over 2-12 weeks with variable return of function 1, 2
  • Discharge with outpatient follow-up is appropriate for stable fractures 2

Vertebral Augmentation - When Conservative Management Fails

Critical timing consideration: Patients who have not achieved sufficient pain relief by 3 months with conservative treatment are candidates for vertebral augmentation 1

Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty Decision

Kyphoplasty is preferred over vertebroplasty for the following reasons:

  • Both procedures are equally effective for pain reduction and disability improvement 1
  • Kyphoplasty provides superior functional recovery due to better correction of spinal deformity (improved kyphotic angle and increased vertebral body height) 1
  • Kyphoplasty has less cement leakage compared to vertebroplasty 1
  • The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons has a strong recommendation AGAINST vertebroplasty 1
  • Kyphoplasty is a weak recommendation FOR use in neurologically intact patients 1

Benefits of Vertebral Augmentation

  • Immediate and considerable improvement in pain and patient mobility 1
  • Prevents secondary sequelae: decreased bone mineral density, muscle strength loss with immobility, increased DVT risk, cardiovascular/respiratory deconditioning 1
  • Improves pulmonary function through better alignment and decreased pain 1
  • Fracture age does not independently affect outcomes - both acute (<6 weeks) and chronic (>12 weeks) fractures benefit equally 1

Special Population: Malignancy-Related Fractures

For patients with known malignancy and vertebral compression fractures:

  • Kyphoplasty shows superior outcomes - in the Cancer Patient Fracture Evaluation RCT, kyphoplasty improved Roland-Morris disability scores by 8.3 points at 1 month vs 0.1 points with conservative management (p<0.0001) 1
  • Advantages include immediate pain relief, avoiding delays in chemoradiation, outpatient care, tissue biopsy capability, and potential antitumor effect of bone cement 1
  • Use SINS (Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score) to evaluate stability: stable (0-6), potentially unstable (7-12), unstable (13-18) 1
  • Radiation therapy should be performed 2-4 weeks following orthopedic procedures (30 Gy in 10 fractions or 20 Gy in 5 fractions) 1

Surgical Consultation - Immediate Indications

Refer immediately for surgical evaluation if:

  • Neurologic deficits present 1, 2
  • Significant spinal deformity (>15% kyphosis or >10% scoliosis) 2
  • Spinal instability or retropulsion of bone fragments into spinal canal 1, 2
  • Worsening symptoms despite medical management 1

Additional Surgical Consultation Uses

  • Prescribing and supervising immobilization devices 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not use vertebroplasty as first-line vertebral augmentation - kyphoplasty is superior for functional outcomes 1
  • Do not delay vertebral augmentation indefinitely - if no improvement by 3 months with conservative care, proceed with intervention 1
  • Do not miss malignancy - obtain MRI in patients with cancer history or atypical features 1
  • Do not overlook neurologic examination - careful baseline documentation is essential to detect instability 2
  • Do not use radiation therapy for non-pathologic fractures - RT is reserved only for confirmed metastatic disease 1

Special Considerations for L3/L4 Fractures

  • L2 nerve root block is an option for treating pain associated with L3 or L4 compression fractures in neurologically intact patients (weak recommendation) 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Vertebral Compression Fractures

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.