On post-bronchodilator (after administration of a bronchodilator medication) testing, do I look at the best result for the Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV-1) to Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) ratio, or the predicted value?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Post-Bronchodilator FEV1/FVC Interpretation

You should use the best measured value (not percent predicted) of the post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio and compare it to the absolute threshold of 0.70 or the lower limit of normal (LLN), not to a predicted value. The FEV1/FVC ratio itself does not have a "percent predicted" value that is clinically meaningful for interpretation 1.

Key Interpretation Principles

The FEV1/FVC Ratio is Reported as a Decimal

  • The FEV1/FVC ratio should be reported as a decimal fraction (e.g., 0.65), and the space for percent predicted value should be left blank to minimize miscommunications 1.
  • This is a critical reporting standard from the American Thoracic Society because the ratio is an inherently relative measure that doesn't require normalization to predicted values 1.

What "Best Result" Means

  • For post-bronchodilator testing, you use the best FEV1 and best FVC values from acceptable maneuvers to calculate the FEV1/FVC ratio 1.
  • The "best" refers to the highest measured values from technically acceptable efforts, not any comparison to predicted values 1.

Clinical Application

For Diagnosis of Airflow Obstruction

  • Compare the measured post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio to either the fixed threshold of 0.70 or the LLN (typically a z-score of -1.64) 1, 2.
  • A post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.70 is the GOLD guideline criterion for confirming COPD diagnosis 3, 2.
  • The LLN approach may be more appropriate for older adults to avoid over-diagnosis 4.

For Assessing Severity

  • Disease severity classification is based on the post-bronchodilator FEV1 percent predicted, NOT the FEV1/FVC ratio 1, 5.
  • The post-bronchodilator FEV1 % predicted is a better predictor of mortality and clinical outcomes than pre-bronchodilator values 5.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not look for a "predicted" FEV1/FVC ratio value - this is not how the ratio is interpreted and doing so leads to confusion 1.
  • Do not use pre-bronchodilator values for diagnosis - COPD diagnosis specifically requires post-bronchodilator spirometry showing FEV1/FVC < 0.70 3, 2, 4.
  • Do not confuse the ratio interpretation with individual parameter interpretation - while FEV1 and FVC are compared to predicted values, the ratio is compared to absolute thresholds 1.

Bronchodilator Response Assessment

  • When assessing bronchodilator response itself, you evaluate the change in FEV1 and FVC (not the ratio) using both percent change from baseline (>12%) and absolute change (>200 mL) 1, 6.
  • The FEV1/FVC ratio can be misleading for assessing bronchodilator response if expiratory time changes 1.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.