What are the steps for the initial visit of a patient with microscopic hematuria?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Initial Visit Evaluation for Microscopic Hematuria

Begin with a detailed history focusing on malignancy risk factors, physical examination including blood pressure, and serum creatinine measurement to determine whether the patient requires urologic evaluation, nephrologic evaluation, or both. 1

Step 1: Confirm True Hematuria

  • Obtain microscopic urinalysis to verify ≥3 red blood cells per high-power field on two of three properly collected specimens 1
  • Do not rely solely on dipstick testing, as it can yield false positives from myoglobinuria, hemoglobinuria, or menstrual contamination 2
  • In women, perform urethral and vaginal examination to exclude local causes; obtain catheterized specimen if clean-catch cannot be reliably obtained due to vaginal contamination or obesity 1
  • In uncircumcised men, retract foreskin to expose glans penis; if phimosis present, obtain catheterized specimen 1

Step 2: Exclude Benign Transient Causes

  • Rule out menstruation, vigorous exercise, sexual activity, viral illness, trauma, and infection 1, 3
  • If urinary tract infection suspected, obtain urine culture before antibiotics, treat if positive, then repeat urinalysis 6 weeks post-treatment 2, 4
  • If benign cause identified, repeat urinalysis 48 hours after cessation of the activity 1, 4
  • No additional evaluation warranted if hematuria resolves after addressing benign cause 1

Step 3: Detailed History and Physical Examination

Obtain the following specific information:

  • Age and sex for risk stratification 1
  • Detailed smoking history with pack-year quantification (never smoker/<10 pack-years/10-30 pack-years/>30 pack-years) 1
  • Occupational exposures to chemicals, dyes, benzenes, or aromatic amines 1, 4
  • History of gross hematuria (even if not currently present) 1
  • Irritative voiding symptoms 1, 4
  • Previous urologic disorders or recurrent urinary tract infections 1, 4
  • Family history of urologic malignancies 1
  • Measure blood pressure at initial visit 1

Step 4: Laboratory Analysis

  • Comprehensive urinalysis with sediment examination to determine number of RBCs per high-power field 1
  • Assess RBC morphology: >80% dysmorphic RBCs suggests glomerular origin; >80% normal RBCs suggests lower urinary tract origin 1
  • Look for red cell casts (indicates glomerular disease) 1, 3
  • Test for proteinuria: if ≥1+ on dipstick, obtain 24-hour urine collection to quantitate 1, 3
  • Measure serum creatinine 1

Step 5: Risk Stratification Using 2025 AUA/SUFU System

Low/Negligible Risk (0%-0.4% malignancy risk) - ALL criteria must be met: 1

  • 3-10 RBC/HPF
  • Women <60 years OR men <40 years
  • Never smoker or <10 pack-years
  • No additional risk factors for urothelial cancer

Intermediate Risk (0.2%-3.1% malignancy risk) - ONE or more criteria: 1

  • 11-25 RBC/HPF
  • Women ≥60 years OR men 40-59 years
  • 10-30 pack-years smoking history
  • Any additional risk factors for urothelial cancer

High Risk (1.3%-6.3% malignancy risk) - ONE or more criteria: 1

  • 25 RBC/HPF

  • Men ≥60 years (women cannot be categorized as high-risk based on age alone)
  • 30 pack-years smoking history

  • One or more risk factors PLUS any high-risk feature

Step 6: Determine Evaluation Pathway

If Glomerular Source Suspected (any of the following):

  • Proteinuria >500 mg/24 hours 1, 3
  • 80% dysmorphic RBCs 1, 3

  • Red cell casts present 1, 3
  • Elevated serum creatinine 1

Action: Refer to nephrology for evaluation of primary renal disease, which may include assessment for systemic diseases (lupus, vasculitis, infections) and consideration of renal biopsy 1

If Non-Glomerular Source (Urologic Evaluation Required):

For Low-Risk Patients: 1

  • Shared decision-making regarding repeat urinalysis in 6 months versus proceeding with cystoscopy and urinary tract ultrasound

For Intermediate-Risk Patients: 1

  • Cystoscopy and upper urinary tract imaging (CT urography preferred by ACR with 92% sensitivity and 93% specificity) 1, 2
  • Voided urinary cytology may be performed 1

For High-Risk Patients: 1

  • Cystoscopy (mandatory for bladder visualization) 2
  • CT urography for upper tract imaging 1, 2
  • Voided urinary cytology recommended 1

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never attribute microscopic hematuria solely to anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy without complete evaluation—these medications may unmask pathology but do not cause hematuria 2, 4
  • Do not skip urologic evaluation even if glomerular disease identified—both conditions can coexist 2
  • Women are significantly underreferred (8-28% vs 36-47% in men) despite having similar evaluation requirements 2
  • Patients with isolated hematuria (negative initial urologic evaluation, no glomerular bleeding) still require follow-up for development of hypertension, renal insufficiency, or proteinuria 1

Follow-Up for Negative Initial Evaluation

  • Repeat urinalysis at 6,12,24, and 36 months 4, 3
  • Monitor blood pressure at each visit 4, 3
  • Consider nephrology referral if hematuria persists with development of hypertension, proteinuria, or evidence of glomerular bleeding 4, 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Evaluation and Management of Visible Hematuria

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Urinalysis with Proteinuria and Hematuria

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Hematuria in the Outpatient Setting

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.