Does radiation exposure in a dental clinic increase the risk of thyroid cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Radiation Exposure in Dental Clinics and Thyroid Cancer Risk

Modern dental radiography with current equipment and thyroid shielding poses minimal to negligible thyroid cancer risk, but historical evidence from early dental practices and multiple unshielded exposures suggests cumulative radiation can increase thyroid cancer risk, particularly when exposure occurs at younger ages.

Understanding the Historical Context

The evidence regarding dental radiation and thyroid cancer must be interpreted through the lens of evolving technology and safety practices:

  • Historical dental practices carried documented cancer risks. Early dentists who routinely held X-ray films in patients' mouths developed skin changes and cancers, many requiring digit amputation after years of radiation dermatitis 1.

  • The thyroid gland is highly susceptible to radiation carcinogenesis, with ionizing radiation being the only established environmental risk factor for thyroid cancer 2, 3, 4.

  • Age at exposure is critical. Greater risk for papillary thyroid carcinoma occurs in subjects exposed at younger ages, as demonstrated by the 80-fold increase in thyroid tumors among children following the Chernobyl nuclear accident 2.

Current Evidence on Dental X-Ray Risk

Meta-Analysis Findings

Multiple or repeated exposures to dental X-rays are associated with increased thyroid cancer risk, though the absolute risk remains relatively small:

  • A 2019 systematic review and meta-analysis of 26 studies including 10,868 cancer patients found that multiple dental X-ray exposures were significantly associated with increased thyroid cancer risk (pooled RR = 1.87,95% CI 1.11-3.15) 5.

  • A 2010 case-control study in Kuwait demonstrated a dose-response relationship, with dental X-ray exposure associated with more than doubled thyroid cancer risk (OR = 2.1,95% CI 1.4-3.1, p=0.001) 3.

Important Caveats and Limitations

These findings must be interpreted cautiously due to several methodological concerns:

  • Most studies are retrospective case-control designs subject to recall bias, as patients with cancer may remember exposures differently than healthy controls 5.

  • Studies did not include individual organ doses or specific ages at exposure, limiting precise risk quantification 5.

  • The association with dental X-rays in the US Radiologic Technologists Study was driven entirely by exposures before 1970, with no evidence of increased risk from modern dental radiography 6.

  • Paradoxically, the dental X-ray association was not stronger for childhood/adolescent exposures as would be expected if radiation were the true cause, raising questions about confounding 6.

Modern Safety Standards Dramatically Reduce Risk

Current dental radiography technology and protective measures have reduced thyroid exposure dramatically:

  • Thyroid shields and improved equipment/technology have substantially decreased radiation doses compared to historical practices 5, 7.

  • Modern dental X-rays deliver very low radiation doses, far below the levels associated with established cancer risks 7, 4.

  • There is no clear evidence that modern diagnostic X-ray procedures that expose the thyroid to higher doses than dental X-rays increase thyroid cancer risk, which questions whether the dental X-ray association reflects true causation 6.

Risk Quantification in Context

To understand the magnitude of potential risk from occupational dental radiation exposure:

  • The risk of fatal cancer from whole-body X-ray exposure is approximately 0.04% per rem (4% per Sv) based on medical radiation levels 1.

  • A lifetime dose equivalent of 1 rem is associated with 0.04% fatal cancer risk 1.

  • For dental professionals using proper shielding, annual exposure should be minimal (assistant technicians in catheterization labs, a higher-exposure setting, average 0-2 mSv/year) 1.

Clinical Recommendations for Dental Practice

For Dental Professionals

Implement comprehensive radiation protection protocols:

  • Use thyroid shields for all patients during dental radiography 7.

  • Apply the three basic principles: justification (only image when benefits outweigh risks), optimization (use lowest effective dose), and dose limits 7.

  • Ensure proper collimation and modern equipment to minimize scatter radiation 7.

  • Monitor occupational exposure with dosimetry badges, particularly for high-volume practices 1.

For Patients

The individual risk from modern dental X-rays with proper shielding is very low, but cumulative exposure matters:

  • Request thyroid shielding for all dental radiographic procedures 7.

  • Ensure dental X-rays are clinically justified and not performed routinely without indication 5, 7.

  • Pregnant patients require special consideration, with imaging limited to essential procedures only 7.

For High-Risk Populations

Individuals with genetic syndromes (PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome, DICER1 syndrome) have baseline increased thyroid cancer risk and should minimize additional radiation exposure when possible 2.

  • These patients require annual thyroid ultrasound screening beginning at age 7 2.

  • Dental radiography should be particularly judicious in these populations, though no specific guidelines prohibit necessary imaging 2.

Public Health Perspective

Although individual risk from modern dental radiography is likely very low, the population-level impact could be significant given that approximately one-third of the general population in developed countries receives one or more dental X-rays annually 5.

  • The dramatic increase in thyroid cancer incidence over recent decades may be partly attributable to increased detection, but contribution from cumulative low-dose radiation exposure cannot be excluded 2, 4.

  • Prospective studies based on dental X-ray records with patient follow-up are needed to clarify cancer risks associated with modern dental radiography technology 5.

Key Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not assume zero risk from low-dose radiation. There is no established "safe" level of radiation exposure, and lack of evidence does not denote absence of risk 7.

  • Do not rely solely on historical data. Risk estimates from pre-1970 dental practices substantially overestimate risks from current technology 6.

  • Do not neglect thyroid shielding. This simple measure provides substantial dose reduction and should be standard practice 7.

  • Do not perform routine screening dental X-rays without clinical indication. Each exposure should be justified by expected diagnostic benefit 5, 7.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Thyroid Cancer: Risks and Preventive Measures

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Dental x-rays and the risk of thyroid cancer: a case-control study.

Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2010

Research

Radiation shielding in dentistry: an update.

Australian dental journal, 2016

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.