How to assess a valve in a patient with a history of mechanical aortic valve replacement?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Assessment of Mechanical Aortic Valve Prosthesis

In patients with mechanical aortic valve replacement, urgent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is mandatory as the first-line assessment, followed by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in all cases except when TTE is entirely conclusive, with particular attention to prosthetic valve dysfunction including obstruction, regurgitation, and patient-prosthesis mismatch. 1

Initial Assessment Framework

Essential Pre-Imaging Information

Before performing echocardiography, document the following critical information:

  • Prosthesis specifications: Type (mechanical valve model), size, and date of implantation 1
  • Clinical presentation: Symptoms (heart failure, syncope, thromboembolism), presence of new murmur, fever, or signs of endocarditis 1
  • Hemodynamic parameters: Current blood pressure and heart rate at time of examination 1
  • Patient metrics: Height, weight, and body surface area for indexed calculations 1
  • Review operative report: Confirms prosthesis brand, model, device number, and implantation technique 1

Multimodality Imaging Algorithm

Step 1: Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE)

  • 2D imaging assessment should evaluate:

    • Prosthetic valve leaflet/occluder morphology and mobility 1
    • Sewing ring integrity and stability (assess for rocking motion indicating dehiscence) 1
    • Left ventricular size, wall thickness, systolic and diastolic function 1
    • Presence of calcification or abnormal structures on valve components 1
  • Doppler hemodynamic assessment must include:

    • Peak velocity and mean transvalvular gradient (normal mechanical aortic valve shows peak velocity >2 m/s with mean gradient typically <10 mmHg) 1, 2
    • Spectral Doppler envelope characteristics (normal shows triangular envelope with short acceleration time <80 ms) 1
    • Effective orifice area (EOA) calculation using continuity equation 1, 2
    • Doppler velocity index (DVI) calculation 1

Step 2: Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE)

  • TEE is required except when TTE is entirely conclusive 1
  • Prosthetic valves must be evaluated by an expert in both TTE and TEE in emergency settings 1
  • 3D TEE is now the preferred modality as it provides en face viewing of the entire prosthesis and sewing ring 1
  • Mid-esophageal views at 45° and 120° provide optimal short- and long-axis visualization of valve closure, opening, and regurgitation 1

Step 3: Cardiac CT When Indicated

  • CT should be considered when echocardiography cannot clearly delineate anatomy in suspected paravalvular infections 1
  • CT is particularly useful for mechanical valves as it is less affected by shadowing artifacts than ultrasound 1
  • CT allows evaluation of occluder motion and visualization of thrombus or pannus limiting valve function 1
  • Fluoroscopy should be undertaken when doubt remains regarding mechanical prosthesis function 1

Specific Dysfunction Patterns to Assess

Prosthetic Valve Obstruction

Key diagnostic features:

  • Increased mean transvalvular gradients with prolonged acceleration time (AT >100 ms) and AT/ejection time ratio >0.37 suggest obstruction 1
  • Direct observation of restricted occluder motion on 2D imaging 1
  • Obstruction typically due to thrombosis (most common in mechanical valves) or pannus formation 1
  • Fluoroscopy and/or CT should be considered if obstruction is suspected to identify thrombus or pannus 1

Critical distinction: High gradients alone do not confirm obstruction—must distinguish from patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) by comparing measured EOA to normal reference values for that specific prosthesis model 2

Prosthetic Valve Regurgitation

Assessment approach:

  • Paraprosthetic regurgitation is more common than transvalvular regurgitation in mechanical valves 1
  • Abnormal mobility/rocking of the prosthesis sewing ring nearly always implies severe paraprosthetic regurgitation 1

Severity grading for paraprosthetic leaks:

  • Measure extent of prosthetic circumference showing leakage on short-axis views 1
  • >20% of circumference indicates severe regurgitation 1
  • Premature mitral valve closure indicates catastrophic aortic prosthetic regurgitation 1
  • New paraprosthetic leakage in acute setting is predominantly due to endocarditis, though vegetations are frequently absent 1

Imaging technique:

  • Parasternal short-axis view best determines origin (central vs. paravalvular) 1
  • Posterior jets may be masked by prosthetic shadowing in parasternal views—carefully examine apical views 1
  • 3D TEE provides en face view enabling accurate determination of number and location of dehiscence areas 1

Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch (PPM)

Diagnostic criteria:

  • Suspect PPM when persistent symptoms occur after valve replacement with high prosthetic velocity/gradient (mean >20 mmHg) and small indexed EOA (≤0.85 cm²/m²) 2
  • Severe PPM defined as iEOA <0.65 cm²/m²; moderate PPM as iEOA 0.65-0.85 cm²/m² 2

Assessment algorithm:

  1. Calculate EOA using continuity equation from TTE 2
  2. Index EOA to body surface area 2
  3. Compare to normal reference values for specific prosthesis model 2
  4. If TTE inadequate or discordant, proceed to TEE 2
  5. Assess left ventricular hypertrophy regression and function 2

Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis

High-risk indicators requiring urgent evaluation:

  • Persistent fever without bacteremia or new murmur in prosthetic valve patient 1
  • TEE has lower sensitivity for prosthetic endocarditis compared to native valve endocarditis—serial studies are paramount 1
  • CT is reasonable to evaluate paravalvular abscess extent and anatomic consequences when TEE is equivocal 1
  • New paraprosthetic regurgitation with valve instability, even without visible vegetations, suggests endocarditis 1

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

Technical Pitfalls

  • Bileaflet mechanical valves show high velocities due to complex flow patterns and pressure recovery—do not mistake for stenosis or PPM 2
  • Failure to use prosthesis-specific reference values when calculating EOA leads to misdiagnosis 2
  • Inadequate LVOT measurements compromise EOA calculation accuracy—use multiple views and careful technique 2
  • Anterior regurgitant jets may be under-detected on TEE due to shadowing—obtain multiple views 1

Clinical Pitfalls

  • Normalization of septal motion in presence of dynamic LV with pulmonary edema/shock suggests left-sided prosthetic dysfunction 1
  • Modest regurgitant volume developing acutely can cause severe symptoms despite appearing hemodynamically mild 1
  • In low cardiac output states, severely stenotic valves may show only mildly elevated gradients—use acceleration time and AT/ET ratio 1
  • Positive pressure ventilation significantly alters hemodynamics and echocardiographic findings 1

Diagnostic Algorithm Pitfalls

  • Never rely on single imaging modality—use parallel diagnostic techniques when uncertainty exists 1
  • Always compare to previous post-operative baseline studies when available 1
  • In critically ill patients requiring extracorporeal support, even minor aortic regurgitation may be important and requires expert evaluation 1

Recommendations for Specific Clinical Scenarios

Acute Presentation with Hemodynamic Instability

  • Urgent TTE is mandatory to define extent and mechanism of dysfunction 1
  • Suspect massive prosthetic obstruction or regurgitation, plus prosthetic endocarditis if septic 1
  • Look for normalization of septal motion with dynamic LV and pulmonary edema features 1
  • TOE required except when TTE entirely conclusive 1

Routine Surveillance

  • Establish baseline "fingerprint" study early after hospital discharge 1
  • Comprehensive study indicated for new murmur or symptoms possibly related to prosthesis 1
  • Document all hemodynamic parameters for longitudinal comparison 1

Pre-Intervention Planning

  • Review all available imaging from different modalities as each provides valuable information on different dysfunction aspects 1
  • Serial imaging allows early detection of valve degeneration 1
  • Consider invasive hemodynamic assessment with high-fidelity pressure wire if non-invasive assessment remains inconclusive 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Assessment and Management of Prosthetic Valve Mismatch

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Retrograde left-ventricular hemodynamic assessment of mechanical aortic and mitral valve gradients using a high-fidelity pressure wire: a case series.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2010

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.