Assessment of Mechanical Aortic Valve Prosthesis
In patients with mechanical aortic valve replacement, urgent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is mandatory as the first-line assessment, followed by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in all cases except when TTE is entirely conclusive, with particular attention to prosthetic valve dysfunction including obstruction, regurgitation, and patient-prosthesis mismatch. 1
Initial Assessment Framework
Essential Pre-Imaging Information
Before performing echocardiography, document the following critical information:
- Prosthesis specifications: Type (mechanical valve model), size, and date of implantation 1
- Clinical presentation: Symptoms (heart failure, syncope, thromboembolism), presence of new murmur, fever, or signs of endocarditis 1
- Hemodynamic parameters: Current blood pressure and heart rate at time of examination 1
- Patient metrics: Height, weight, and body surface area for indexed calculations 1
- Review operative report: Confirms prosthesis brand, model, device number, and implantation technique 1
Multimodality Imaging Algorithm
Step 1: Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE)
2D imaging assessment should evaluate:
Doppler hemodynamic assessment must include:
- Peak velocity and mean transvalvular gradient (normal mechanical aortic valve shows peak velocity >2 m/s with mean gradient typically <10 mmHg) 1, 2
- Spectral Doppler envelope characteristics (normal shows triangular envelope with short acceleration time <80 ms) 1
- Effective orifice area (EOA) calculation using continuity equation 1, 2
- Doppler velocity index (DVI) calculation 1
Step 2: Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE)
- TEE is required except when TTE is entirely conclusive 1
- Prosthetic valves must be evaluated by an expert in both TTE and TEE in emergency settings 1
- 3D TEE is now the preferred modality as it provides en face viewing of the entire prosthesis and sewing ring 1
- Mid-esophageal views at 45° and 120° provide optimal short- and long-axis visualization of valve closure, opening, and regurgitation 1
Step 3: Cardiac CT When Indicated
- CT should be considered when echocardiography cannot clearly delineate anatomy in suspected paravalvular infections 1
- CT is particularly useful for mechanical valves as it is less affected by shadowing artifacts than ultrasound 1
- CT allows evaluation of occluder motion and visualization of thrombus or pannus limiting valve function 1
- Fluoroscopy should be undertaken when doubt remains regarding mechanical prosthesis function 1
Specific Dysfunction Patterns to Assess
Prosthetic Valve Obstruction
Key diagnostic features:
- Increased mean transvalvular gradients with prolonged acceleration time (AT >100 ms) and AT/ejection time ratio >0.37 suggest obstruction 1
- Direct observation of restricted occluder motion on 2D imaging 1
- Obstruction typically due to thrombosis (most common in mechanical valves) or pannus formation 1
- Fluoroscopy and/or CT should be considered if obstruction is suspected to identify thrombus or pannus 1
Critical distinction: High gradients alone do not confirm obstruction—must distinguish from patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) by comparing measured EOA to normal reference values for that specific prosthesis model 2
Prosthetic Valve Regurgitation
Assessment approach:
- Paraprosthetic regurgitation is more common than transvalvular regurgitation in mechanical valves 1
- Abnormal mobility/rocking of the prosthesis sewing ring nearly always implies severe paraprosthetic regurgitation 1
Severity grading for paraprosthetic leaks:
- Measure extent of prosthetic circumference showing leakage on short-axis views 1
- >20% of circumference indicates severe regurgitation 1
- Premature mitral valve closure indicates catastrophic aortic prosthetic regurgitation 1
- New paraprosthetic leakage in acute setting is predominantly due to endocarditis, though vegetations are frequently absent 1
Imaging technique:
- Parasternal short-axis view best determines origin (central vs. paravalvular) 1
- Posterior jets may be masked by prosthetic shadowing in parasternal views—carefully examine apical views 1
- 3D TEE provides en face view enabling accurate determination of number and location of dehiscence areas 1
Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch (PPM)
Diagnostic criteria:
- Suspect PPM when persistent symptoms occur after valve replacement with high prosthetic velocity/gradient (mean >20 mmHg) and small indexed EOA (≤0.85 cm²/m²) 2
- Severe PPM defined as iEOA <0.65 cm²/m²; moderate PPM as iEOA 0.65-0.85 cm²/m² 2
Assessment algorithm:
- Calculate EOA using continuity equation from TTE 2
- Index EOA to body surface area 2
- Compare to normal reference values for specific prosthesis model 2
- If TTE inadequate or discordant, proceed to TEE 2
- Assess left ventricular hypertrophy regression and function 2
Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis
High-risk indicators requiring urgent evaluation:
- Persistent fever without bacteremia or new murmur in prosthetic valve patient 1
- TEE has lower sensitivity for prosthetic endocarditis compared to native valve endocarditis—serial studies are paramount 1
- CT is reasonable to evaluate paravalvular abscess extent and anatomic consequences when TEE is equivocal 1
- New paraprosthetic regurgitation with valve instability, even without visible vegetations, suggests endocarditis 1
Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them
Technical Pitfalls
- Bileaflet mechanical valves show high velocities due to complex flow patterns and pressure recovery—do not mistake for stenosis or PPM 2
- Failure to use prosthesis-specific reference values when calculating EOA leads to misdiagnosis 2
- Inadequate LVOT measurements compromise EOA calculation accuracy—use multiple views and careful technique 2
- Anterior regurgitant jets may be under-detected on TEE due to shadowing—obtain multiple views 1
Clinical Pitfalls
- Normalization of septal motion in presence of dynamic LV with pulmonary edema/shock suggests left-sided prosthetic dysfunction 1
- Modest regurgitant volume developing acutely can cause severe symptoms despite appearing hemodynamically mild 1
- In low cardiac output states, severely stenotic valves may show only mildly elevated gradients—use acceleration time and AT/ET ratio 1
- Positive pressure ventilation significantly alters hemodynamics and echocardiographic findings 1
Diagnostic Algorithm Pitfalls
- Never rely on single imaging modality—use parallel diagnostic techniques when uncertainty exists 1
- Always compare to previous post-operative baseline studies when available 1
- In critically ill patients requiring extracorporeal support, even minor aortic regurgitation may be important and requires expert evaluation 1
Recommendations for Specific Clinical Scenarios
Acute Presentation with Hemodynamic Instability
- Urgent TTE is mandatory to define extent and mechanism of dysfunction 1
- Suspect massive prosthetic obstruction or regurgitation, plus prosthetic endocarditis if septic 1
- Look for normalization of septal motion with dynamic LV and pulmonary edema features 1
- TOE required except when TTE entirely conclusive 1
Routine Surveillance
- Establish baseline "fingerprint" study early after hospital discharge 1
- Comprehensive study indicated for new murmur or symptoms possibly related to prosthesis 1
- Document all hemodynamic parameters for longitudinal comparison 1
Pre-Intervention Planning
- Review all available imaging from different modalities as each provides valuable information on different dysfunction aspects 1
- Serial imaging allows early detection of valve degeneration 1
- Consider invasive hemodynamic assessment with high-fidelity pressure wire if non-invasive assessment remains inconclusive 3