Can left-sided trigeminal nerve involvement occur with Internal Carotid Artery (ICA) junction aneurysm?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 13, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Trigeminal Nerve Involvement with ICA Junction Aneurysms

Yes, left-sided trigeminal nerve involvement can occur with Internal Carotid Artery (ICA) junction aneurysms, particularly when the aneurysm is large and projects posteriorly or medially to compress the trigeminal nerve in the cavernous sinus or at its root entry zone.

Anatomical Basis for Trigeminal Involvement

The trigeminal nerve (CN V) provides general sensation to the face and divides into three main branches: ophthalmic (V1), maxillary (V2), and mandibular (V3) divisions 1. The meningeal branch of the mandibular nerve re-enters the cranium through the foramen spinosum to provide sensory innervation to the dura mater of the middle cranial fossa 1.

ICA aneurysms can compress the trigeminal nerve through two primary mechanisms:

  • Cavernous sinus compression: When aneurysms extend into or compress the cavernous sinus, where the trigeminal nerve and its branches traverse 2
  • Direct trigeminal root compression: Large aneurysms projecting posteriorly or medially can directly compress the trigeminal root at the pons 2

Clinical Presentation Patterns

Aneurysms at the ICA junction causing trigeminal symptoms typically present with specific characteristics:

  • Mean aneurysm size of 24.7mm (range 7-40mm), with 87.5% projecting posteriorly 2
  • Atypical trigeminal neuralgia (continuous pain with exacerbating fits) in 87.5% of cases, rather than classic TGN 2
  • Absence of trigger points in 87.5% of cases 2
  • Most common pain distribution: V2 alone, followed by V1-2, then V1-2-3 2

Associated Cranial Nerve Findings

Abducens nerve palsy (CN VI) frequently accompanies trigeminal involvement with ICA-persistent primitive trigeminal artery (PPTA) junction aneurysms, as documented in multiple case reports 3, 4. This occurs because both nerves traverse the cavernous sinus in close proximity to the ICA.

Critical Diagnostic Considerations

When evaluating for ICA junction aneurysms with trigeminal symptoms, look for:

  • Large aneurysm size (typically >20mm) with posterior-medial-inferior projection 2
  • Cavernous sinus extension or compression on imaging 2
  • Continuous facial pain rather than paroxysmal attacks 2
  • Absence of typical TGN trigger points 2
  • Associated oculomotor or abducens nerve dysfunction 3, 4

Imaging Approach

For suspected ICA junction aneurysms causing cranial nerve symptoms:

  • CTA with 3-dimensional reconstruction, MRA, or DSA are all reasonable initial screening modalities 5
  • If initial imaging is negative but clinical suspicion remains high, conventional angiography may be reasonable 5
  • DSA offers diagnostic advantage for small aneurysms (<3mm) but carries <1% complication risk 5

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not dismiss atypical facial pain patterns in patients with large ICA aneurysms, as trigeminal involvement presents differently than classic TGN (continuous pain, no triggers, multiple divisions involved) 2.

Consider persistent primitive trigeminal artery (PPTA) variants, as aneurysms at the ICA-PPTA junction have particular propensity for causing both trigeminal and abducens nerve symptoms 3, 4, 6, 7.

Recognize that standard ICA occlusion may be inadequate for PPTA-associated aneurysms, as continued blood supply via the PPTA from the vertebrobasilar system can maintain aneurysm filling 6, 7.

Treatment Implications

Surgical aneurysmal clipping has been the most frequent treatment for ICA junction aneurysms causing trigeminal symptoms, providing complete trigeminal pain relief in all reported cases with good neurological outcomes (average mRS score of 1) 2. Flow-diverter stents represent an emerging alternative, particularly after PPTA embolization when applicable 4.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.