Ceftazidime-Avibactam: Antimicrobial Spectrum and Clinical Applications
Ceftazidime-avibactam is active against Ambler class A carbapenemases (including KPC-2 and KPC-3) and certain class D carbapenemases (OXA-48), but is NOT active against metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) producers such as NDM, VIM, and IMP. 1
Spectrum of Activity
Organisms Covered by Ceftazidime-Avibactam
Enterobacteriaceae:
- Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales 2, 3
- KPC-producing organisms (KPC-2 and KPC-3) 2, 3
- OXA-48-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) 2
- Specific organisms: Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Enterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella oxytoca, Citrobacter freundii complex, Serratia marcescens 4
Pseudomonas aeruginosa:
Other:
- Haemophilus influenzae 4
Critical Gaps in Coverage
Ceftazidime-avibactam has NO activity against:
- Metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) producers (NDM, VIM, IMP) 1, 2, 3
- Acinetobacter species (intrinsic resistance due to OXA-type carbapenemases not inhibited by avibactam) 3, 6
- Anaerobic bacteria 3, 6
- Gram-positive organisms including MRSA 3
FDA-Approved Indications and Dosing
Adult Patients (≥18 years, CrCl >50 mL/min)
Standard dose: 2.5 grams (ceftazidime 2g + avibactam 0.5g) IV every 8 hours over 2 hours 4
Approved indications:
- Complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI): MUST be combined with metronidazole 0.5g IV every 8 hours; duration 5-14 days 4
- Complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) including pyelonephritis: Duration 7-14 days 4
- Hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP): Duration 7-14 days 4
Pediatric Patients (≥31 weeks gestational age)
For patients 2 years to <18 years with eGFR >50 mL/min/1.73 m²:
- 62.5 mg/kg (max 2.5g) IV every 8 hours over 2 hours 4
- For cIAI, combine with metronidazole 10 mg/kg IV every 8 hours 4
Clinical Efficacy Evidence
Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE)
For KPC and OXA-48 producers:
- Ceftazidime-avibactam demonstrated 64% probability of better outcomes versus colistin (95% CI 57%-71%) 1
- Low-certainty evidence shows advantage over polymyxins for CRE susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam 1
- Associated with 182 fewer deaths per 1000 patients (RR 0.55,95% CI 0.42-0.72) and 307 fewer treatment failures per 1000 patients (RR 0.49,95% CI 0.34-0.70) 2
For MBL producers (NDM, VIM):
- Combination with aztreonam is required 1, 2
- Ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam showed significantly lower 30-day mortality (19.2% vs 44%) compared to other treatment options in MBL-producing CRE bacteremia 1, 2
- This combination demonstrated independent association with lower mortality (HR 0.37,95% CI 0.13-0.74) 1
Hospital-Acquired/Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
- Low-certainty evidence of non-inferiority to carbapenems for HAP/VAP caused by third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales 1, 2
- In subgroup analysis of 75 patients, ceftazidime-avibactam showed comparable outcomes to meropenem 1
Intra-Abdominal Infections
- Compared to meropenem in 106 patients with third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales: similar clinical and microbiological outcomes 1
- Phase II data: 91.2% clinical success with ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole versus 93.4% with meropenem 7
Critical Clinical Considerations
When to Use Ceftazidime-Avibactam
Empirical use is appropriate when:
- Prior IV antibiotic use within 90 days 3
- ICU with >10-20% carbapenem-resistant gram-negative isolates 3
- Septic shock at pneumonia presentation 3
- ARDS preceding pneumonia 3
- ≥5 days hospitalization prior to infection onset 3
- Acute renal replacement therapy prior to infection 3
When NOT to Use Ceftazidime-Avibactam
Aspiration pneumonia:
- NOT appropriate as monotherapy due to lack of anaerobic coverage 3, 6
- If used in healthcare-associated aspiration pneumonia, MUST add metronidazole 3, 6
- Better alternatives: ampicillin-sulbactam, amoxicillin-clavulanate, or piperacillin-tazobactam for community-acquired aspiration 6
MBL-producing organisms:
MRSA or gram-positive coverage needed:
- Must add vancomycin or linezolid 3
Resistance Development
Resistance can emerge during treatment:
- Occurs in 3.7-8.1% of treated patients 1, 2
- Mechanisms include amino acid insertion, substitution, or deletion in KPC protein U loop 1
- Novel VEB-25 β-lactamase described in Greece causing resistance independent of prior exposure 1
- Renal replacement therapy is independent predictor of resistance development (p=0.009) 3
- Combination therapy does NOT prevent resistance development 1
Optimal Administration
- Prolonged infusion (3 hours) associated with improved 30-day survival 1
- Appropriate renal dose adjustment critical for outcomes 1
- Renal adjustment required for CrCl <50 mL/min 4
Comparative Efficacy
Versus meropenem-vaborbactam:
- Meropenem-vaborbactam showed superior cure rates (65.6% vs 33.3%, p=0.03) and lower 28-day mortality (15.6% vs 33.3%) compared to best available therapy in small RCT 1
- Meropenem-vaborbactam has moderate-certainty evidence for advantage over older antibiotics for susceptible CRE 1
Versus ceftolozane-tazobactam:
- High-certainty evidence for non-inferiority of ceftolozane-tazobactam versus meropenem in HAP/VAP caused by third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales 1
Key Pitfalls to Avoid
- Never use as monotherapy for intra-abdominal infections - always combine with metronidazole for anaerobic coverage 4
- Do not use for aspiration pneumonia without metronidazole 3, 6
- Obtain carbapenemase typing before use when possible - ineffective against MBL producers 2, 3
- Do not assume combination therapy prevents resistance - resistance develops at similar rates with monotherapy versus combination 1
- Adjust for renal function - critical for efficacy and safety 1, 4