What are the echocardiographic criteria for diagnosing aortic stenosis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 13, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Echocardiographic Criteria for Aortic Stenosis

Severe aortic stenosis is diagnosed when peak jet velocity is ≥4 m/s, mean gradient is ≥40 mmHg, or aortic valve area (AVA) is <1.0 cm², though these three parameters must be interpreted together as they can be inconsistent, particularly in low-flow states. 1

Primary Hemodynamic Parameters

The three essential measurements for AS severity assessment are: 1, 2

Peak Jet Velocity

  • ≥4.0 m/s indicates severe AS 1, 2
  • 3.0-4.0 m/s indicates moderate AS 2
  • 2.6-2.9 m/s indicates mild AS 2
  • Must be obtained from multiple acoustic windows using a dedicated small dual-crystal continuous-wave Doppler transducer 1
  • Beam misalignment is a major source of error—interrogate from apical, right parasternal, suprasternal, and subcostal windows 1

Mean Transvalvular Pressure Gradient

  • ≥40 mmHg indicates severe AS 1, 2
  • 20-40 mmHg indicates moderate AS 2
  • <20 mmHg indicates mild AS 2
  • Must be calculated by averaging instantaneous gradients over the ejection period, not from mean velocity 1

Aortic Valve Area (AVA)

  • <1.0 cm² indicates severe AS 1, 2
  • 1.0-1.5 cm² indicates moderate AS 2
  • 1.5 cm² indicates mild AS 2

  • Calculated using the continuity equation: AVA = (CSA_LVOT × VTI_LVOT) / VTI_AV 1

Critical Technical Considerations for AVA Calculation

LVOT Diameter Measurement

  • Measure in parasternal long-axis view in mid-systole 1
  • Measure from inner edge to inner edge of septal endocardium and anterior mitral leaflet 1
  • Major limitation: Assumes circular LVOT shape, but it's actually elliptical, leading to underestimation of flow and AVA 1
  • Consider 3D TEE or MSCT for direct LVOT planimetry when measurements are discordant 1

LVOT Velocity Measurement

  • Record with pulsed Doppler from apical approach (five-chamber or apical long-axis view) 1
  • Position sample volume just proximal to aortic valve (0.5-1.0 cm below if flow acceleration occurs at annulus) 1
  • Obtain smooth velocity curve without spectral dispersion 1

Integrated Stepwise Approach to Severity Grading

Step 1: Assess Valve Morphology

  • Identify thickening, calcification, reduced cusp motion (calcific AS), doming (congenital AS), or fused commissures (rheumatic AS) 1

Step 2: Determine Gradient Category

  • High gradient (velocity ≥4 m/s or mean gradient ≥40 mmHg): Generally confirms severe AS without further testing needed 1
  • Low gradient (mean gradient <40 mmHg): Requires additional evaluation with AVA and flow assessment 1

Step 3: For Low Gradient AS—Assess Flow Status

Calculate stroke volume index (SVi): 1

  • Normal flow: SVi ≥35 mL/m²
  • Low flow: SVi <35 mL/m²

Step 4: Classify Based on Flow and EF

Low Flow, Low Gradient with Reduced EF (<50%): 1

  • Perform low-dose dobutamine stress echo (DSE) to distinguish true severe from pseudosevere AS 1, 2
  • Increase in AVA to >1.0 cm² suggests pseudosevere AS 1
  • Severe AS confirmed if velocity ≥4 m/s or mean gradient >30-40 mmHg with AVA remaining <1.0 cm² at any flow rate 1
  • Absence of contractile reserve (failure to increase SV by >20%) predicts high surgical mortality but valve replacement may still benefit 1

Low Flow, Low Gradient with Preserved EF (≥50%)—"Paradoxical" Low Flow AS: 1

  • Most challenging diagnosis—requires careful exclusion of measurement errors 1
  • Confirm with: 1
    • Mean gradient 30-40 mmHg (when normotensive)
    • AVA ≤0.8 cm²
    • Low flow confirmed by alternative techniques (3D TEE, MSCT, CMR)
    • Calcium score by MSCT is critical:
      • Severe AS likely: men ≥2000, women ≥1200 Agatston units
      • Severe AS very likely: men ≥3000, women ≥1600
      • Severe AS unlikely: men <1600, women <800

Important Pitfalls and Caveats

Inconsistency of Criteria

  • Critical caveat: The three primary parameters are often inconsistent 3, 4
  • AVA of 1.0 cm² actually corresponds to mean gradient of only 21-32 mmHg and velocity of 3.3-3.7 m/s in real-world cohorts 3, 4
  • Conversely, mean gradient of 40 mmHg corresponds to AVA of 0.75-0.89 cm², and velocity of 4.0 m/s corresponds to AVA of 0.82-0.92 cm² 3, 4
  • Discrepancy rate is 40% in low-flow states versus 16% in normal flow 4

High Flow States (SVi >58 mL/m²)

  • May produce high gradients even with AVA >1.0 cm² 1
  • Identify reversible causes: anemia, hyperthyroidism, arteriovenous shunts, significant aortic regurgitation 1
  • Reassess after treating reversible conditions 1

Serial Measurements

  • Always record from the same acoustic window where highest velocities obtained 1
  • LVOT diameter rarely changes in adults—consider using same measurement to reduce variability 1

Additional Severity Parameters

Beyond the primary three parameters: 2

  • Indexed AVA: <0.6 cm²/m² indicates severe AS
  • Velocity ratio (LVOT velocity/AV velocity): <0.25 indicates severe AS

Follow-up Intervals

Based on severity: 2, 5

  • Severe AS (asymptomatic): Every year
  • Moderate AS: Every 1-2 years
  • Mild AS: Every 3-5 years
  • Aortic sclerosis: Every 3-5 years

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Stenosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Progression of aortic stenosis and echocardiographic criteria for its severity.

European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging, 2020

Guideline

Aortic Sclerosis Monitoring and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.