Initial Assessment of Acute Scaphoid Wrist Fracture
Begin with standard 3-view wrist radiographs (posteroanterior, lateral, and 45° semipronated oblique "scaphoid view"), and if negative but clinical suspicion remains high, proceed directly to MRI or CT without contrast rather than empiric casting. 1, 2
Clinical Assessment
Key Physical Examination Findings
- Anatomical snuffbox tenderness - though this alone is insufficient for diagnosis, as 80% of patients with isolated snuffbox tenderness have no fracture 3
- Scaphoid tubercle tenderness on palpation 4
- Pain with axial compression of the thumb 4
- Assess for other wrist injuries - 13% of patients with suspected scaphoid injury have other wrist pathology unrelated to the scaphoid 3
Mechanism of Injury
- Typically results from forceful wrist extension during a fall on an outstretched hand 5
Radiographic Evaluation
Initial Imaging
- Standard 3-view radiographic series is mandatory as the first-line examination 1, 2
- Look specifically for:
When Initial Radiographs Are Negative
If clinical suspicion remains high despite negative radiographs, do NOT routinely immobilize and wait 2 weeks for repeat films. 3, 4
Advanced Imaging Options (in order of preference):
MRI without IV contrast is the preferred next study:
- Highly sensitive for occult fractures through detection of bone marrow edema 1
- Detects concomitant soft tissue injuries including scapholunate ligament tears that may affect treatment 1
- Can be used as an alternative to presumptive casting and repeat radiographs 1
- IV contrast adds no value in acute fracture assessment 1
CT without IV contrast is an acceptable alternative:
- Superior for visualizing bone cortex and trabeculae 1
- Shorter acquisition times than MRI and easier to perform in casted patients 1
- Preferred for specific fractures like hook of hamate 1
- Less sensitive than MRI for bone bruises and soft-tissue injuries 1
Bone scintigraphy (if MRI/CT unavailable):
- High sensitivity - normal bone scan reliably excludes occult scaphoid fracture 1
- Lower specificity than CT/MRI due to uptake from bone contusions, osteoarthritis 1
- Reasonable alternative in claustrophobic patients 1
- Cost-effective when performed early rather than after weeks of immobilization 3
Fracture Classification
Assess Stability
Classify as either stable/undisplaced or unstable/displaced 5:
Unstable/Displaced fractures have:
Stable/Undisplaced fractures (B1 or B2 patterns):
Assessment for Complications
Evaluate for Associated Injuries
- Ligamentous injuries - particularly scapholunate and lunotriquetral ligaments 1
- Distal radius fractures - look for intra-articular extension and "longhorn sign" 2
- Other carpal bone injuries 3
Risk Factors for Non-Union
- Proximal pole fractures - assess blood supply concerns 1
- Displaced fractures - higher risk of avascular necrosis 1
- Delayed diagnosis - contributes to non-union risk 3
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not rely solely on snuffbox tenderness - this has poor specificity and leads to unnecessary immobilization in 80% of cases 3
- Do not routinely immobilize all suspected fractures for 2 weeks without advanced imaging - this results in needless treatment and healthcare costs 3
- Do not obtain inadequate radiographic views - minimum 3 views required to avoid missed diagnosis 2
- Do not assume radiographs are sufficient - 2-5% of scaphoid fractures are missed on initial presentation 3
- Do not forget to assess for carpal instability on initial radiographs, as this changes management from stable to unstable classification 1