Differentiating Müllerian Agenesis from Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome
The key differentiating factor is karyotype: Müllerian agenesis patients have 46,XX karyotype with normal female testosterone levels, while Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome (CAIS) patients have 46,XY karyotype with male-range testosterone levels. 1
Clinical Presentation Similarities
Both conditions present with:
- Primary amenorrhea in otherwise normally developed females 2, 3
- Normal female external genitalia 2, 4
- Absence of uterus and upper vagina 3, 4
- Normal breast development at puberty 2, 3
Critical Distinguishing Features
Karyotype Analysis
- Müllerian agenesis: 46,XX (genetic female) 3, 5
- CAIS: 46,XY (genetic male with female phenotype) 1, 4
Testosterone Levels
- Müllerian agenesis: Normal female range testosterone 5
- CAIS: Male-range or higher testosterone levels due to functioning testes 1, 4
Gonadal Tissue
- Müllerian agenesis: Normal ovaries present (may be identified on imaging) 3, 5
- CAIS: Testes present (may be intra-abdominal, inguinal, or labial) 2, 4
Physical Examination Clues
- Müllerian agenesis: Normal pubic and axillary hair distribution 3
- CAIS: Sparse or absent pubic and axillary hair due to androgen receptor defects 2, 1
Inguinal Masses/Hernias
- Müllerian agenesis: Not characteristic 3
- CAIS: Bilateral inguinal masses or hernias are highly suggestive, especially with family history of similar presentations 1
Diagnostic Algorithm
Step 1: Initial Hormonal Assessment
- Measure serum testosterone, LH, FSH 1
- Male-range testosterone strongly suggests CAIS 1
- Normal female testosterone suggests Müllerian agenesis 5
Step 2: Karyotype Analysis
Step 3: Imaging Evaluation
- MRI is superior to ultrasound for identifying Müllerian structures and gonadal location 1, 4
- Look for presence/absence of ovaries versus testes 4
- Identify location of gonads if testes present (intra-abdominal, inguinal, labial) 4
Step 4: Physical Examination Details
- Assess pubic/axillary hair distribution 1
- Palpate for inguinal masses 1
- Evaluate for associated anomalies (renal, skeletal in Müllerian agenesis) 3, 5
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Do not rely on imaging alone: Two-dimensional ultrasound is unreliable for diagnosing Müllerian agenesis and cannot differentiate it from CAIS 5. MRI showing absent Müllerian structures can occur in both conditions 1.
Do not skip karyotyping: The case report by 1 demonstrates how MRI findings of absent Müllerian structures led to initial misdiagnosis as Müllerian agenesis when the patient actually had CAIS—only karyotyping revealed the correct diagnosis.
Family history matters: A family history of female relatives with infertility and bilateral inguinal hernias should raise suspicion for CAIS 1.
Management Implications
For CAIS
- Gonadectomy is required due to malignancy risk in undescended testes 1, 4
- Timing of gonadectomy (prepubertal vs. postpubertal) should consider age-related malignancy risk 1
- Lifelong hormone replacement therapy after gonadectomy 1
For Müllerian Agenesis
- Nonsurgical vaginal dilation is first-line treatment (90-96% success rate) 3
- Evaluation for associated renal and skeletal anomalies 3, 5
- No gonadectomy needed; ovaries function normally 3
Both conditions require comprehensive psychological counseling and discussion of fertility options including adoption and gestational surrogacy 3, 6.