What are the echo findings and management of pulmonary embolism (pulmo embo)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 13, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Echocardiographic Findings in Pulmonary Embolism

In suspected high-risk PE with hemodynamic instability, bedside transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) should be performed immediately to identify right ventricular (RV) overload and dysfunction, which can justify emergency reperfusion treatment when CT is unavailable or the patient is too unstable for transport. 1, 2

Primary Echocardiographic Findings

Classic Signs of RV Pressure Overload

The typical echocardiographic picture of hemodynamically significant PE includes the following findings 1:

  • RV dilation and hypokinesis - The right ventricle becomes dilated with reduced contractility due to acute pressure overload 1
  • Increased RV/LV diameter ratio >0.5 (or ≥1.0 for high-risk stratification) - Caused by interventricular septal bulging into the left ventricle 1, 2
  • Dilated proximal pulmonary arteries - Reflects acute pulmonary hypertension 1
  • Tricuspid regurgitation with increased jet velocity - Typically in the range of 3-3.5 m/s, though paradoxically may show only mild-moderate elevation (trans-tricuspid gradient <60 mmHg) despite severe PE 1
  • Abnormal interventricular septal motion - The septum flattens or bows toward the left ventricle, creating a "D-shaped" left ventricle 1, 3
  • Dilated inferior vena cava - Usually dilated and does not collapse on inspiration, reflecting elevated right atrial pressure 1

Specific Diagnostic Signs

McConnell's sign is a highly specific finding for acute PE: RV free wall hypokinesis with sparing of the apical segment, tested prospectively with 77% sensitivity and 94% specificity 1, 3. This regional wall motion abnormality distinguishes acute PE from other causes of RV dysfunction 1.

The 60/60 sign demonstrates severely disturbed RV ejection pattern (acceleration time <60 ms) with only moderate pulmonary hypertension (trans-tricuspid gradient <60 mmHg), which is 98% specific but only 48% sensitive for acute PE 1, 3.

Quantitative Parameters

  • Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) <16 mm - Indicates RV systolic dysfunction and has prognostic value 2, 3
  • Decreased S' velocity on tissue Doppler - Reflects impaired RV longitudinal function 3
  • Pulmonary artery mid-systolic notching - Suggests elevated pulmonary vascular resistance 3

Direct Visualization of Thrombi

Right heart thrombi can be visualized in 4-18% of PE patients (higher in ICU settings), appearing as mobile masses in the right atrium, right ventricle, or inferior vena cava en route to pulmonary arteries 2, 4. These are associated with RV dysfunction and high early mortality 2.

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) may directly visualize thrombi in the main pulmonary arteries when transthoracic windows are inadequate 1, 5.

Clinical Application by Risk Category

High-Risk PE (Shock or Hypotension)

The absence of echocardiographic signs of RV overload or dysfunction virtually excludes massive PE as the cause of hemodynamic instability 1, 2. In highly unstable patients, unequivocal echocardiographic evidence of RV dysfunction is sufficient to prompt immediate reperfusion treatment without further testing 1, 2.

TTE serves critical roles in this setting 1, 2:

  • Provides immediate diagnostic information when CT is unavailable
  • Differentiates PE from other causes of shock (pericardial tamponade, acute valvular dysfunction, severe LV dysfunction, aortic dissection)
  • Guides decision for thrombolysis or embolectomy

Non-High-Risk PE (Hemodynamically Stable)

TTE is NOT recommended as part of routine diagnostic workup in hemodynamically stable patients with suspected PE due to limited sensitivity 1, 2. A combination of RV/LV diameter ratio >0.5 and tricuspid regurgitant velocity >2.5 m/s showed only 81% specificity for PE diagnosis 1.

However, TTE remains valuable for 1, 2:

  • Risk stratification - RV dysfunction identifies intermediate-risk patients who may benefit from intensive monitoring
  • Prognostic assessment - RV dysfunction in normotensive patients confers 2.29-fold increased short-term mortality 2
  • Differential diagnosis - When clinical and laboratory findings are ambiguous 2

Important Caveats and Pitfalls

Echocardiography cannot definitively confirm or exclude PE - It demonstrates the hemodynamic consequences rather than the thrombus itself 1. The sensitivity for PE diagnosis is only 50-60% with specificity of 80-90% 6.

Small or subsegmental PE may show normal echocardiography - When pressure overload is trivial, TTE findings may be entirely normal 5.

The degree of pulmonary hypertension may be paradoxically modest - The previously normal, non-hypertrophied RV cannot generate mean pulmonary arterial pressure exceeding approximately 40 mmHg acutely 7. This explains why tricuspid regurgitant velocities may suggest only mild-moderate elevation despite massive PE 1, 7.

Echocardiographic parameters are difficult to standardize - The positive predictive value for PE-related death is less than 10% in hemodynamically stable patients 2.

Serial echocardiography can monitor treatment response - Abnormalities resolve during recovery from PE, potentially more rapidly with thrombolytic therapy than heparin alone 7.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Transthoracic Echocardiogram Indications in Pulmonary Embolism

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Echocardiography in pulmonary embolism disease.

International journal of cardiology, 1998

Guideline

ECG Changes Associated with Pulmonary Embolism

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.