What is the normal range for endometrial thickness in women?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 13, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Normal Endometrial Thickness

In postmenopausal women, normal endometrial thickness is ≤4 mm, while in premenopausal women, endometrial thickness varies with the menstrual cycle and has no validated upper limit cutoff. 1

Postmenopausal Women

The critical threshold for postmenopausal women is 4 mm or less, which conveys a negative predictive value for endometrial cancer of nearly 100%. 1, 2

Key Thresholds and Actions:

  • ≤4 mm: Considered normal; no further evaluation needed if asymptomatic 1, 2
  • ≥5 mm: Prompts endometrial tissue sampling due to increased cancer risk 1, 2

Clinical Context:

  • The mean endometrial thickness in asymptomatic postmenopausal women is approximately 2.9 mm (95% CI, 2.6-3.3 mm) 3
  • Endometrial thickness correlates with body weight and body mass index in postmenopausal women 4
  • For asymptomatic postmenopausal women without bleeding, an 11 mm threshold has been proposed, as thickness >11 mm carries approximately 6.7% cancer risk 5

Important Caveats:

  • Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) is sensitive for measuring endometrial thickness but cannot reliably determine the etiology of thickening 1
  • Abnormal echogenicity and texture of the endometrium correlate with significant pathology even when thickness appears normal 1
  • The European Society for Medical Oncology uses a slightly more conservative cut-off of ≤3 mm 2

Premenopausal Women

In premenopausal women, endometrial thickness varies throughout the menstrual cycle, and there is no validated absolute upper limit cutoff. 1

Critical Clinical Points:

  • Endometrial thickness is NOT a reliable indicator of endometrial pathology in premenopausal women 1
  • Even with thickness <5 mm, endometrial polyps or other pathology may be present 1
  • The thickness changes physiologically with hormonal fluctuations during the menstrual cycle 1

Diagnostic Approach:

  • Focus on abnormal echogenicity and texture rather than absolute thickness measurements 1
  • Clinical symptoms (abnormal uterine bleeding) should drive further evaluation, not thickness alone 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid:

  • Do not apply postmenopausal thresholds to premenopausal women - the physiology is fundamentally different 1
  • Do not rely solely on endometrial thickness measurement - always consider echogenicity, texture, and clinical presentation 1
  • Do not use endometrial thickness as a screening tool in asymptomatic postmenopausal women - the prevalence of malignancy is too low (0.62%) to justify routine screening 3
  • In women taking selective progesterone receptor modulators (like ulipristal acetate), endometrial thickness may increase to >16 mm in 11% of patients without pathological significance 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Endometrial Thickness in Postmenopausal Women

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Capacity of endometrial thickness measurement to diagnose endometrial carcinoma in asymptomatic postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2012

Research

How thick is too thick? When endometrial thickness should prompt biopsy in postmenopausal women without vaginal bleeding.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.