What are the risks of radiation exposure from a Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) scan?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 13, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

DEXA Radiation Exposure

The radiation dose from a DEXA scan is negligible—less than one chest X-ray or a short airplane flight—and poses essentially no meaningful health risk to patients. 1

Quantified Radiation Exposure Levels

The actual radiation exposure from DEXA scanning is extremely low across all measurement sites:

  • Standard DEXA (spine and hip): Approximately 2.5 microsieverts (µSv) effective dose 2
  • Whole body DEXA with vertebral fracture assessment: A few microsieverts at most 3
  • Total effective dose for spine and dual femur examination: Comparable to a few microsieverts 3

For context, these doses are substantially lower than other common imaging modalities:

  • A single abdominal X-ray delivers approximately 100 µSv (40 times higher than DEXA) 2
  • Quantitative CT (QCT) for bone density delivers 300-1000 µSv (120-400 times higher than DEXA) 2

Relative Radiation Level Classification

The American College of Radiology assigns DEXA the lowest possible relative radiation level (RRL) designation, indicated by a single radiation symbol (☢), confirming its minimal exposure profile. 1 This classification places DEXA at the absolute bottom of the diagnostic radiology exposure spectrum. 2

Clinical Risk Assessment

The radiation risk from DEXA is so low that it should never be a factor in clinical decision-making about whether to perform the scan. 2 The effective dose is considered negligible even in vulnerable populations including:

  • Pediatric patients: Despite children being inherently more radiosensitive due to organ sensitivity and longer life expectancy, DEXA remains appropriate when clinically indicated 1
  • Cancer survivors: Even in childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors who have already received therapeutic radiation, the dose from one DEXA scan is considered negligible 1
  • Patients requiring serial monitoring: Repeat DEXA scans every 1-2 years for monitoring are appropriate without meaningful cumulative radiation concern 4, 5

Important Caveats

While radiation exposure from DEXA is minimal, clinicians should still adhere to basic radiation safety principles:

  • Clinical justification: Each examination must be clinically justified, as with any X-ray imaging technique 6
  • ALARA principle: Keep doses as low as reasonably achievable while ensuring diagnostic quality 1
  • Avoid unnecessary anxiety: Predictions of cancer deaths from low-dose medical imaging (including DEXA) are not supported by hard data and create harmful patient anxiety that may lead to refusal of needed procedures 1

The adverse health consequences of refusing a needed DEXA scan far outweigh any theoretical radiation-associated risks. 1

Comparison to Alternative Modalities

When bone density assessment is needed, DEXA should be strongly preferred over CT-based methods from a radiation perspective:

  • QCT delivers 120-400 times more radiation than DEXA 2
  • High-resolution MDCT for bone structure evaluation: 1-3 millisieverts (mSv), which is 400-1200 times higher than DEXA 6

The American College of Radiology rates standard DEXA of the lumbar spine and hips as the most appropriate modality (rating 9/9) for bone mineral density screening, with its minimal radiation exposure being one contributing factor. 1, 4

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Patient doses in bone mineral densitometry.

The British journal of radiology, 1996

Guideline

DEXA Scanning Recommendations for Endocrine Disorders and Osteoporosis Risk

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

DEXA Scan Screening in Klinefelter Syndrome

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.