Distinguishing Chronic Compensated DIC from TTP/HUS
Chronic compensated DIC and TTP/HUS can be reliably differentiated using readily available laboratory tests: a platelet count <20 × 10³/μL combined with a prothrombin time (PT) within 5 seconds of the upper limit of normal has 92% specificity for TTP/HUS, while chronic DIC typically shows elevated PT/INR with less severe thrombocytopenia and markedly elevated D-dimer. 1
Key Laboratory Distinctions
Coagulation Parameters
- PT/INR: Normal or minimally prolonged in TTP/HUS (within 5 seconds of upper limit), whereas chronic DIC shows elevated PT/INR due to consumption of clotting factors 1
- APTT: Generally normal in TTP/HUS, may be slightly elevated in chronic DIC 2, 1
- Fibrinogen: Normal in TTP/HUS; normal or slightly decreased in chronic compensated DIC (unlike acute DIC where it drops significantly) 2, 3
- D-dimer: Markedly elevated in chronic DIC (often >5 μg/mL), less dramatically elevated in TTP/HUS 2
Platelet Count Patterns
- TTP/HUS: Profound thrombocytopenia, typically <20 × 10³/μL, is highly characteristic 1
- Chronic compensated DIC: Moderate thrombocytopenia (often 50-150 × 10³/μL) as platelets can be replenished over time 4, 2
Hemolysis Markers
- Both conditions show microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA) with schistocytes, elevated LDH, decreased haptoglobin, and indirect hyperbilirubinemia 5, 6, 2
- Reticulocyte count: Elevated in both due to hemolysis, but normal reticulocyte count with thrombocytopenia suggests chronic DIC rather than TTP/HUS 2
Clinical Context Differences
Underlying Conditions
- Chronic compensated DIC: Associated with metastatic malignancy (especially prostate, pancreatic, gastric cancers), chronic liver disease, or ongoing low-grade tissue factor exposure 4, 2, 3
- TTP/HUS: ADAMTS13 deficiency (TTP), complement dysregulation (atypical HUS), or Shiga toxin exposure (typical HUS) 7
Clinical Presentation
- Chronic DIC: Stable laboratory abnormalities over time, thrombosis more common than bleeding (occurs in >10% of chronic cases vs <10% in acute DIC), may have underlying cancer symptoms 4, 3
- TTP/HUS: Acute presentation with neurological symptoms (TTP), renal failure (HUS), and severe thrombocytopenia; bleeding less prominent than thrombotic complications 6, 7
Diagnostic Algorithm
Step 1: Assess Platelet Count and PT
- If platelet count <20 × 10³/μL AND PT normal/near-normal → strongly suggests TTP/HUS 1
- If platelet count 50-150 × 10³/μL AND PT elevated → suggests chronic DIC 2, 1
Step 2: Evaluate D-dimer and Fibrinogen
- Markedly elevated D-dimer (>5 μg/mL) with normal fibrinogen → chronic DIC 2
- Moderately elevated D-dimer with normal fibrinogen → consider TTP/HUS 2
Step 3: Check for MAHA
- Peripheral smear showing schistocytes/helmet cells confirms microangiopathic process in both conditions 5, 2
Step 4: Assess ADAMTS13 Activity (if TTP/HUS suspected)
Step 5: Serial Monitoring
- Dynamic changes in coagulation parameters over hours to days suggest acute decompensation of DIC 8
- Stable abnormalities over weeks to months suggest chronic compensated DIC 8, 4
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
Misdiagnosis Risk
- Do not delay plasma exchange if TTP/HUS is suspected based on profound thrombocytopenia and normal PT, as TTP/HUS is 90% fatal without treatment 1, 7
- Do not assume DIC in all patients with thrombocytopenia and elevated D-dimer; check PT and degree of thrombocytopenia first 1
Treatment Implications
- TTP/HUS requires urgent plasma exchange as first-line therapy 7
- Chronic DIC requires therapeutic-dose anticoagulation (LMWH or heparin) to prevent thrombosis, not plasma exchange 2, 3
- Treating TTP/HUS with heparin alone (as for DIC) will result in death 7
- Treating chronic DIC with plasma exchange alone (as for TTP/HUS) will not address ongoing thrombin generation 3