What is the best birth control (contraceptive) patch?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 14, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Best Birth Control Patch

The transdermal contraceptive patch (Ortho Evra/Xulane) containing norelgestromin 0.6 mg and ethinyl estradiol 0.75 mg is currently the only FDA-approved contraceptive patch available in the United States, making it the default "best" option by virtue of being the sole marketed product. 1

Key Product Specifications

  • Dosing regimen: One patch applied weekly for 3 consecutive weeks, followed by 1 patch-free week 1
  • Application sites: Abdomen, upper torso, upper outer arm, or buttocks 1
  • Hormone delivery: Delivers norelgestromin 150 mcg and ethinyl estradiol 20 mcg daily to systemic circulation 2
  • Efficacy: Perfect use failure rate <1%; typical use failure rate 9% 1

Critical Safety Considerations

The patch carries a black box warning for increased venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk compared to combined oral contraceptives. 1

  • Estrogen exposure: 1.6 times higher than standard COCs 1
  • VTE risk: Odds ratios of 1.2 to 2.2 compared to 20-35 mcg COCs, though only one of five US studies showed statistically significant findings 1
  • Clinical context: Despite VTE concerns, unplanned pregnancy itself carries increased VTE risk, making the patch still a reasonable option for appropriate candidates 1

Advantages Over Oral Contraceptives

  • Improved compliance potential: Weekly dosing eliminates daily pill-taking 1, 2
  • Better adherence demonstrated: Patch users showed significantly better compliance than COC users in multiple trials (OR 2.05,95% CI 1.83-2.29; OR 2.76,95% CI 2.35-3.24) 3
  • Stable hormone levels: Transdermal delivery avoids gastrointestinal absorption variability, hepatic first-pass metabolism, and peaks/troughs seen with oral contraceptives 4, 5
  • Excellent adhesion: Less than 2% of patches required replacement due to complete detachment 2

Important Limitations

Patch users have higher discontinuation rates than COC users, which undermines the theoretical compliance advantage. 3

  • Early discontinuation: ORs ranging from 1.56 to 2.57 for stopping the patch versus COCs 3
  • Discontinuation due to adverse events: Patch users more likely to stop due to side effects 3
  • Real-world continuation: Only 57% of patch users continued at 1 year compared to 76% of pill users in one prospective study of 1,230 women 1

Side Effect Profile

Patch users experience more breast discomfort, dysmenorrhea, nausea, and vomiting compared to COC users. 3

  • Application site reactions: Can occur but are generally well-tolerated 2, 6
  • Cycle control: One trial showed patch users had less breakthrough bleeding and spotting than COC users 3

Clinical Decision Algorithm

Use the patch when:

  • Patient has difficulty with daily pill adherence but can manage weekly tasks 1
  • Patient has no increased VTE risk factors (obesity, smoking over age 35, thrombophilia, prolonged immobility) 1
  • Patient prefers non-oral, non-invasive contraception 2

Avoid the patch when:

  • Patient has VTE risk factors given the 1.6-fold higher estrogen exposure 1
  • Patient desires extended cycling (other methods may be safer first-line choices) 1
  • Patient weighs >90 kg (efficacy may be reduced, though not explicitly contraindicated) 1

Practical Management

For delayed application or detachment <48 hours: Apply new patch immediately, keep same patch change day, no backup contraception needed 1

For delayed application or detachment ≥48 hours: Apply new patch immediately, use backup contraception for 7 days, consider emergency contraception if occurred in first week with recent unprotected intercourse 1

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.