Ruling Out Testicular Strain
"Testicular strain" is not a recognized clinical diagnosis in scrotal pathology—you must instead systematically rule out the actual causes of acute scrotal pain, primarily testicular torsion, epididymitis, and torsion of testicular appendages, using duplex Doppler ultrasound as the definitive initial imaging modality. 1
Understanding the Clinical Context
The term "testicular strain" lacks medical specificity. When patients present with testicular pain, the critical imperative is to exclude surgical emergencies, particularly testicular torsion, which requires intervention within 6-8 hours to prevent testicular loss 1. The differential diagnosis includes:
- Testicular torsion (surgical emergency) 1
- Epididymitis/epididymo-orchitis (most common in adults >25 years) 1
- Torsion of testicular appendages (most common in prepubertal boys) 1
- Testicular trauma (if history supports) 1
Initial Clinical Assessment
Key Physical Examination Findings
Testicular torsion indicators:
- Absent cremasteric reflex (most reliable physical finding) 2, 3
- High-riding testicle with abnormal lie 2, 3
- Hard, swollen testicle 3
- Nausea and vomiting 4, 3
- Pain NOT relieved by testicular elevation (negative Prehn sign) 1
Epididymitis indicators:
- Gradual onset of pain (vs. abrupt in torsion) 1
- Pain relieved by elevating testicle over symphysis pubis (positive Prehn sign) 1
- Enlarged, tender epididymis 1
- May have abnormal urinalysis (though normal urinalysis does not exclude epididymitis) 1
Clinical Scoring System
The TWIST (Testicular Workup for Ischemia and Suspected Torsion) score can stratify risk 1, 3:
- Testicular swelling: 2 points 3
- Hard testicle: 2 points 3
- Absent cremasteric reflex: 1 point 3
- Nausea/vomiting: 1 point 3
- High-riding testis: 1 point 3
Score interpretation:
- ≤2 points: Low risk (negative predictive value 100%) 3
- 3-4 points: Intermediate risk (requires imaging) 3
- ≥5 points: High risk (positive predictive value 100%, proceed directly to surgical exploration) 3
Definitive Diagnostic Imaging
Duplex Doppler Ultrasound (First-Line Modality)
This is the standard of care for ruling out surgical emergencies. 1
Key ultrasound findings to assess:
For testicular torsion:
- Decreased or absent testicular blood flow on color/power Doppler (sensitivity 96-100%, specificity 84-95%) 1
- "Whirlpool sign" on grayscale—twisted spermatic cord (sensitivity 96%, specificity 99%) 1, 5
- Heterogeneous testicular echotexture (suggests nonviable testis) 1
- Power Doppler is more sensitive than color Doppler for detecting low-flow states, especially in prepubertal testes 1
For epididymitis:
- Enlarged epididymis with increased blood flow on color Doppler 1
- Scrotal wall thickening and reactive hydrocele 1
- Up to 20% may have concomitant orchitis 1
For normal anatomy (ruling out pathology):
- Symmetric testicular blood flow bilaterally 1
- Normal homogeneous testicular echotexture 1
- Normal linear spermatic cord without twist 1
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
Do not rely solely on physical examination—case reports document torsion with present cremasteric reflex and torsion with non-tender testicles 2
Do not delay imaging in intermediate-risk patients—ultrasound should be performed emergently, not routinely scheduled 1
Do not order CT or MRI as initial imaging—these are not appropriate for acute scrotal pain evaluation 1
Do not assume normal urinalysis excludes torsion—patients with torsion can have completely normal urinalysis 1
Beware of intermittent torsion—even MRI cannot definitively rule this out, and clinical suspicion should drive management 1
When Ultrasound is Equivocal
If duplex Doppler ultrasound findings are inconclusive:
- Contrast-enhanced ultrasound can improve detection of testicular perfusion (though not FDA-approved for scrotal imaging as of guideline publication) 1
- Microvascular imaging ultrasound uses advanced algorithms to detect very slow flow 1
- When clinical suspicion remains high despite equivocal imaging, proceed to surgical exploration—the risk of testicular loss outweighs the risk of negative exploration 1