What type of abdominal x-ray (abdominal radiograph) is required for a case of chicken bone swallowing?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 15, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Abdominal X-ray for Chicken Bone Ingestion

Abdominal x-ray has limited utility for chicken bone ingestion due to false-negative rates up to 85%, and CT scan should be performed instead in symptomatic patients or those with high clinical suspicion. 1

Why Plain X-ray is Inadequate

  • Chicken bones are poorly radiopaque and frequently missed on plain radiography, with false-negative rates reaching 85% for chicken bones specifically 1
  • Even when visible, plain x-rays cannot adequately assess for complications such as perforation, penetration, or abscess formation 2
  • The overall false-negative rate for esophageal foreign bodies is up to 47%, making plain radiography unreliable for ruling out ingested foreign bodies 1, 3

The Correct Imaging Approach

CT scan is the imaging modality of choice for suspected chicken bone ingestion, with the following performance characteristics:

  • CT has 90-100% sensitivity and 93.7-100% specificity for detecting foreign bodies 1, 3
  • CT is essential for locating the bone, evaluating complications (perforation, abscess, obstruction), and guiding management decisions 1, 2
  • CT can identify secondary signs of perforation even when the bone itself is subtle, including free air, fluid collections, and inflammatory changes 2

When to Obtain CT Imaging

Proceed directly to CT scan in the following scenarios:

  • Any symptomatic patient with suspected chicken bone ingestion, regardless of x-ray findings 1, 3
  • Patients with persistent symptoms (dysphagia, chest pain, abdominal pain, odynophagia) despite negative x-ray 1, 3
  • High clinical suspicion based on history, even with negative plain films 1
  • Signs suggesting perforation: peritoneal irritation, fever, leukocytosis 4, 2

Role of Ultrasound

  • Ultrasound can successfully diagnose chicken bone perforation and may be superior to CT for characterizing the shape and length of the foreign body through multiaxial real-time imaging 5
  • Ultrasound can detect secondary signs of perforation (fluid collections, inflammatory changes) even when the bone is not directly visualized 2, 5
  • Consider ultrasound as a complement to CT, particularly for follow-up or when CT findings are equivocal 5

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never rely on a negative x-ray to exclude chicken bone ingestion in symptomatic patients 1, 2
  • Do not delay CT imaging while waiting for symptoms to resolve, as complications like aortoesophageal fistula can be fatal 6
  • Chicken bones can cause delayed perforation days to weeks after ingestion, requiring ongoing vigilance even after initial negative imaging 4, 6
  • Sharp chicken bone fragments in the esophagus require emergent endoscopy within 2-6 hours due to high perforation risk 1, 3

Laboratory Workup for Symptomatic Patients

  • Obtain CBC, CRP, and inflammatory markers if perforation is suspected 1
  • Blood gas analysis and serum creatinine should be obtained for patients requiring intervention 1

References

Guideline

Management of Foreign Body Ingestion Not Visible on X-ray

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Glass Visibility on X-ray

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Fatal aortoesophageal fistula resulting from ingestion of chicken bone.

Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP, 2007

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.