What are the management options for advanced urothelial cancer according to European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 15, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Advanced Urothelial Cancer Management According to ESMO

For first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma, enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab is now the preferred regimen, delivering a median overall survival of 31.5 months compared to 16.1 months with platinum-based chemotherapy (HR 0.47). 1

First-Line Treatment Algorithm

Preferred Regimen (All Patients)

  • Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab is the new standard of care, achieving:
    • Overall survival: 31.5 months vs 16.1 months with chemotherapy 1
    • Progression-free survival gain: 6.2 months 1
    • Objective response rate: 67.7% vs 44.4% with chemotherapy 1
    • ESMO-MCBS score: 4 (highest clinical benefit) 1
    • Grade 3+ treatment-related adverse events: 55.9% (lower than chemotherapy at 69.5%) 1

Alternative First-Line Options

For cisplatin-eligible patients who cannot receive enfortumab vedotin:

  • Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) remains a strong alternative 1
  • High-dose MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, cisplatin) with G-CSF 1
  • Either regimen should be given for up to 6 cycles 1

For cisplatin-ineligible but carboplatin-eligible patients:

  • Carboplatin plus gemcitabine 1
  • This combination is inferior to cisplatin-based regimens but appropriate when cisplatin is contraindicated 1

For patients unfit for any platinum-based therapy:

  • Single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (pembrolizumab or atezolizumab) have a limited role and should not be routinely recommended 1
  • These agents may be considered only in highly selected patients with high PD-L1 expression (CPS ≥10 for pembrolizumab, IC ≥5% for atezolizumab) 1

Maintenance Therapy

For patients achieving stable disease or better after platinum-based chemotherapy:

  • Avelumab maintenance is mandatory, providing: 1
    • Overall survival gain: 8.8 months 1
    • Median OS: 21.4 months vs 14.3 months with best supportive care 1
    • ESMO-MCBS score: 4 1
  • Start avelumab within 4-10 weeks of completing chemotherapy 1
  • Continue until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity 1

Second-Line Treatment (After Platinum and Immunotherapy)

The treatment sequence depends on prior therapy:

If Prior Platinum + ICI (Sequential or Concurrent):

  1. Enfortumab vedotin (if not used first-line):

    • Overall survival gain: 3.97 months 1
    • HR 0.70 vs chemotherapy 1
    • ESMO-MCBS score: 4 1
  2. Erdafitinib for FGFR2/3 alterations:

    • Only for patients with susceptible FGFR3 or FGFR2 genetic alterations 1
    • Overall survival gain: 4.3 months 1
    • HR 0.64 vs chemotherapy 1
    • ESMO-MCBS score: 4 1
    • FDA approved, not EMA approved 1
  3. Sacituzumab govitecan:

    • Can be recommended after platinum and ICI 1
    • ESMO-MCBS score: 2 (moderate benefit) 1
    • FDA approved, not EMA approved 1
  4. Pembrolizumab (if not previously given):

    • Overall survival gain: 2.9 months 1
    • HR 0.71 vs chemotherapy 1
    • ESMO-MCBS score: 4 1

Critical Management Considerations

Molecular testing requirements:

  • FGFR2/3 genetic alterations should be tested in all patients with advanced disease to identify erdafitinib candidates 1
  • PD-L1 testing is no longer critical for first-line decisions given the superiority of enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab 1

Cisplatin eligibility criteria (any one criterion makes patient ineligible):

  • Creatinine clearance <60 mL/min 1
  • ECOG performance status ≥2 1
  • Grade ≥2 hearing loss 1
  • Grade ≥2 neuropathy 1
  • NYHA Class III heart failure 1

Common pitfall: Single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors should not be used routinely in first-line treatment, even in cisplatin-ineligible patients, as they have demonstrated limited efficacy compared to combination approaches 1. The era of monotherapy immunotherapy in first-line advanced urothelial cancer has effectively ended with the approval of enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab.

Nivolumab plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy showed only modest benefit (OS gain 2.8 months, ESMO-MCBS score: 2) and is not preferred over enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab 1.

Third- and Fourth-Line Options

For patients progressing after enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab, consider treatments not previously given 1:

  • Platinum-based chemotherapy (if not used first-line) 1
  • Vinflunine or taxanes 1
  • Clinical trials with novel agents 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.