Is Baclofen Indicated for Intractable Cough?
Baclofen is not routinely indicated for intractable cough due to lack of high-quality evidence from double-blind placebo-controlled trials, though it may be considered as a later-line option in highly refractory cases after standard therapies have failed, particularly for gastroesophageal reflux-induced chronic cough. 1
Evidence Quality and Limitations
The evidence supporting baclofen for intractable cough is weak and consists primarily of:
- No double-blind placebo-controlled trials exist for baclofen in pathologic cough, despite animal studies and open-label human data showing potential benefit 1
- Case reports and small open-label studies showing suppression of ACE inhibitor-induced cough and chronic refractory cough 1, 2
- One systematic review identified baclofen among neuromodulators studied for chronic idiopathic cough, but noted significant methodologic limitations 1
Mechanism and Theoretical Rationale
Baclofen acts as a GABA-B receptor agonist with both central and spinal mechanisms:
- Spinal action on the efferent limb of the cough reflex, potentially reducing intense expiratory efforts during repetitive coughing 1
- Demonstrated antitussive activity in animal models and suppression of capsaicin-induced cough in humans 1
- May reduce cough hypersensitivity in gastroesophageal reflux-related cough 1, 3
Clinical Trial Data
Comparative Effectiveness
- A 2019 randomized trial (n=217 completers) compared gabapentin versus baclofen for suspected refractory GERD-induced chronic cough 3
- Similar efficacy: Success rates were comparable (gabapentin 57.3% vs baclofen 53.0%, p=0.550) 3
- Inferior tolerability: Baclofen caused significantly more somnolence (35.0% vs 20.5%, p=0.013) and dizziness (23.9% vs 11.1%, p=0.010) compared to gabapentin 3
Other Studies
- Small studies (n=12-16 patients) showed 53-56% response rates in refractory GERD-induced cough when added to proton pump inhibitors 4, 5
- Improvements in cough sensitivity to capsaicin and symptom scores observed 4, 3
Side Effect Profile
Baclofen has a challenging side effect profile that limits its clinical utility: 1
- Common adverse effects include somnolence, dizziness, and fatigue 4, 3
- May inhibit swallowing function through central mechanisms 6
- Abrupt discontinuation must be avoided due to potential withdrawal symptoms 6
- Requires dose adjustment in renal impairment 6
Guideline Recommendations and Expert Consensus
For Lung Cancer-Related Intractable Cough
- The 2017 CHEST guideline suggests baclofen may be considered using N-of-1 randomized controlled trials when surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, and standard therapies have failed 1
- This is an ungraded consensus-based statement reflecting the lack of definitive evidence 1
For Unexplained Chronic Cough
- The 2016 CHEST guideline on unexplained chronic cough does not include baclofen in formal recommendations 1
- Gabapentin received a formal recommendation (Grade 2C) over baclofen for unexplained chronic cough 1
For GERD-Related Symptoms
- The 2023 AGA clinical practice update notes baclofen is not routinely recommended as primary or adjunctive therapy for extraesophageal reflux symptoms due to its challenging side effect profile 1
Clinical Algorithm for Use
If considering baclofen for intractable cough, follow this approach:
Exclude and treat all identifiable causes of chronic cough first (asthma, GERD, postnasal drip, ACE inhibitors, etc.) 1
Try first-line neuromodulators first:
Consider baclofen only if:
Dosing approach:
For lung cancer patients with intractable cough:
- Consider N-of-1 trial design with randomization, blinding, and patient-important outcomes 1
Key Clinical Pitfalls
- Do not use baclofen as first-line therapy for any type of chronic cough given lack of robust evidence and inferior tolerability compared to gabapentin 1, 3
- Avoid in elderly patients or those with renal impairment without dose adjustment due to increased CNS effects 6
- Never stop abruptly after prolonged use due to withdrawal risk 6
- Do not expect universal response: Even in selected populations, only 50-60% of patients respond 4, 3