Is one core 1 biomarker, either Amyloid beta (Aβ) or Hyperphosphorylated tau (T1), sufficient for an AD diagnosis, or are both required?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 15, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

According to 2025 Diagnostic Criteria: Both Core 1 Biomarkers (Amyloid Beta AND Hyperphosphorylated Tau) Are NOT Required—Either One Alone Is Sufficient

According to the 2025 Alzheimer's Association diagnostic criteria, an abnormal Core 1 biomarker result—either amyloid beta (Aβ) OR hyperphosphorylated tau (T1)—is sufficient to establish a biological diagnosis of AD. 1, 2

Understanding the Core 1 Biomarker Framework

The 2025 criteria define Core 1 biomarkers as:

  • Aβ ("A"): Detected via PET, CSF, or plasma 1
  • Hyperphosphorylated tau ("T1"): Specific CSF or plasma tau species including p-tau 217, p-tau 181, and p-tau 231 1

A single abnormal Core 1 biomarker (either A or T1) is sufficient to establish the diagnosis of AD and inform clinical decision-making throughout the disease continuum. 2 This represents a fundamental shift from requiring both biomarker categories.

The Biological Definition Approach

The 2025 criteria define AD as a biological process rather than purely a clinical syndrome 2. This means:

  • AD diagnosis begins with the appearance of AD neuropathologic change (ADNPC), even while patients are asymptomatic 2
  • Core 1 biomarkers map onto either the amyloid beta pathway OR the AD tauopathy pathway, but both reflect the presence of ADNPC more generally (neuritic plaques and tangles) 2
  • An abnormal result in either pathway is sufficient because both indicate the underlying AD pathological process 2

Clinical Application Algorithm

For Establishing AD Diagnosis:

  1. If amyloid biomarker (PET, CSF, or plasma Aβ42/40) is positive → AD diagnosis established 1, 2
  2. If hyperphosphorylated tau biomarker (p-tau 217, p-tau 181, or p-tau 231) is positive → AD diagnosis established 1, 2
  3. Either one alone is sufficient; you do NOT need both 2

For Increasing Diagnostic Confidence:

  • Core 2 biomarkers (tau PET, specific CSF tau species like p-tau 205) provide prognostic information and when abnormal, increase confidence that AD is contributing to symptoms 1
  • Having both Core 1 biomarkers positive increases certainty, but this is not required for diagnosis 1, 2

Important Distinction from Older Criteria

This differs significantly from earlier frameworks:

  • The 2011 NIA-AA criteria suggested that for high likelihood of dementia being due to AD, biomarkers of both Aβ and neuronal injury were needed 1
  • The 2025 criteria explicitly state that a single Core 1 biomarker is sufficient for AD diagnosis 2
  • The older approach treated biomarkers as supportive evidence; the new approach treats them as diagnostic 2

Critical Caveats

When Both Biomarkers Are Tested:

  • If both Core 1 biomarkers (Aβ AND tau) are positive: High likelihood dementia is due to AD 1
  • If both are absent: Dementia is highly likely NOT due to AD 1
  • If results are conflicting (one positive, one negative): Likelihood is intermediate 1

Clinical Context Matters:

  • Biomarkers alone are not sufficient for confident diagnosis—they should be supplementary to clinical assessment 3
  • AD biomarkers should not be used as standalone diagnostic tests for symptomatic AD, as cognitive symptoms often have multiple causes 1
  • The diagnosis still requires ruling out other conditions that could substantially affect cognition 1

For Treatment Decisions:

  • Positive amyloid PET is required before initiating anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody therapy 1
  • In this specific context, amyloid biomarker confirmation is mandatory, though the modality (PET, CSF, or plasma) is not specified 1

Practical Implementation

For asymptomatic individuals (Stage 1): Biomarker evidence alone establishes AD diagnosis 1

For symptomatic patients (MCI or dementia):

  • Clinical syndrome consistent with AD PLUS
  • Either positive amyloid biomarker OR positive hyperphosphorylated tau biomarker
  • Equals sufficient criteria for AD diagnosis 2

The key paradigm shift: AD is now defined by biology (presence of pathology) rather than by clinical symptoms, and a single Core 1 biomarker abnormality is the threshold for biological diagnosis 2.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Revised criteria for diagnosis and staging of Alzheimer's disease: Alzheimer's Association Workgroup.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2024

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.