What is the ethical principle behind multifetal pregnancy reduction in a triplet pregnancy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: March 31, 2025 • View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

The ethical principle behind the decision to perform a multifetal pregnancy reduction to a singleton pregnancy is patient autonomy, as it recognizes the patient's right to make informed decisions about her own healthcare based on her values, preferences, and circumstances. This principle is supported by the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, which emphasizes the importance of respecting pregnant individuals' autonomy to make decisions that best align with their core values after counseling that provides all medically appropriate options for informed decision-making 1. In this case, the physician provided the patient with information about the risks associated with a triplet pregnancy, including increased maternal risks such as preeclampsia with severe features and fetal risks such as preterm delivery and prematurity. The physician also presented various management options including continuing the multifetal gestation, pregnancy reduction, or selective termination. After being fully informed of these options and their implications, the patient made an autonomous decision to proceed with multifetal pregnancy reduction to a singleton pregnancy. This decision respects her right to determine what happens to her body and what risks she is willing to accept, balancing her desire for a successful pregnancy with the associated health risks of carrying triplets.

The principles of beneficence (doing good) and non-maleficence (avoiding harm) may also be relevant in this scenario, as the decision to perform a multifetal pregnancy reduction is intended to improve the chances of a successful pregnancy and reduce the risks of complications for both the mother and the fetus 1. However, the primary ethical principle guiding this decision-making process is respect for the patient's autonomy. The patient's autonomy is further supported by the fact that she was fully informed of the risks and benefits of each management option, and she made a decision that aligns with her values and preferences.

It is also important to note that the decision to perform a multifetal pregnancy reduction is a complex one, and it requires careful consideration of the potential risks and benefits. The patient's decision to proceed with the reduction was likely influenced by a variety of factors, including her medical history, her personal values and preferences, and her understanding of the potential risks and benefits of each management option. Ultimately, the decision to perform a multifetal pregnancy reduction is a personal one, and it should be made by the patient in consultation with her healthcare provider.

Some key points to consider in this scenario include:

  • The patient's autonomy and right to make informed decisions about her own healthcare
  • The importance of providing the patient with accurate and unbiased information about the risks and benefits of each management option
  • The need to consider the potential risks and benefits of each management option, including the risks of complications for both the mother and the fetus
  • The importance of respecting the patient's values and preferences in the decision-making process
  • The role of the healthcare provider in providing guidance and support to the patient as she makes her decision.

From the Research

Ethical Principle Behind Multifetal Pregnancy Reduction

The decision to perform a multifetal pregnancy reduction to a singleton pregnancy is based on the ethical principle of proportionality, which aims to obtain the most good for the least harm while looking for areas of moral compromise to achieve the best outcomes 2. This principle is applied in the context of multifetal pregnancy reduction, where the goal is to increase the survival and well-being of the remaining fetuses from high-order multiple gestations.

Key Considerations

  • The procedure of multifetal pregnancy reduction is considered ethically acceptable, especially when it involves reducing triplets or quadruplets to twins or a singleton, as it can improve the outcomes for the remaining fetuses 3, 4.
  • The decision to reduce a multifetal pregnancy to a singleton is typically made after thorough counseling of the patients, taking into account the potential risks and benefits of the procedure 3.
  • The ethical principle of proportionality is used to weigh the potential benefits of reducing the number of fetuses against the potential risks and harms associated with the procedure 2.
  • The goal of multifetal pregnancy reduction is to reduce the risk of preterm delivery and improve the outcomes for the remaining fetuses, while also minimizing the risks to the mother's health 4, 5.

Relevant Studies

  • A study published in the Journal of Perinatal Medicine found that reducing triplets to singletons was associated with a higher gestational age at delivery, heavier neonates, and a reduction in the cesarean section rate 3.
  • A study published in Seminars in Reproductive Medicine discussed the evolution of the ethical arguments surrounding multifetal pregnancy reduction, highlighting the importance of proportionality in decision-making 2.
  • Other studies have also explored the ethical and legal issues surrounding multifetal pregnancy reduction, including the potential risks and benefits of the procedure and the importance of informed consent 6, 5.

References

1
Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

2
Research

Multifetal pregnancy reduction: evolution of the ethical arguments.

Seminars in reproductive medicine, 2010

4
Research

Multifetal Pregnancy Reduction.

Clinical obstetrics and gynecology, 2015

6
Research

Multiple pregnancy: legal and ethical issues.

International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2008

Related Questions

What intervention is indicated for a 28-year-old gravida 1 para 0 (first pregnancy, no previous births) woman at 16 weeks gestation with a history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 (CIN 3) and a family history of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), presenting with normal vital signs, including normothermia (normal temperature), normotension (normal blood pressure), and a normal fetal heart rate?
What is the most appropriate next step in managing a 24-year-old woman, gravida (number of times pregnant) 2, para (number of viable births) 1, at 37 weeks gestation, presenting with symptoms of exhaustion, shortness of breath, bilateral pitting edema, and a systolic ejection murmur, with normal blood pressure, tachycardia, and trace proteinuria?
What is the purpose of Direct Antiglobulin Test (DAT) in newborn blood bank testing?
What is the best next step in managing a patient with suspected sarcoidosis, presenting with hypercalcemia, bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy, and pulmonary opacities?
Should antibiotics be administered prior to biopsy for vertebral osteomyelitis (infection of the vertebral bone)?
What is the indication for intrapartum Group B Streptococcus (GBS) prophylaxis in a 23-year-old woman, gravida 2, para 1, at 37 weeks gestation with a history of prior term vaginal delivery complicated by intraamniotic infection and early-onset neonatal sepsis?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

Ask Question