What is the most accurate description of the outcomes from the START (Strategic Timing of Antiretroviral Treatment) study regarding initiation of early Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) for patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 15, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

START Study Outcomes: Early ART Initiation

The START study demonstrated decreased risk of both AIDS-related events AND serious non-AIDS-related events with early ART initiation, making none of the provided options fully accurate, though option A comes closest by correctly identifying decreased AIDS-related events.

Primary Findings from START

The Strategic Timing of Antiretroviral Treatment (START) trial enrolled 4,684 ART-naive HIV-positive adults with CD4+ counts >500 cells/mm³ and compared immediate versus deferred treatment (initiated when CD4 dropped to <350 cells/mm³) 1.

Key Outcomes Demonstrated:

  • Early ART initiation reduced the composite primary endpoint of AIDS, serious non-AIDS events, or death by 57% (HR 0.47,95% CI 0.34-0.65; P<0.001) through 2015 1

  • Both AIDS-related AND serious non-AIDS-related events were reduced with immediate treatment, contradicting the premise of options A and B that suggest only one category benefited 1

  • Mortality reduction was significant: The study showed decreased overall mortality with early treatment, supporting benefits regardless of CD4 count 1

  • Long-term follow-up through 2021 revealed persistent excess risk among those who deferred treatment, even after eventually initiating ART (HR 0.79,95% CI 0.60-1.04 post-2016 versus HR 0.47 pre-2016) 1

Why Each Answer Option is Problematic:

Option A - Partially Correct but Incomplete

  • Correctly identifies decreased AIDS-related events 1
  • Incorrectly states increased non-AIDS-related events - START actually showed decreased serious non-AIDS events with early treatment 1

Option B - Incorrect

  • Contradicts START findings - the study demonstrated reduced AIDS-related events, not similar risk 1
  • Non-AIDS event reduction was present but not the distinguishing feature 1

Option C - Not the Primary Outcome

  • While HIV transmission reduction was demonstrated in HPTN 052 (HR 0.11,95% CI 0.04-0.32) 2, this was not START's primary focus
  • Treatment-related side effects were not reduced; this was not a measured outcome 1

Option D - Most Accurate Available

  • Mortality reduction was demonstrated across CD4 strata in pooled analyses (RR 0.90,95% CI 0.82-0.99) 3
  • Chinese cohort data confirmed 63% mortality reduction with immediate ART even at CD4 >500 cells/mm³ (adjusted HR 0.37,95% CI 0.23-0.58) 4
  • START specifically enrolled patients with CD4 >500 cells/mm³, demonstrating benefit regardless of baseline CD4 count 1

Clinical Implications from START:

  • Current guidelines now recommend immediate ART initiation for all HIV-positive individuals regardless of CD4 count, based largely on START findings 5

  • The benefit of early treatment persists long-term, with those who deferred treatment showing continued excess risk even after eventually starting ART 1

  • Time-averaged CD4 difference of 199 cells/mm³ was maintained between immediate and deferred groups through 2015, translating to clinical benefit 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Immediate Antiretroviral Therapy Decreases Mortality Among Patients With High CD4 Counts in China: A Nationwide, Retrospective Cohort Study.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2018

Guideline

Duration of Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV Patients

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.