When to Use PEEP in Mechanically Ventilated Patients
PEEP should be applied to all mechanically ventilated patients to prevent alveolar collapse, with a minimum of 5 cm H₂O as the baseline for any patient requiring mechanical ventilation, and higher levels (10-15 cm H₂O) specifically indicated for patients with moderate to severe ARDS (PaO₂/FiO₂ <200 mm Hg). 1, 2
Universal Baseline PEEP Application
- Apply PEEP 5 cm H₂O as the standard minimum for all mechanically ventilated patients to prevent lung derecruitment and atelectasis 1
- Zero PEEP (ZEEP) is explicitly not recommended in any mechanically ventilated patient 1
- This baseline PEEP ameliorates changes in closing volume and prevents cyclic alveolar collapse, often providing dramatic improvements in PaO₂ 1
- The 5 cm H₂O minimum is required for ARDS diagnosis per the Berlin definition 2
PEEP Strategy Based on ARDS Severity
Moderate to Severe ARDS (PaO₂/FiO₂ <200 mm Hg)
- Use higher PEEP levels (typically 10-15 cm H₂O) for patients with moderate to severe ARDS 1, 2
- Individual patient data meta-analysis demonstrated mortality reduction with higher PEEP (mean 15.1 ± 3.6 cm H₂O) versus lower PEEP (mean 9.1 ± 2.7 cm H₂O) specifically in this subgroup 1, 2
- The adjusted relative risk for mortality was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.81-1.00) in moderate/severe ARDS patients receiving higher PEEP 1
Mild ARDS (PaO₂/FiO₂ 200-300 mm Hg)
- Use lower PEEP (<10 cm H₂O) for mild ARDS, as higher PEEP showed no mortality benefit and potential harm in this subgroup 1, 2
- In patients with cirrhosis and mild ARDS, low PEEP strategy is specifically recommended to minimize impairment of venous return and cardiac preload 1
Non-ARDS Patients
- Maintain PEEP 5-8 cm H₂O for patients without ARDS undergoing mechanical ventilation 1
- Physiological data in patients without lung injury suggests 3-5 cm H₂O is appropriate 1
Critical Monitoring Parameters During PEEP Titration
- Always maintain plateau pressure ≤30 cm H₂O regardless of PEEP level 1, 2
- Target driving pressure (plateau pressure minus PEEP) <15 cm H₂O, as this predicts outcomes better than other ventilatory parameters 2
- Monitor for hemodynamic compromise, particularly in patients with baseline vasodilation or sepsis 1, 3
- Avoid excessive PEEP (>15 cm H₂O) that causes lung overdistension and impairs right ventricular function 2
Specific Clinical Scenarios
Sepsis-Related Respiratory Failure
- Apply PEEP to maintain oxygen saturation approximately 88-90% (PaO₂ ~60 mm Hg) with FiO₂ ideally <0.60 1
- PEEP is appropriate and may provide dramatic improvements in PaO₂ in septic patients 1
Intraoperative Mechanical Ventilation
- Set initial PEEP at 5 cm H₂O for all surgical patients; ZEEP is not recommended 1
- Consider higher PEEP with recruitment maneuvers during times when respiratory system compliance changes rapidly (e.g., pneumoperitoneum, steep Trendelenburg positioning) 1
Pediatric Patients
- Use PEEP 3-5 cm H₂O in children without lung injury 1
- Higher PEEP may be needed in severe pediatric ARDS, but careful titration is mandatory to avoid cardiovascular compromise 1
- Be cautious with PEEP levels of 10-12 cm H₂O in children with mild-moderate PARDS, as this significantly increases mechanical power and driving pressure 4
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not use uniform PEEP for all ARDS patients—severity-based stratification is essential, as mild ARDS patients may be harmed by high PEEP 2
- Do not increase PEEP without monitoring plateau pressure—the 30 cm H₂O plateau pressure limit remains absolute 1, 2
- Do not neglect driving pressure—a low driving pressure (<15 cm H₂O) should guide PEEP optimization alongside oxygenation 2
- Do not assume higher PEEP always improves tissue oxygen delivery—despite improving arterial oxygenation, high PEEP can reduce cardiac output and decrease peripheral oxygen delivery by up to 25% 3
- Do not routinely apply recruitment maneuvers with PEEP—they are conditionally recommended only for moderate/severe ARDS, not as routine therapy 1
- Do not use high-frequency oscillatory ventilation with high baseline PEEP—this approach worsens hemodynamics and increases mortality 1, 2