Best Nuclear Medicine Study for Foot Osteomyelitis
Labeled white blood cell (WBC) scintigraphy using either 111-Indium or 99mTc-HMPAO is the best nuclear medicine study for diagnosing foot osteomyelitis, with sensitivity of 75-80% and specificity of 70-85%. 1
Primary Recommendation
Among all nuclear medicine procedures, labeled leukocyte imaging is the preferred choice for evaluating diabetic foot osteomyelitis according to nuclear medicine authorities. 1 This recommendation is supported by both the IWGDF (2016) and IDSA (2012) guidelines, which represent the highest quality evidence available.
- Labeled WBC scans achieve positive predictive values of 70-90% and negative predictive values of approximately 80% 1
- The positive likelihood ratio is 2.3 and negative likelihood ratio is 0.38 1
- These scans are not taken up by healthy bone, making them more specific than standard bone scans for diagnosing osteomyelitis and excluding Charcot neuroarthropathy 1
Why Not Three-Phase Bone Scan Alone?
Three-phase bone scans with 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate have poor specificity (only 30-45%) despite reasonable sensitivity (80-90%), making them inadequate as a standalone test. 1
- The positive predictive value is only 65% with a pooled diagnostic odds ratio of just 2.1 1
- A positive bone scan is not specific for osteomyelitis, especially in the forefoot, though a negative scan largely rules it out 1
- Meta-analyses found three-phase bone scan performance markedly inferior to MRI 1
Emerging Technology: WBC SPECT/CT
99mTc WBC-labeled SPECT/CT represents the most advanced nuclear medicine option, providing superior spatial resolution with three-dimensional CT images combined with WBC uptake intensity. 1
- Demonstrates sensitivity of 87.5%, specificity of 71.4%, positive predictive value of 83.3%, and negative predictive value of 77.8% in diabetic foot osteomyelitis 1
- Grading WBC uptake intensity can serve as a prognostic tool to predict treatment outcomes 1
- Negative uptake on WBC SPECT/CT is a reliable marker for remission and can guide optimal antibiotic duration 1
When MRI is Unavailable
If MRI is unavailable or contraindicated, the IDSA recommends a leukocyte or antigranulocyte scan, preferably combined with a bone scan. 1 However, this dual-tracer technique does not substantially improve diagnostic accuracy over labeled leukocyte scanning alone. 1
Important Caveats
- MRI generally outperforms all nuclear medicine studies for diagnosing foot osteomyelitis, with sensitivity around 90% and specificity around 85% 1
- The IDSA explicitly states: "We do not recommend any other type of nuclear medicine investigations" beyond leukocyte/antigranulocyte scans combined with bone scans 1
- Combining labeled leukocyte scans with bone scans (dual-tracer technique) does not meaningfully improve accuracy 1
- 67Ga-citrate scanning provides little additional diagnostic value beyond what is available from labeled WBC imaging 2
Practical Algorithm
- Start with plain radiographs to identify obvious bony destruction, though sensitivity is only 54% and specificity 68% 1
- If MRI is available and not contraindicated, use MRI as the imaging study of choice 1
- If MRI is unavailable or contraindicated, proceed with labeled WBC scintigraphy (111-Indium or 99mTc-HMPAO) 1
- Consider WBC SPECT/CT if available for superior anatomic localization and prognostic information 1