What is person-centered therapy (PCT) and how is it used to treat anxiety, depression, or trauma?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Person-Centered Therapy (PCT): Definition and Clinical Applications

What is Person-Centered Therapy?

Person-centered therapy (PCT), also called client-centered therapy, is a non-trauma-focused, manualized psychotherapy that emphasizes present awareness of self, therapeutic relationship, and the client's inherent capacity for growth without directly processing traumatic memories. 1, 2

PCT operates on Carl Rogers' theoretical framework that individuals possess an innate tendency toward self-actualization and psychological growth when provided with core therapeutic conditions: unconditional positive regard, empathy, and genuineness. 2 The therapy focuses on the here-and-now of client awareness rather than systematic exposure to or cognitive restructuring of traumatic material. 1, 3

Evidence for PCT in Treating Depression

Comparative Effectiveness with CBT

For moderate to severe depression, PCT demonstrates non-inferiority to CBT at 6 months post-treatment, though CBT may show superior outcomes at 12 months. 4

  • In a large pragmatic trial (n=510) within England's IAPT service, PCT achieved similar depression reduction to CBT at 6 months (mean PHQ-9 difference -0.35,95% CI -1.53 to 0.84). 4
  • However, at 12-month follow-up, CBT demonstrated superiority with a clinically meaningful difference (adjusted mean difference 1.73,95% CI 0.26-3.19). 4
  • PCT had lower treatment dropout rates compared to CBT, making it a viable option when patient retention is a concern or when CBT is unavailable. 4

Clinical Positioning

PCT is appropriate as a first-line treatment for depression when:

  • CBT is unavailable or has long wait times 4
  • The patient expresses strong preference for non-directive, relationship-focused therapy 4
  • Previous CBT attempts resulted in dropout 4

However, for sustained long-term outcomes beyond 6 months, CBT should be prioritized over PCT for depression treatment. 4

Evidence for PCT in Treating Anxiety

The evidence base for PCT specifically targeting anxiety disorders is limited, with most anxiety-related outcomes measured as secondary endpoints in depression or PTSD trials. 4, 3

  • In the IAPT trial, no significant differences emerged between PCT and CBT on anxiety measures when both were used to treat depression. 4
  • Patient-centered care models for anxiety emphasize individualized assessment and shared decision-making, but do not specifically endorse PCT as a primary modality. 5

For primary anxiety disorders, evidence-based CBT approaches (including exposure therapy and cognitive restructuring) remain the gold standard, with PCT serving as an alternative when CBT is contraindicated or unavailable. 6

Evidence for PCT in Treating Trauma and PTSD

Effectiveness Compared to Control Conditions

PCT is moderately effective for PTSD when compared to waitlist or minimal attention controls (SMD -0.84,95% CI -1.10 to -0.59), but this should not be the primary consideration for treatment selection. 3

Critical Comparison with Trauma-Focused Therapies

PCT does NOT achieve non-inferiority to trauma-focused CBT (TF-CBT) for PTSD treatment at post-treatment assessment, with clinically meaningful differences favoring TF-CBT (MD 6.83 points on CAPS, 95% CI 1.90 to 11.76). 3

  • The treatment effect gap between PCT and TF-CBT narrows over time, with smaller differences at 6-month (MD 1.59) and 12-month (MD 1.22) follow-ups. 3
  • PCT demonstrates approximately 14% lower treatment dropout rates compared to TF-CBT (RD -0.14,95% CI -0.18 to -0.10). 3

When PCT May Be Appropriate for Trauma

PCT should be considered for PTSD only when trauma-focused therapies are unavailable, not tolerated, or explicitly refused by the patient—it is not a first-line treatment. 3

Current clinical practice guidelines consistently recommend trauma-focused therapies (prolonged exposure, cognitive processing therapy, EMDR) as first-line treatments for PTSD. 6, 7 These approaches directly address traumatic memories and achieve superior outcomes (40-87% of patients no longer meeting PTSD criteria after 9-15 sessions). 6, 7

Critical Pitfalls When Considering PCT for Trauma

Do not use PCT as a "stabilization phase" before trauma-focused treatment—this delays access to effective care and communicates to patients they are incapable of processing traumatic memories. 6, 8, 7

  • The assumption that patients need extensive emotion regulation training before trauma processing is not supported by evidence. 6, 8
  • Affect dysregulation, dissociation, and emotional instability improve with direct trauma-focused treatment, not through prolonged stabilization. 8, 7
  • Labeling patients as requiring "complex" or "phase-based" approaches has iatrogenic effects by suggesting standard trauma treatments will be ineffective. 8, 7

Psychological debriefing (a brief intervention sometimes confused with supportive therapy like PCT) administered within 24-72 hours post-trauma is contraindicated and may worsen outcomes. 6, 7

Theoretical Compatibility and Integration

Rogers' person-centered theory, developed before the PTSD diagnosis existed, contains concepts consistent with contemporary trauma theory regarding threat-related psychological processes and post-traumatic growth. 2 The therapy's emphasis on unconditional positive regard and empathic understanding can facilitate processing of trauma-related shame and self-blame. 2

However, theoretical compatibility does not translate to superior clinical outcomes—trauma-focused approaches that directly address traumatic memories remain more effective for PTSD symptom reduction. 6, 3

Practical Clinical Algorithm

For Depression:

  1. Offer CBT as first-line treatment for sustained outcomes 4
  2. Consider PCT when CBT unavailable, patient preference strong, or previous CBT dropout 4
  3. Monitor at 6 months; if inadequate response, transition to CBT 4

For Anxiety Disorders:

  1. Prioritize evidence-based CBT with exposure components 6
  2. Consider PCT only as alternative when CBT contraindicated or unavailable 6

For PTSD/Trauma:

  1. Offer trauma-focused therapy (PE, CPT, EMDR) as first-line treatment 6, 7, 3
  2. Do NOT implement prolonged stabilization phases 8, 7
  3. Consider PCT only when: 3
    • Trauma-focused therapy unavailable
    • Patient explicitly refuses trauma-focused approaches after informed consent
    • Multiple failed trauma-focused therapy attempts with high dropout
  4. If using PCT, plan transition to trauma-focused therapy when feasible 3

The lower dropout rates with PCT (14% reduction vs TF-CBT) must be weighed against the clinically meaningful reduction in treatment effectiveness for PTSD. 3 Retaining patients in a less effective treatment may not serve their long-term recovery goals.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.