What are the NIX TB (New Isoniazid (Isoniazid) for Tuberculosis) trial, TB Practecal (Tuberculosis Practical) trial, and ZeNix (Zenyth, possibly a brand name, with generic name not specified) trial in tuberculosis treatment?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Summary of NIX-TB, TB PRACTECAL, and ZeNix Trials

NIX-TB Trial

The NIX-TB trial demonstrated that a 6-month, all-oral BPaL regimen (bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid) achieved approximately 90% treatment success in patients with pre-extensively drug-resistant (pre-XDR) TB or multidrug-resistant TB with treatment failure. 1

Study Design and Population

  • Single-arm trial without a control group, enrolling 109 participants in South Africa 1
  • Targeted patients with fluoroquinolone-resistant MDR-TB or those who had failed previous treatment 1
  • Linezolid was dosed at 1200 mg daily for the full 6 months 1

Efficacy Outcomes

  • Treatment success rate of 97.0% when comparing success versus failure or recurrence 1
  • Success rate of 93.2% when comparing treatment success versus death 1
  • Overall favorable outcome rate of 90.5% versus failure, recurrence, or death 1
  • Only 1.8% of patients were lost to follow-up 1

Safety Profile

  • Toxicity was substantial: 81% experienced peripheral neuropathy and 48% developed myelosuppression 1
  • 25.7% experienced at least one serious adverse event 1
  • 49% had at least one grade 3-4 adverse event related to study drugs 1
  • Almost one-third of patients stopped linezolid early due to adverse events 1
  • One death occurred from acute hemorrhagic pancreatitis (0.9%) 1

ZeNix Trial

The ZeNix trial optimized linezolid dosing within the BPaL regimen, demonstrating that 600 mg daily for 6 months provided the best risk-benefit ratio with favorable outcomes ranging from 84-93% across different dosing groups. 1

Study Design

  • Evaluated different linezolid doses (600 mg or 1200 mg daily) and durations (2 or 6 months) within the BPaL regimen 1
  • Designed specifically to address the optimal dose and duration of linezolid following the high toxicity observed in NIX-TB 1
  • No control arm, similar to NIX-TB 1

Key Findings

  • The 600 mg daily for 6 months group showed superior tolerability while maintaining efficacy 1
  • Favorable outcomes ranged between 84% and 93% across different linezolid dose groups 1
  • Six of nine participants with baseline phenotypic bedaquiline resistance achieved favorable outcomes 1
  • Confirmed the efficacy results of NIX-TB while demonstrating reduced toxicity with lower linezolid dosing 1

Clinical Impact

  • WHO currently recommends 600 mg daily linezolid throughout treatment, though this is based on very low certainty of evidence 1
  • Concerns remain about amplification of resistance in patients with extensive disease and unfavorable linezolid pharmacokinetics 1

TB PRACTECAL Trial

The TB PRACTECAL trial demonstrated that the 24-week, all-oral BPaLM regimen (bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid, moxifloxacin) was superior to standard care for rifampicin-resistant TB, with only 12% unfavorable outcomes compared to 41% with standard care. 2

Study Design and Population

  • Open-label, randomized, controlled, multi-arm, multicenter, non-inferiority trial 2
  • Conducted at seven sites in Uzbekistan, Belarus, and South Africa 2
  • Enrolled participants aged 15 years and older with pulmonary rifampicin-resistant TB 2
  • Stage two compared BPaLM (24 weeks) versus standard care (36-80 weeks) in a 1:1 ratio 2

Efficacy Results

  • Unfavorable outcomes occurred in only 16 (12%) of 137 participants in the BPaLM group versus 56 (41%) of 137 in the standard care group 2
  • Risk difference of -29.2 percentage points (96.6% CI -39.8 to -18.6), demonstrating both non-inferiority and superiority (p<0.0001) 2
  • Trial was stopped early due to superiority of the BPaLM regimen 1

Safety Outcomes

  • Only 23% of BPaLM recipients had grade 3 or higher adverse events or serious adverse events, compared to 48% receiving standard care 2
  • Risk difference of -25.2 percentage points (96.6% CI -36.4 to -13.9) favoring BPaLM 2
  • Five deaths occurred in the standard care group by week 72, with four judged treatment-related 2
  • No treatment-related deaths in the BPaLM group 2

Regulatory Impact

  • WHO added BPaLM to treatment guidance in 2022 as the preferred regimen for fluoroquinolone-susceptible MDR/RR-TB 1, 2
  • The regimen is recommended even though the trial included participants with fluoroquinolone-resistant TB 1
  • Expected to become the preferred regimen for adolescents and adults with pulmonary rifampicin-resistant TB 2

Comparative Context

Common Limitations

  • All three trials had relatively small sample sizes and lacked traditional control arms (NIX-TB and ZeNix) or were conducted in limited geographic settings 1
  • Monitoring linezolid side effects outside clinical trial settings in high-endemic, low-resource areas may be challenging 1
  • Drug susceptibility testing capacity for bedaquiline, linezolid, and pretomanid remains urgently needed 1

Emerging Concerns

  • Bedaquiline resistance acquisition has been reported in programmatic settings in South Africa 1
  • The optimal linezolid dosing remains based on very low certainty of evidence 1
  • Pretomanid's full adverse event profile, particularly hepatotoxicity and reproductive toxicity in humans, requires further documentation 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.