What is the evidence-based medicine (EBM) for serplulimab in cancer treatment?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Serplulimab: Evidence-Based Medicine Overview

Serplulimab is a novel anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody with demonstrated survival benefits in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) and emerging evidence in other malignancies, supported by high-quality phase III data showing superior overall survival compared to chemotherapy alone. 1, 2

Mechanism of Action

  • Serplulimab blocks the PD-1 receptor on T cells, preventing interaction with PD-L1/PD-L2 ligands and thereby releasing the brake on T cell activation to enable enhanced anti-tumor immune responses 2
  • The drug acts at the T cell-tumor cell interface, distinguishing it from anti-CTLA-4 agents that act at the T cell-dendritic cell interface 2
  • Serplulimab demonstrates similar or better affinity and pre-clinical antitumor activity compared to pembrolizumab and nivolumab 3

Primary Clinical Indication: Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

Efficacy Data from ASTRUM-005 Trial

The ASTRUM-005 phase III trial represents the highest quality evidence for serplulimab, establishing it as a standard first-line option for ES-SCLC:

  • Median overall survival: 15.4 months with serplulimab plus chemotherapy versus 10.9 months with chemotherapy alone (HR 0.63,95% CI 0.49-0.82, P < 0.001) 1, 4
  • Median progression-free survival: 5.7 months versus 4.3 months (HR 0.48,95% CI 0.38-0.59) 1, 4
  • Objective response rate: 80.2% versus 70.4% 1
  • One-year survival rate: 61% versus 48% 2

Updated Long-Term Results

With extended median follow-up of 19.8 months, the survival benefit was sustained with median OS of 15.8 months in the serplulimab group versus 11.1 months in placebo (HR 0.62,95% CI 0.50-0.76, P < 0.001) 5

Treatment Protocol for ES-SCLC

  • Serplulimab 4.5 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks combined with carboplatin and etoposide for 4 cycles, followed by maintenance serplulimab 1, 4
  • Treatment continues until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or up to 2 years 4
  • This regimen aligns with ASCO guideline recommendations for first-line platinum and etoposide plus immunotherapy in ES-SCLC 1

Emerging Indications

Colorectal Cancer (MSI-H/dMMR)

  • Serplulimab 3 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks is recommended by the 2024 Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) guidelines for dMMR/MSI-H colorectal cancer 1
  • This indication is supported by the broader evidence base for PD-1 inhibitors in MSI-H tumors, though specific phase III data for serplulimab in this setting are still emerging 1, 6

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (pMMR/MSS)

  • A phase 2 trial showed promising results with serplulimab plus HLX04 (bevacizumab biosimilar) and XELOX in treatment-naive mCRC 7
  • Median PFS was 17.2 months versus 10.7 months (HR 0.60,95% CI 0.31-1.14), with 95.7% of patients having MSS tumors 7
  • This represents an important potential breakthrough, as pMMR/MSS mCRC has historically been resistant to immunotherapy 7

Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

  • Phase 2 data show serplulimab combined with chemotherapy achieved 60% ORR and median PFS of 7.8 months in first-line treatment of advanced ESCC 8
  • As monotherapy in later-line settings, serplulimab showed 15% ORR with durable responses 8

Safety Profile and Toxicity Management

Overall Toxicity

  • Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 33.2% of patients in the ASTRUM-005 trial, compared to 27.6% with chemotherapy alone 4
  • The safety profile is manageable with predominantly grade 1-2 adverse events 2, 3
  • Treatment-related mortality ranges from 1.5-5% across immune checkpoint inhibitor trials, emphasizing the need for vigilant monitoring 2

Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs)

  • The incidence of irAEs with anti-PD-1 agents like serplulimab is ≤30% for any grade and ≤20% for grade ≥3 severity, lower than anti-CTLA-4 agents 2
  • Common immune-mediated side effects affect the skin, liver, kidneys, gastrointestinal tract, lungs, and endocrine systems 6
  • Pneumonitis is one of the most serious side effects, occurring in approximately 3-7% of patients on checkpoint inhibitor therapy 6
  • One treatment-related death from pneumonitis was reported in the ESCC combination study 8

Management Algorithm for irAEs

  • Early recognition and prompt intervention with immunosuppression (typically corticosteroids) is critical for managing irAEs 2
  • Multidisciplinary toxicity management is essential given the potential for treatment-related mortality 2
  • Grade 3-4 irAEs require immediate corticosteroid therapy and temporary or permanent discontinuation of serplulimab depending on severity 2

Predictive and Prognostic Biomarkers

Molecular Predictors of Response

  • A 15-protein signature constructed from differentially expressed proteins was associated with significantly longer OS and PFS in serplulimab-treated patients 5
  • Patients harboring RB1 mutations or mutations in Notch pathway genes showed improved ORR, OS, or PFS compared to wild-type counterparts 5
  • These biomarkers may help identify patients most likely to benefit from serplulimab therapy 5

Prognostic Factors

  • Baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level were independent prognosticators in ES-SCLC patients 5
  • These hematological parameters can help stratify patients and inform treatment decisions 5

Pharmacokinetics and Dosing

  • Pharmacokinetic data demonstrate minimal accumulation of serplulimab after repeated administration 3
  • Functional PD-1 blockade was observed across all dose levels tested (0.3,1.0,3.0, and 10.0 mg/kg) 3
  • The maximum tolerated dose was not reached in phase I studies, supporting the safety of the approved dosing regimens 3

Clinical Positioning and Comparative Effectiveness

Comparison to Other Immunotherapies in ES-SCLC

While ASCO guidelines recommend durvalumab or atezolizumab as standard first-line options for ES-SCLC 1, serplulimab demonstrates:

  • Numerically superior median OS (15.4 months) compared to durvalumab (12.9 months in CASPIAN) and atezolizumab (12.3 months in IMpower133) 1, 4
  • More pronounced PFS benefit (HR 0.48) compared to durvalumab (HR 0.78) and atezolizumab (HR 0.77) 1, 4
  • Meta-analyses show no significant difference between anti-PD-L1 and anti-PD-1 agents overall, but serplulimab's results are particularly robust 1

Important Caveats

  • The ASTRUM-005 trial was conducted primarily in China, and generalizability to other populations requires confirmation 4
  • Serplulimab is not yet widely approved outside of China, limiting its availability 4
  • Direct head-to-head comparisons with other PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are lacking 1

Common Pitfalls and Clinical Pearls

  • Do not use serplulimab in patients with severe autoimmune disease or organ transplantation, as these are contraindications to immunotherapy 1
  • Monitor closely for pneumonitis, particularly in the first 3-6 months of treatment, as this is the most serious potentially fatal irAE 6, 8
  • Consider baseline NLR and LDH levels to help prognosticate outcomes and counsel patients appropriately 5
  • Test for RB1 and Notch pathway mutations if available, as these may predict enhanced benefit from serplulimab 5
  • In MSI-H/dMMR colorectal cancer, serplulimab represents one of several effective PD-1 inhibitor options, with choice often determined by availability and institutional preference 1, 6

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.