What is the adjuvant treatment of choice for a patient with triple-negative breast cancer (BC) and high Ki67 (Ki67+) expression, who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and achieved a successful surgery with R0 resection, but not a pathological complete response (pCR)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: March 31, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

For a patient with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) with high Ki67 (80%) who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy without achieving pathologic complete response (pCR) but had successful R0 resection, capecitabine is the adjuvant treatment of choice. The recommended regimen is capecitabine 1,000-1,250 mg/m² twice daily on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle for a total of 6-8 cycles (approximately 6 months of therapy) 1. This recommendation is based on evidence showing that adjuvant capecitabine improves disease-free survival and overall survival specifically in TNBC patients who have residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.58 for disease-free survival and 0.52 for overall survival 1. The high Ki67 percentage (80%) indicates a highly proliferative tumor, further supporting the need for additional systemic therapy. Some key points to consider when using capecitabine include:

  • Common side effects include hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea, and fatigue, which should be monitored closely 1
  • Dose modifications may be necessary based on toxicity
  • Regular follow-up every 3 months during treatment is recommended to assess response and manage side effects. It's worth noting that the CREATE-X trial, which demonstrated the efficacy of capecitabine in this setting, had a median follow-up of 3.6 years, providing a reasonable duration of follow-up to assess the treatment's effectiveness 1.

From the Research

Adjuvant Therapy for Triple Negative Breast Cancer

The patient in question has triple negative breast cancer with a Ki67 score of 80%, indicating a high level of proliferation. Despite receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, a pathological complete response (pCR) was not achieved, but surgery was successful with R0 resection.

Factors Influencing Adjuvant Therapy Choice

  • The patient's high Ki67 score suggests an aggressive tumor, which may benefit from adjuvant therapy 2, 3, 4.
  • The lack of pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy may indicate a poorer prognosis, making adjuvant therapy more crucial 3, 5.
  • The patient's triple negative status means that hormone therapy and HER2-targeted therapy are not options, leaving chemotherapy as the primary adjuvant therapy choice 2, 6.

Adjuvant Therapy Options

  • Chemotherapy remains the basis of treatment for triple negative breast cancer, with anthracycline-based and 5-fluorouracil-based regimens being common options 2, 6.
  • The choice of adjuvant chemotherapy regimen may depend on factors such as the patient's overall health, tumor characteristics, and potential side effects 6.
  • Other adjuvant therapy options, such as PARP inhibitors and immunotherapy, may be considered for patients with specific molecular characteristics, such as BRCA mutations or high PD-L1 expression 6.

Conclusion Not Provided as per Request

References Not Provided as per Request

Instead, the information is provided in the following points:

  • The patient's high Ki67 score and lack of pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy may be beneficial 2, 3, 4.
  • The choice of adjuvant chemotherapy regimen should be individualized based on the patient's specific characteristics and tumor biology 6.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.