What is the procedure for a Neostigmine (acetylcholinesterase inhibitor) challenge test in diagnosing Myasthenia Gravis (MG)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 17, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Neostigmine Challenge Test Procedure in Myasthenia Gravis

Administer neostigmine 0.5 mg intramuscularly and assess clinical response at 30-45 minutes, with atropine immediately available to counteract potential muscarinic side effects including bradycardia, bronchospasm, and excessive salivation. 1, 2

Pre-Test Preparation

  • Ensure atropine is drawn up and immediately available before administering neostigmine, as muscarinic side effects (excess tearing, salivation, sweating, abdominal cramping, bradycardia, bronchospasm, hypotension) can occur 3
  • Perform baseline clinical assessment using objective measures such as ptosis measurement, extraocular movement range, or limb strength testing 2
  • Consider baseline neurophysiological testing with CN-SFEMG if available for more objective documentation 2
  • The test should be performed in a monitored setting by practitioners experienced with proper administration 3

Administration Protocol

  • Administer neostigmine 0.5 mg intramuscularly 1, 2
  • Alternative intranasal route: 2-4 puffs (one puff = 4.6 mg) can provide faster onset within 3 minutes, peaking at 18-33 minutes 4
  • The intramuscular route is standard for diagnostic testing, while intranasal may be useful when rapid effect is needed 5, 4

Assessment Timeline and Response Evaluation

  • Peak clinical response occurs at 30-45 minutes post-injection for intramuscular administration 2
  • For intranasal administration, effect is evident within 3 minutes and peaks at 18-33 minutes 4
  • Document improvement in specific clinical parameters:
    • Reduction in ptosis (measure in millimeters) 3
    • Improvement in extraocular movements and diplopia 3
    • Increased limb strength 2
    • Improvement in bulbar symptoms if present 5

Interpreting Test Results

  • The neostigmine test demonstrates 93.4% positivity in ocular myasthenia and 97.92% positivity in generalized myasthenia, making it more sensitive than anti-AChR antibodies (57.36% and 93.77% respectively) or repetitive nerve stimulation (51.78% and 82.35% respectively) 1
  • A positive test shows clear clinical improvement in weakness, ptosis, or diplopia within the expected timeframe 1, 2
  • CN-SFEMG recordings, if performed, will show significant improvement in mean consecutive differences, single-pair jitter, and blocks even when clinical improvement is subtle 2

Critical Safety Considerations

  • Monitor for muscarinic side effects throughout the test period, particularly bradycardia and bronchospasm 3
  • Have atropine ready for immediate administration if severe muscarinic effects occur 3
  • Avoid this test in patients currently taking cholinesterase inhibitors like pyridostigmine, as they already have reduced plasma cholinesterase activity and are at risk for prolonged effects 3
  • If the patient is on pyridostigmine, consider holding the morning dose before testing or use the edrophonium (Tensilon) test instead, which has a shorter duration of action 3

Comparison to Edrophonium (Tensilon) Test

The neostigmine test offers advantages over edrophonium testing in certain contexts:

  • Longer duration of action allows for more thorough clinical assessment 2
  • Higher sensitivity, particularly in ocular myasthenia (93.4% vs 86% for edrophonium) 3, 1
  • However, edrophonium has faster onset (seconds to minutes) and shorter duration, making it preferable when rapid confirmation is needed 3

Post-Test Management

  • Effects last 1-2 hours for intramuscular administration and over 2 hours for intranasal administration 4, 2
  • Document all clinical changes objectively using standardized scales like the MG Composite (MGC) scale when possible 2
  • A positive test supports the diagnosis but should be confirmed with anti-AChR antibodies, anti-MuSK antibodies if seronegative, and electrodiagnostic studies 6, 7

References

Research

Clinical and CN-SFEMG evaluation of neostigmine test in myasthenia gravis.

Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2018

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Criteria and Treatment Options for Myasthenia Gravis (MG)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Laboratory Testing for Myasthenia Gravis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.