p16 Positive Carcinoma of Unknown Primary (CUP)
p16-positive CUP represents a favorable-prognosis subset of cancer of unknown primary, most commonly indicating an HPV-associated squamous cell carcinoma with an occult oropharyngeal primary, and should be treated with neck dissection and/or radiotherapy-chemotherapy analogous to head and neck squamous cell carcinoma rather than empiric CUP regimens. 1
Definition and Clinical Significance
p16-positive CUP is defined as squamous cell carcinoma presenting in non-supraclavicular cervical lymph nodes without a detectable mucosal primary tumor, where immunohistochemistry demonstrates p16 overexpression. 1 This represents approximately 63% of head and neck CUP cases and constitutes one of the favorable-prognosis CUP subtypes (comprising 15-20% of all CUP patients). 1, 2
Biological and Prognostic Implications
Primary tumor localization: p16 positivity strongly predicts an occult oropharyngeal primary, particularly in the tonsils or base of tongue, as HPV-associated malignancies preferentially arise in these locations. 3, 4
Superior survival outcomes: Patients with p16-positive CUP demonstrate significantly improved 5-year overall survival (69% vs 33% for p16-negative; p=0.045) and 3-year disease-free survival (79% vs 56%; p=0.012) compared to p16-negative disease. 3, 2
Less aggressive nodal disease: p16-positive tumors present with less advanced nodal status (N1-N2b in 52% vs 89% for p16-negative; p=0.035), allowing for potentially less intensive treatment approaches. 2
Diagnostic Workup Algorithm
Mandatory Initial Assessment
When squamous cell carcinoma is identified in cervical lymph nodes:
Perform flexible endoscopy, contrast-enhanced CT and/or preferably MRI of the head and neck, plus FDG-PET imaging to locate the primary. 1
If primary remains undetected, proceed to panendoscopy with directed biopsies of the nasopharynx, hypopharynx, and oropharynx, plus bilateral tonsillectomy. 1
Test carcinoma tissue for p16 expression by immunohistochemistry, and if positive, confirm HPV status. 1
Determine Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) status and consider PD-L1 expression analysis for relapsed or metastatic disease. 1
Prognostic Refinement
While p16 positivity alone indicates favorable prognosis, combining p16 status with Ki-67 proliferation index may provide more accurate prediction of locoregional control—all p16-positive patients with low Ki-67 demonstrated excellent locoregional control in clinical series. 5 However, this combination is not yet incorporated into standard guidelines.
Treatment Recommendations
Localized Disease (Non-Distant Metastatic)
Treatment should mirror head and neck squamous cell carcinoma protocols, NOT standard empiric CUP chemotherapy regimens. 1
For small-volume neck disease (N1-N2b):
- Choose either neck dissection OR radiotherapy-chemotherapy (RT-ChT) as single modality treatment. 1
For large-volume neck disease (≥N2c):
- Combine both neck dissection AND radiotherapy-chemotherapy. 1
Metastatic/Relapsed Disease
For patients with distant metastases or relapsed disease, emerging evidence supports immunotherapy-based approaches:
Pembrolizumab plus 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin demonstrated remarkable efficacy in a case report of p16-positive squamous cell CUP with widespread metastases, achieving marked tumor reduction after just two cycles. 6
This combination should be strongly considered for p16-positive CUP with unfavorable features (distant metastases, poor performance status), particularly given the established role of PD-L1 inhibitors in HPV-associated head and neck cancers. 6
Critical Clinical Pitfalls
Common Errors to Avoid
Treating p16-positive CUP with empiric platinum-doublet regimens (carboplatin-paclitaxel, cisplatin-gemcitabine) used for unfavorable CUP—this ignores the favorable biology and site-specific treatment opportunities. 1
Failing to perform bilateral tonsillectomy during panendoscopy—this is essential as occult tonsillar primaries are frequently identified only on pathologic examination. 1
Assuming all p16-positive patients have identical outcomes—age remains an independent prognostic factor, and nodal burden still influences treatment intensity decisions. 5, 2
Omitting p16 testing in cervical squamous cell carcinoma—this biomarker fundamentally changes treatment approach and prognostic counseling. 1
Nuanced Considerations
The 2023 ESMO guidelines represent the most current evidence-based approach, superseding older recommendations from 2007-2015 that did not fully incorporate p16/HPV biology into treatment algorithms. 1 While earlier guidelines mentioned p16 testing, they did not explicitly stratify treatment intensity based on p16 status as strongly as current practice supports. 1
There is no definitive consensus on whether surgery or radiotherapy should be preferred for local treatment when both are options, though breast radiotherapy data in other CUP subtypes suggests RT may spare patients from surgery with equivalent outcomes—this principle may apply to neck disease as well. 1