What is the probability score for diagnosing Inclusion Body Myositis (IBM) using the 2017 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 17, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Probability Scoring for Inclusion Body Myositis Using 2017 EULAR/ACR Criteria

The 2017 EULAR/ACR criteria use a two-step probability-based scoring system: first, patients must achieve ≥55% probability of having idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) with a score ≥5.5 without biopsy or ≥6.7 with biopsy, then IBM is sub-classified using a classification tree if finger flexor weakness with lack of treatment response OR muscle biopsy showing rimmed vacuoles is present. 1, 2

Step 1: Initial IIM Classification Probability Thresholds

The EULAR/ACR criteria establish three probability categories for IIM classification before subtyping to IBM 1:

  • "Possible IIM": Probability ≥50% and <55%

    • Score ≥5.3 without biopsy
    • Score ≥6.5 with biopsy 1
  • "Probable IIM": Probability 55-90% (recommended minimum cutoff)

    • Score ≥5.5 and <7.5 without biopsy
    • Score ≥6.7 and <8.7 with biopsy 1
  • "Definite IIM": Probability ≥90%

    • Score ≥7.5 without biopsy
    • Score ≥8.7 with biopsy 1

Step 2: IBM Sub-Classification After Meeting IIM Threshold

Once a patient meets the ≥55% probability threshold for IIM, they can be sub-classified as IBM using the classification tree if one of the following is present 1, 2:

  • Finger flexor weakness AND lack of response to immunosuppressive treatment, OR
  • Muscle biopsy demonstrating rimmed vacuoles 1, 2

Performance Characteristics for IBM

The EULAR/ACR criteria demonstrate superior performance for IBM compared to older criteria 3:

  • Sensitivity for IBM: 98% 3
  • Specificity for IBM: >98% 3
  • The criteria correctly identified IBM with 92% agreement with physician diagnosis at the 55% probability cutoff, increasing to 93% agreement at the 90% probability cutoff 1

Clinical Context and Pitfalls

Critical diagnostic consideration: The older Bohan and Peter criteria frequently misclassify IBM patients as polymyositis, which is why these probability-based EULAR/ACR criteria were developed 2. IBM should be suspected in any adult patient presenting with chronic polymyositis unresponsive to immunosuppressive therapy 2.

The typical IBM patient profile includes 4, 5:

  • Age at onset usually ≥40 years (mean 47 years) 2
  • Insidious onset with painless weakness 4
  • Early and often asymmetrical weakness of quadriceps and finger flexors 5
  • Normal or mildly elevated creatine kinase 4

Important caveat: Up to 14% of IBM patients may present atypically (dysphagia, asymptomatic hyperCKemia, foot drop), with median time from symptom onset to diagnosis of 9 years 6. Clinical examination is often the key to diagnosis, as any given biopsy may lack characteristic histopathological abnormalities 5, 7. Adherence to strict histopathological criteria will exclude large numbers of patients with IBM who may be at earlier disease stages 7.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

ECMA Diagnostic Guidelines for Inclusion Body Myositis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Inclusion body myositis. Observations in 40 patients.

Brain : a journal of neurology, 1989

Research

Inclusion body myositis: old and new concepts.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2009

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.