Is strontium ranelate effective for treating osteoporosis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 17, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Strontium Ranelate for Osteoporosis

Strontium ranelate is an effective treatment option for postmenopausal osteoporosis that reduces both vertebral and non-vertebral fractures, but it should be considered a second-line or alternative therapy after bisphosphonates, particularly in patients who cannot tolerate or have failed first-line treatments. 1

Evidence for Efficacy

Vertebral Fracture Reduction

  • Strontium ranelate 2 g daily reduces vertebral fracture risk by 41% over 3 years in postmenopausal women with prevalent vertebral fractures (P < 0.001). 2
  • Early efficacy is demonstrated with a 49% reduction in new vertebral fractures after just 1 year of treatment (P < 0.001). 2
  • In women without prevalent vertebral fractures, strontium ranelate reduces vertebral fracture risk by 45% over 3 years (P < 0.001). 2
  • Clinical vertebral fractures are reduced by 38% over 3 years (P < 0.001). 2

Non-Vertebral and Hip Fracture Reduction

  • In the general osteoporotic population, strontium ranelate reduces all non-vertebral fractures by 16% (P = 0.04) and major fragility fractures by 19% (P = 0.031) over 3 years. 3
  • In high-risk patients (age ≥74 years with femoral neck T-score ≤-3), hip fracture risk is reduced by 36% (P = 0.046). 3
  • A Cochrane review confirmed a 37% reduction in vertebral fractures (RR 0.63,95% CI 0.56-0.71) and 14% reduction in non-vertebral fractures (RR 0.86,95% CI 0.75-0.98) with 2 g daily. 4

Bone Mineral Density Effects

  • Strontium ranelate increases lumbar spine BMD by approximately 3% annually and femoral neck BMD by 8.2% at 3 years (P < 0.001). 5, 3
  • Total hip BMD increases by 9.8% at 3 years (P < 0.001). 3

Position in Treatment Algorithm

Current Guideline Recommendations

  • The 2022 ACR guideline for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis lists strontium ranelate as a treatment option for patients who are unable to tolerate alendronate or risedronate, requiring specialist referral. 1
  • The 2023 ACP guideline does not specifically recommend strontium ranelate as a first-line option, prioritizing bisphosphonates instead. 1
  • European guidelines from 2013 support the use of strontium salts with Level 2a evidence, Grade B recommendation for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. 1

Appropriate Patient Selection

  • Consider strontium ranelate for postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis who cannot tolerate oral bisphosphonates due to gastrointestinal side effects. 1
  • Use in patients requiring alternatives to bisphosphonates, particularly those with contraindications to oral bisphosphonates (such as esophageal disorders or concerns about varices). 1
  • For patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, strontium ranelate is recommended to prevent additional symptomatic fractures. 6

Safety Profile and Important Caveats

Common Adverse Effects

  • Diarrhea is the most common side effect, occurring more frequently than placebo, though it does not significantly increase treatment discontinuation rates. 4
  • Adverse event rates overall are similar to placebo in clinical trials. 5, 2, 3

Serious Safety Concerns

  • Strontium ranelate increases the risk of venous thromboembolism by approximately 50%, including pulmonary embolism. 7
  • Increased serum creatine kinase activity occurs in 30% of patients. 7
  • Recent data show increased cardiovascular risk with strontium ranelate, which has led to restricted use in some regions. 1
  • Potential neurological and muscular adverse effects require monitoring, though these were inadequately documented in trials. 7

Long-Term Safety Unknowns

  • The long-term effects on bone quality (osteomalacia, pathological fractures) remain unknown, particularly concerning given historical issues with high-dose strontium use in the 1950s causing bone mineralization disorders. 7
  • Data from dialysis patients raise concerns about potential bone toxicity with prolonged use. 7

Dosing and Administration

Standard Dosing

  • The effective dose is 2 g daily orally for treatment of established osteoporosis. 5, 2, 3
  • Lower doses (0.5 g, 1 g) show inferior efficacy compared to 2 g daily. 4, 5
  • All patients should receive concurrent calcium and vitamin D supplementation. 5, 3

Duration of Treatment

  • Efficacy is demonstrated over 3 years of continuous treatment. 2, 3
  • Early benefits appear within the first year of treatment. 2

Mechanism of Action

  • Strontium ranelate has a unique dual mode of action: it increases bone formation by stimulating osteoblast activity while simultaneously decreasing bone resorption by inhibiting osteoclast activity. 5, 2
  • This rebalances bone turnover in favor of bone formation, distinguishing it from pure antiresorptive agents like bisphosphonates. 5

Clinical Bottom Line

Strontium ranelate is an effective alternative for postmenopausal osteoporosis with proven vertebral and non-vertebral fracture reduction, but cardiovascular and thromboembolic risks limit its use to patients who cannot tolerate or have failed bisphosphonates. 1, 7 The 2 g daily dose should be used with calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and patients require monitoring for venous thromboembolism and cardiovascular events. 7, 4 Given the superior safety profile and more extensive evidence base for bisphosphonates, strontium ranelate should be reserved for second-line therapy after specialist consultation. 1

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.