Management of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in Low Socioeconomic Status Patients
Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) should be the first-line treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding in patients with low socioeconomic status, as they are effective, affordable, and address the most common causes while reducing anemia risk.
Important Clarification
The provided evidence does not contain studies specifically examining the association between low socioeconomic status and AUB. However, I can provide evidence-based recommendations for initial AUB management that are particularly relevant for resource-limited settings.
Initial Assessment Priorities
When evaluating AUB in any patient, immediately assess for:
- Hemodynamic stability and acute blood loss requiring urgent intervention 1
- Age-related cancer risk: endometrial biopsy is mandatory for all women >45 years or those with postmenopausal bleeding 1
- Specific cancer risk factors in younger women (obesity, chronic anovulation, diabetes) that warrant endometrial biopsy even if <45 years 1
- Anemia presence and severity, as this directly impacts treatment urgency and modality selection 2, 3
First-Line Medical Management
Hormonal treatment with combined oral contraceptive pills is the optimal initial approach because:
- COCs demonstrate superior treatment outcomes with an odds ratio of 2.15 (p < 0.001) for improved response 3
- They significantly reduce anemia prevalence (p = 0.042), which is critical in resource-limited settings where iron supplementation may be less accessible 3
- COCs are cost-effective and widely available, making them ideal for low socioeconomic populations 2
- They address the most common cause of AUB: ovulatory dysfunction (31.6% of cases), which itself predicts better treatment response (OR = 1.75, p = 0.003) 3
Alternative Medical Options
If COCs are contraindicated or not tolerated, use this hierarchy:
- Tranexamic acid (antifibrinolytic agent) for heavy menstrual bleeding 2, 1
- NSAIDs for pain and bleeding reduction 2, 1
- Progestin-only therapy (oral progestogens or levonorgestrel-releasing IUD) 2, 1
The levonorgestrel IUD, while requiring higher upfront cost, may be cost-effective long-term in low socioeconomic populations due to its 5-year duration 2.
Patient-Specific Considerations
Age impacts treatment response (OR = 0.95, p = 0.015), with younger patients responding better to medical management 3. Since the most common age group presenting with AUB is 20-29 years (43%), medical management is particularly appropriate 3.
BMI significantly affects outcomes (OR = 1.10, p = 0.005), and 64.2% of AUB patients are overweight or obese 3. Weight counseling should accompany treatment, as obesity itself is a risk factor requiring endometrial assessment.
When Medical Management Fails
Structural lesions require different approaches:
- Leiomyomas decrease medical treatment success (OR = 0.55, p = 0.007) and may necessitate surgical intervention 3
- Surgical procedures should be reserved for patients with identified structural pathology (polyps, adenomyosis, leiomyomas) who fail medical management 1
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Never assume benign etiology in women >45 years without endometrial sampling, regardless of socioeconomic status 1
- Do not overlook systemic causes: thyroid disease, coagulopathies (especially von Willebrand disease), diabetes, and medications (corticosteroids, antipsychotics, antiepileptics) all contribute to AUB 4
- Mental health screening is essential: 50% of AUB patients have anxiety or depression, which impacts treatment adherence and quality of life 4
Practical Algorithm for Low-Resource Settings
- Rule out pregnancy and acute hemorrhage requiring hospitalization
- Perform endometrial biopsy if age >45 years or cancer risk factors present
- Check hemoglobin/hematocrit for anemia
- Initiate COCs as first-line unless contraindicated
- Reassess at 3 months; if no improvement, consider tranexamic acid or NSAIDs as adjuncts
- Reserve imaging (ultrasound) and surgical referral for treatment failures or suspected structural pathology