What is the Candida score?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

What is the Candida Score?

The Candida score is a clinical prediction tool developed to identify critically ill patients at high risk for invasive candidiasis by combining clinical risk factors with colonization status, using a point-based system where a cutoff value ≥3 indicates patients who may benefit from empirical antifungal therapy. 1

Score Components and Calculation

The Candida score assigns points based on the following risk factors 1:

  • Surgery (recent major surgery, particularly abdominal): 1 point
  • Multifocal Candida colonization: 1 point
  • Total parenteral nutrition (TPN): 1 point
  • Severe sepsis/clinical sepsis: 2 points

The total score ranges from 0 to 5 points, with a cutoff value of ≥2.5 (typically rounded to ≥3 in clinical practice) demonstrating sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 74% for predicting invasive candidiasis. 1

Clinical Performance and Validation

The score was originally developed in 2006 by a Spanish group using the Estudio de Prevalencia de CANdidiasis database, with subsequent validation in 2009 demonstrating a significant linear association between increasing score values and rates of invasive Candida infections 1.

Prospective validation studies have confirmed that patients with scores ≤3 have extremely low rates of invasive candidiasis (0%), while those with scores of 4 or 5 have substantially higher rates (17.6% and 50%, respectively). 2

Key Performance Characteristics:

  • Negative predictive value: 84-96% across validation studies 3
  • Positive predictive value: 25-47% (relatively poor) 3
  • Area under ROC curve: 0.66-0.72 in external validation studies 3, 4

Clinical Application and Limitations

The Candida score is most useful for ruling out invasive candidiasis rather than confirming it, given its high negative predictive value but poor positive predictive value. 3 This makes it particularly valuable for identifying patients who do not require empirical antifungal therapy, thereby avoiding unnecessary antifungal use and associated costs 1.

Important Caveats:

  • The score has high specificity but low sensitivity, meaning it may miss some patients with invasive candidiasis 1
  • Performance may be limited in certain populations, including COVID-19 patients where one study found no difference in Candida scores between those with and without candidemia 1
  • The score performs better when combined with biomarkers such as β-D-glucan (BDG), with one study showing that an integrated strategy using both Candida score >3 and BDG helped optimize antifungal therapy decisions without increasing mortality 1

Target Population

The Candida score is specifically designed for non-neutropenic critically ill patients in the ICU setting, particularly those with hospital-acquired severe sepsis or septic shock. 2 It is not validated for neutropenic patients or those outside the ICU environment 5.

Risk Stratification:

  • Score 0-2: Low risk - invasive candidiasis highly improbable 2
  • Score 3-4: Moderate risk - consider additional diagnostic testing 4
  • Score ≥5: High risk - strong consideration for empirical antifungal therapy 2

Integration with Other Diagnostic Approaches

While the Candida score provides clinical guidance, it should ideally be combined with non-culture diagnostic methods such as β-D-glucan testing (sensitivity 56-93%, specificity 71-100%) or mannan/anti-mannan antibody assays (combined sensitivity 83%, specificity 86%) to improve diagnostic accuracy 1. Blood cultures remain the gold standard but are negative in up to 50% of invasive candidiasis cases, highlighting the need for complementary diagnostic strategies 1.

The score has been superseded by newer prediction models in some contexts, with one recent study developing a risk score incorporating CD8+ T-cell counts that demonstrated superior performance (AUROC 0.820 versus 0.711 for Candida score alone) 4.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.