What are the causes of axillary adenopathy with uptake on a Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scan?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Causes of Axillary Adenopathy with FDG Uptake on PET-CT

Axillary adenopathy with FDG uptake on PET-CT has a broad differential diagnosis that includes both benign and malignant etiologies, with the most common causes being metastatic breast cancer, lymphoma/leukemia, reactive lymphadenopathy from infectious or inflammatory processes, and less commonly, metastases from non-mammary malignancies. 1

Malignant Causes

Primary Breast Cancer and Metastases

  • Metastatic breast cancer is the most common malignant cause of axillary adenopathy with FDG uptake, though less than 1% of breast cancers initially present as isolated axillary adenopathy. 1
  • FDG-PET/CT demonstrates high specificity (90-100%) but variable sensitivity (48-87%) for detecting axillary lymph node metastases from breast cancer. 1
  • Higher maximum standardized uptake value (SUV max) of axillary nodes may predict metastatic disease, though this finding is not universally reliable. 1
  • When incidental axillary FDG uptake is detected on PET/CT, further evaluation with mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and ultrasound is required, followed by possible image-guided biopsy. 1

Hematologic Malignancies

  • Lymphoma and leukemia are the most common non-mammary malignancies causing bilateral axillary adenopathy with FDG uptake. 1
  • These systemic malignancies typically present with adenopathy in multiple nodal stations beyond just the axilla. 1

Metastases from Other Primary Sites

  • Metastatic melanoma can present as FDG-avid axillary adenopathy, sometimes without an identifiable primary lesion. 2
  • Other non-mammary malignancies can metastasize to axillary nodes, though this is less common. 1

Benign Causes

Reactive/Inflammatory Adenopathy

  • Benign reactive lymphadenopathy from infectious and inflammatory processes is a common cause of FDG-avid axillary nodes. 1
  • Infectious etiologies include mastitis, granulomas, and skin wound infections. 1, 3
  • Autoimmune diseases can also cause reactive axillary adenopathy with FDG uptake. 1

Post-Vaccination Adenopathy

  • COVID-19 vaccination causes ipsilateral axillary and cervical lymphadenopathy with FDG uptake that can persist for weeks to months after vaccination. 2, 4
  • This vaccine-related adenopathy can be indistinguishable from nodal metastasis on imaging, creating a diagnostic challenge in oncology patients. 4
  • Critical pitfall: Do not automatically attribute all axillary adenopathy to recent vaccination, as true malignancy can coexist or present shortly after vaccination. 2

Silicone-Related Adenopathy

  • Silicone adenitis from breast implant leakage can cause hypermetabolic axillary lymph nodes that mimic metastatic disease on FDG-PET/CT. 5
  • This is an important false-positive cause to consider in patients with a history of silicone breast implants. 5

Diagnostic Approach Algorithm

Initial Evaluation

  • Axillary ultrasound is the primary modality of choice for initial evaluation, as it can determine if nodes are solid or cystic and assess morphologic features. 3
  • Ultrasound-guided biopsy should be performed for suspicious nodes, providing definitive diagnosis with high specificity (98-100%). 3

Complementary Imaging

  • Diagnostic mammography and/or digital breast tomosynthesis should complement axillary ultrasound to evaluate for potential breast primary lesions. 3
  • If occult breast cancer is suspected with negative mammography, breast MRI can identify the primary lesion in approximately 70% of cases. 3

Staging for Confirmed Malignancy

  • For confirmed breast cancer metastasis, complete breast imaging workup with MRI is recommended. 3
  • For lymphoma or other non-breast malignancies, CT chest/abdomen/pelvis or PET/CT is appropriate for staging. 3

Important Clinical Caveats

  • FDG uptake by an axillary node does not always represent true metastatic disease, as multiple benign causes exist. 1
  • The SUV of the primary breast tumor cannot reliably predict axillary metastases, despite higher values often being associated with nodal spread. 6
  • In patients with very low probability of axillary metastases (T1a tumors), the role of PET/CT should be carefully considered given radiation exposure and cost. 6
  • Always obtain vaccination history, as post-vaccination adenopathy is increasingly common but should not lead to under-diagnosis of true malignancy. 2, 4
  • Clinical context is essential, as the majority of enlarged lymph nodes have benign reactive changes. 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Evaluation of Enlarged Left Axillary Lymph Nodes

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

False-Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes Due to Silicone Adenitis on (18)F-FDG PET/CT in an Oncological Setting.

Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2016

Research

Prospective evaluation of fluorine-18-FDG PET in presurgical staging of the axilla in breast cancer.

Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 1998

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.