What is the management approach for a patient with an ejection fraction (EF) of 65-70 percent?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Ejection Fraction 65-70%

An ejection fraction of 65-70% is normal and requires no specific cardiac intervention based on the EF value alone; management should focus entirely on the underlying cardiac condition (if any) and associated symptoms rather than the EF itself.

Understanding Normal Ejection Fraction

  • EF 65-70% represents preserved left ventricular systolic function and falls well within the normal range (normal EF is typically >50-55%) 1, 2, 3
  • This EF range indicates the heart is ejecting blood efficiently with no evidence of systolic dysfunction 4
  • No cardiac medications or interventions are indicated based solely on this normal EF value 1, 3

Clinical Context Determines Management

The management approach depends entirely on what cardiac condition (if any) is present alongside this normal EF:

If Mitral Regurgitation is Present

  • In chronic severe primary MR with EF 65-70%, the patient may still be symptomatic (dyspnea, fatigue) despite the preserved EF because MR creates volume overload and pulmonary congestion independent of systolic function 5
  • The regurgitant flow increases left atrial pressure leading to pulmonary venous congestion even when LVEF remains normal 5
  • Mitral valve surgery is indicated (Class I recommendation) if the patient is symptomatic with severe MR, regardless of the normal EF 6, 5
  • For asymptomatic severe MR with EF 65-70%, surgery is reasonable if there is new-onset atrial fibrillation or pulmonary hypertension (PASP >50 mmHg) 6
  • In MR, an EF of 65-70% may actually mask early myocardial dysfunction since the reduced afterload from regurgitation artificially elevates the EF; ideally EF should be >64% in severe MR 6, 5
  • Serial echocardiography every 6-12 months is recommended for asymptomatic severe MR to monitor for progressive LV enlargement or declining EF 6

If Aortic Stenosis is Present

  • With severe AS, an EF of 65-70% indicates preserved LV systolic function and appropriate compensatory hypertrophy 6
  • The hypertrophic response has adequately countered the pressure overload, maintaining normal wall stress and EF 6
  • Aortic valve replacement is indicated based on symptoms (dyspnea, angina, syncope), NOT the EF value 6
  • Asymptomatic severe AS with this normal EF requires close monitoring but not immediate intervention 6

If Heart Failure Symptoms are Present

  • Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) should be considered if the patient has dyspnea, fatigue, or exercise intolerance despite EF 65-70% 1, 2, 3
  • The pathophysiology involves diastolic dysfunction (impaired LV relaxation and increased stiffness) rather than systolic dysfunction 1, 2
  • Management focuses on controlling hypertension, reducing LV filling pressures with diuretics, and treating ischemia 1
  • Calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and aldosterone antagonists are recommended for blood pressure control and potential improvement in LV relaxation 1
  • Beta-blockers are indicated if there is atrial fibrillation for rate control or if ischemic heart disease is present 1

If Cirrhosis with Ascites is Present

  • Patients with cirrhosis typically have hyperdynamic circulation with EF usually >70-75% 6
  • An EF of 65-70% in a cirrhotic patient may actually represent relative cardiac dysfunction 6
  • For TIPS consideration, an EF >60% is more appropriate as an inclusion criterion since patients with EF 50-60% have higher risk of post-TIPS heart failure and reduced survival 6
  • Patients with EF 65-70% and diastolic dysfunction should be carefully evaluated before TIPS placement 6

Key Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not assume normal EF means absence of cardiac disease or symptoms - many conditions cause symptoms despite preserved systolic function 5, 1, 2
  • In MR, do not wait for EF to decline below 60% before considering surgery as this represents established LV dysfunction; progressive decline toward 60% warrants intervention 6, 5
  • Do not use EF alone to guide management - integrate clinical symptoms, valve pathology, chamber dimensions, and pulmonary pressures 6
  • In HFpEF, recognize that "normal" EF does not exclude heart failure - diastolic dysfunction is the primary mechanism 1, 2, 3

Monitoring Recommendations

  • For asymptomatic severe valvular disease with EF 65-70%, perform echocardiography every 6-12 months to detect early LV dysfunction or chamber enlargement 6
  • Monitor for development of symptoms, new atrial fibrillation, or pulmonary hypertension which would change management 6
  • Serial assessment of LV end-systolic dimension is important - LVESD approaching 40 mm warrants consideration of intervention even with preserved EF 6

References

Research

Treatment of heart failure with normal ejection fraction.

Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2011

Research

Heart failure with a normal left ventricular ejection fraction: diastolic heart failure.

Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association, 2008

Guideline

Mitral Regurgitation and Dyspnea

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.