What study investigated the relationship between Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) and high-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) and showed poor outcomes in patients with high hsCRP and high LDL, as well as those with high hsCRP and low LDL?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

The JUPITER Study: High CRP Predicts Risk Regardless of LDL Level

You are asking about the JUPITER trial (Justification for the Use of statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin), which demonstrated that patients with elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP ≥2 mg/L) experienced significant cardiovascular events even when LDL cholesterol was low (<130 mg/dL), and that both groups—those with high CRP/high LDL and high CRP/low LDL—had poor outcomes. 1, 2

Key Findings from JUPITER

The JUPITER study enrolled apparently healthy individuals without dyslipidemia but with hsCRP ≥2 mg/L, demonstrating that this population had a cardiovascular disease event rate of approximately 1.36% per year in the placebo group despite having LDL cholesterol <130 mg/dL. 1, 2

The critical insight was that elevated inflammation (hsCRP ≥2 mg/L) identified high-risk patients independent of their LDL cholesterol levels, challenging the traditional paradigm that focused solely on lipid parameters. 2

Validation in Real-World Populations

The ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) study validated JUPITER's findings by examining 8,907 age-eligible participants stratified by both LDL-C and hsCRP levels:

  • 18.2% of participants were "JUPITER-eligible" (hsCRP ≥2.0 mg/L with LDL-C <130 mg/dL) and had an absolute CVD risk of 10.9% over 6.9 years (1.57% per year). 2

  • Patients with elevated hsCRP and low LDL had a CVD event rate of 1.57% per year over 6.9 years, remarkably similar to the JUPITER placebo group's 1.36% per year rate. 2

  • The association of hsCRP ≥2.0 mg/L with increased CVD risk and mortality occurred regardless of LDL-C level, providing a simple method using age and hsCRP for identifying higher-risk individuals. 2

The Four-Quadrant Analysis

More recent research has examined outcomes based on concurrent LDL-C and hsCRP stratification, revealing important interactions:

  • In patients with stable coronary heart disease, 42.7% had elevated hsCRP ≥2 mg/L, and among those with well-controlled LDL <70 mg/dL, 30.9% still had elevated hsCRP indicating residual inflammatory risk. 3

  • When examining lipoprotein(a) as an additional risk factor in PCI patients, elevated Lp(a) ≥30 mg/dL was independently associated with higher all-cause death only when both LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL AND hsCRP ≥2 mg/L were present (HR: 1.488,95% CI: 1.059-2.092). 4

  • When LDL-C was well-controlled (<70 mg/dL), the adverse effects of increased Lp(a) on cardiovascular risk were weakened regardless of hsCRP levels. 4

Treatment Implications from JUPITER

Rosuvastatin 20 mg daily in JUPITER achieved:

  • 55% reduction in LDL cholesterol and 36% reduction in hsCRP, with maximal event reduction in patients whose LDL cholesterol and hsCRP were lowered to <70 mg/dL and <2 mg/L, respectively. 1

  • The number needed to treat to prevent one CVD event was estimated at 38 over 5 years and 26 over 6.9 years in JUPITER-eligible populations. 2

Guideline Context and Limitations

While JUPITER demonstrated the prognostic value of hsCRP, guidelines emphasize important caveats:

  • The American Heart Association recommends hsCRP measurement in intermediate-risk patients (10-20% 10-year risk) to help reclassify them and justify more aggressive LDL-lowering targets (Class IIa). 5, 6

  • However, secondary prevention measures should not depend on hsCRP determination (Class III), and serial hsCRP testing should not be used to monitor treatment effects. 5, 6

  • LDL cholesterol remains the primary target for cardiovascular disease risk assessment and treatment, while CRP serves only as an adjunctive risk marker in select intermediate-risk patients. 7

Tracking of Elevated hsCRP Over Time

An important finding from JUPITER's placebo arm demonstrated that hsCRP is a stable marker:

  • The median hsCRP concentration in untreated individuals showed modest regression to the mean over time, declining from 3.8 mg/L at randomization to 3.4 mg/L at 4 years. 8

  • The intraclass correlation for repeated hsCRP measurements was 0.54 (95% CI: 0.53-0.55), indicating strong tracking comparable to blood pressure and LDL cholesterol. 8

  • Without statin therapy, increased concentrations of hsCRP generally remain high over time, supporting the concept of persistent residual inflammatory risk. 8

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.